dennis2146 wrote:
The difference John is that in America with the Left Wing anti gun politicians there is no real sensible gun regulation.
You are correct about there not being sensible gun regulation, but both parties are at fault for that.
dennis2146 wrote:
For many years there has been a talk from the Left of taking guns away from citizens even though the 2nd Amendment forbids such action.
As I have often said, an amendment can be amended again to keep up with the times. Your current version is a dinosaur and not applicable to this or even the past century.
dennis2146 wrote:
You might be aware there are over 25,000 gun laws on the books already. Yet many of those laws are not enforced. Don't ask me why. I have no idea. I can tell you that many of the laws are only meant to keep law abiding citizens from having firearms. Not one of the laws does anything to stop criminals from having or obtaining firearms. Criminals do not generally purchase firearms in a gun store as do honest citizens.
This is the most fallacious argument ever made in defence of gun ownership. Of course criminals will get guns despite regulations. The real point is that you want to prevent people who should not ever own guns from getting their hands on the them and BECOMING criminals!!!
dennis2146 wrote:
You might be aware of H****r B***n, President Biden's son, who purchased a firearm from a gun store but lied on the Federal Form 4473. Lying on that form is a felony charge of perjury. Over 60,000 people violate that law every year. Yet ATF does nothing to prosecute the offenders. Please explain to me why they do not.
You are the ex-cop; you should be able to explain that better than I can.
dennis2146 wrote:
That law is set up to stop criminals from purchasing firearms.
I don't buy that silly argument at all.
dennis2146 wrote:
As a drug abuser H****r B***n is prohibited from owning firearms. And yet he does. Is there a reason to enact even more anti gun laws when those we have are not enforced?
No, don't add yet another useless regulation or law. Trash the entire 2nd Amendment and all related/dependent laws and regulations and start from a clean slate.
dennis2146 wrote:
Another example: A felon is prohibited from owning firearms or ammunition. It is illegal, a felony, for ex felons to even touch a firearm. Yet it often happens that an armed felon is caught in the act of a burglary or theft. In order to have a speedy trial the District Attorney will drop the charge of felon in possession of a firearm and charge the felon with perhaps a simple trespassing charge. The felon gets a reduced sentence, the District Attorney can spout off that he has a high conviction rate for his next e******n speech and the criminal walks away after maybe a short term in a county jail rather than a state prison where he belongs.
Another example: A felon is prohibited from ownin... (
show quote)
That is just a normal part of your country's crazy judicial system where politics gets in the way of logic.
dennis2146 wrote:
Once again, why even have laws that are not enforced except for honest citizens of let's say someone who feels threatened and starts carrying a handgun because he thinks his neighbor is out to get him.
It truly is sad that people fear going out on the street without their sidearm.
dennis2146 wrote:
Our Left Wing fools have been wanting to confiscate or other wise do away with AR and AK platform rifles. Even though these exact rifles have a very minimal impact on crime the Left still wants to put on a big show of getting rid of them. Why is that John? Why the HUGE display of anti semi automatic rifles when similar rifles have been popular in America since the late 1800's. Perhaps you can explain that to all of us. Minimal use in crime statistics and yet the Left wants to get rid of these two rifle types. Why.
Our Left Wing fools have been wanting to confiscat... (
show quote)
A simple 2-word answer... stupid politics.
dennis2146 wrote:
Now I get you are not a gun person. But you can be a sometimes common sense person. So put away your anti gun bias and explain to us why the Left wants to take away something that does no or very minimal harm.
My common sense tells me that on a world scale the US is "way out in left field" (not politically, of course) when it comes to gun laws.