Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Yes, they are after your guns
Page <<first <prev 4 of 18 next> last>>
May 29, 2021 11:22:15   #
scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.
 
JohnFrim wrote:
Now THERE'S a very mature and info-contributing response!

Let me add meaningfully to the "discussion"...

First pic...
Did you forget to flush your latest dump?
Is that the best you have to offer the discussion?
How talented you are to get that curly on top, like a Dairy Queen serving! Do you do that by sliding around on the seat, or can you do it simply with sphincter control? (Asking for DJT.)

Second pic...
Self-portrait, I assume?
Are you suffering butt-hurt?
Try Pr********n-H.
Now THERE'S a very mature and info-contributing re... (show quote)


And yet another kanuk adds his totally meaningless 2 cents trying to protect his little buddy. You at least have intelligent things to contribute to posts, this not being a good example for you, but Krak has the same ol same ol. No argument no facts just the same useless garbage. I for one would rather he share his thoughts on the subject with his knowledge of the facts.

Reply
May 29, 2021 11:36:06   #
scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.
 
Leo_B wrote:
Such a ban will have ZERO impact other than infringing on the rights of honest citizens. That's the only goal of the left, to infringe on the honest citizens until they completely eliminate the 2A. They don't even care about those being hurt and k**led. Those victims are a benefit to their mission. It isn't completely unreasonable to think the left allows such attacks at times for the 'greater good' of their 2A cancellation campaign. You know, like allowing B******i and things of that sort.


I imagine any clear thinking individual would see the correlation between the left's push against the 2nd and the mass shootings taking place at a very opportune time to make their agenda seem right. Makes one wonder just how far the anti gun groups and politicians would go to get guns out of the hands of Americans.

Reply
May 29, 2021 12:03:29   #
trainspotter Loc: Oregon
 
cwp3420 wrote:
And it’s up to you to change our minds for our own good? I don’t give a rat’s behind what you think or what sites you approve of or denigrate. You’re a Canadian, and we really don’t care what you think.
Get ready for the "firm" to let you have it.....seems there are MORE then just myself who has NO use for krackster....but John the "firm" lets ME know every time, that I'm hurt'n sum wons feelwings....Once John the "firm" sends you a Prep-aration H note....well....you'd better back off on O'l krack.





Reply
 
 
May 29, 2021 12:14:33   #
Triple G
 
trainspotter wrote:
Get ready for the "firm" to let you have it.....seems there are MORE then just myself who has NO use for krackster....but John the "firm" lets ME know every time, that I'm hurt'n sum wons feelwings....Once John the "firm" sends you a Prep-aration H note....well....you'd better back off on O'l krack.


Most boys get over bathroom humor by age 10. What’s arrested your development?
https://www.nytimes.com/1983/08/30/science/tests-show-you-are-what-you-laugh-at.html

Reply
May 29, 2021 13:51:17   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
Triple G wrote:
Most boys get over bathroom humor by age 10. What’s arrested your development?
https://www.nytimes.com/1983/08/30/science/tests-show-you-are-what-you-laugh-at.html


Replying to TDS infected fools.

Reply
May 29, 2021 14:22:21   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
scooter1 wrote:
And yet another kanuk adds his totally meaningless 2 cents trying to protect his little buddy. You at least have intelligent things to contribute to posts, this not being a good example for you, but Krak has the same ol same ol. No argument no facts just the same useless garbage. I for one would rather he share his thoughts on the subject with his knowledge of the facts.


I just wanted to let you Amercuns know that you don't have a monopoly on gutter talk. I understand it, I can speak it, but I prefer not to most of the time.

Reply
May 29, 2021 14:34:11   #
InfiniteISO Loc: The Carolinas, USA
 
When CNN stated that police organizations supported David Chipman as head of ATF this is the top organization they listed

https://www.policeforum.org/membership-eligibility

I think a quick look at their website tells you all you need to know. You don't have to be in law enforcement to join.

Reply
 
 
May 29, 2021 14:40:52   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
scooter1 wrote:
I imagine any clear thinking individual would see the correlation between the left's push against the 2nd and the mass shootings taking place at a very opportune time to make their agenda seem right. Makes one wonder just how far the anti gun groups and politicians would go to get guns out of the hands of Americans.


What I do not understand is why a "civilized" (one might question that adjective!) society sees the need to own guns the way Americans do. You are the only nation on earth with that concept, and you have the gun violence and k*****gs to demonstrate the problem. There are many countries where people own guns for legitimate reasons and purposes, yet they do not have the problem that you have in the US. It really is possible to have sensible gun regulation AND gun ownership at the same time.

Reply
May 29, 2021 15:02:26   #
captivecookie Loc: Washington state
 
JohnFrim wrote:
What I do not understand is why a "civilized" (one might question that adjective!) society sees the need to own guns the way Americans do. You are the only nation on earth with that concept, and you have the gun violence and k*****gs to demonstrate the problem. There are many countries where people own guns for legitimate reasons and purposes, yet they do not have the problem that you have in the US. It really is possible to have sensible gun regulation AND gun ownership at the same time.
What I do not understand is why a "civilized&... (show quote)


I hypothesize there are countries out there right now who would like to take advantage of leadership they think is militarily weak to invade us. However, besides a well armed military with tanks and such, there are millions of armed civilian soldiers who would say NO to the invasion.

This is the reason the constitution allows us to be armed.

Reply
May 29, 2021 15:58:55   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
captivecookie wrote:
I hypothesize there are countries out there right now who would like to take advantage of leadership they think is militarily weak to invade us. However, besides a well armed military with tanks and such, there are millions of armed civilian soldiers who would say NO to the invasion.

This is the reason the constitution allows us to be armed.


No country is going to "invade" you in a way that can be stopped with your "musketeers." America will undoubtedly go down someday, but it will be defeated with economics and advanced technologies that "lead chuckers" will not be able to stop. It is not the Wild West anymore; it is 2021 and the future is computers, AI and software attacks on infrastructure.

Seriously, do you think Mexican or Canadian tanks are going to roll over you borders? Your biggest threat is actually... Americans!

Reply
May 29, 2021 16:14:15   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
JohnFrim wrote:
No country is going to "invade" you in a way that can be stopped with your "musketeers." America will undoubtedly go down someday, but it will be defeated with economics and advanced technologies that "lead chuckers" will not be able to stop. It is not the Wild West anymore; it is 2021 and the future is computers, AI and software attacks on infrastructure.

Seriously, do you think Mexican or Canadian tanks are going to roll over you borders? Your biggest threat is actually... Americans!
No country is going to "invade" you in a... (show quote)


Canada has plenty of tanks, if you are counting septic tanks.

Reply
 
 
May 29, 2021 16:17:23   #
Alafoto Loc: Montgomery, AL
 
JohnFrim wrote:
No country is going to "invade" you in a way that can be stopped with your "musketeers." America will undoubtedly go down someday, but it will be defeated with economics and advanced technologies that "lead chuckers" will not be able to stop. It is not the Wild West anymore; it is 2021 and the future is computers, AI and software attacks on infrastructure.

Seriously, do you think Mexican or Canadian tanks are going to roll over you borders? Your biggest threat is actually... Americans!
No country is going to "invade" you in a... (show quote)


"Your biggest threat is actually... Americans!" Though I generally disagree with almost everything that you say, I am compelled to admit that this is the truest statement ever made by a liberal.

Reply
May 29, 2021 16:47:28   #
captivecookie Loc: Washington state
 
Kraken wrote:
Canada has plenty of tanks, if you are counting septic tanks.


Lol.
They could actually be quite deadly.

Reply
May 29, 2021 16:49:50   #
captivecookie Loc: Washington state
 
JohnFrim wrote:
No country is going to "invade" you in a way that can be stopped with your "musketeers." America will undoubtedly go down someday, but it will be defeated with economics and advanced technologies that "lead chuckers" will not be able to stop. It is not the Wild West anymore; it is 2021 and the future is computers, AI and software attacks on infrastructure.

Seriously, do you think Mexican or Canadian tanks are going to roll over you borders? Your biggest threat is actually... Americans!
No country is going to "invade" you in a... (show quote)


No, I was thinking China or some such place. They have advanced technologies for bringing heavy things overseas.

And I wasn't thinking about the immediate future, but a possible future.

Reply
May 29, 2021 19:08:46   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
captivecookie wrote:
No, I was thinking China or some such place. They have advanced technologies for bringing heavy things overseas.

And I wasn't thinking about the immediate future, but a possible future.


I think in times long past times (Pearl Harbour) it may have been possible to mount a flotilla as you envision, but with today's surveillance I don't think it would ever happen. The USN and USAF would be all over the ships before they even got to international waters with their "cargo."

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 18 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.