Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
UniWB - Is it worth the trouble?
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
Apr 12, 2021 10:00:50   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
Ysarex wrote:
So you were completely full of BS or clueless when you just said this in response to those screenshots in NX Studio: "Real photos suggest that, according to the UniWB histograms, you blew the highlights in the green channel."

I'm a photographer and when behind the camera in the field there's no copy of Raw Digger embedded in the camera firmware. The photos are the proof.

I would prefer not to feed your Raw Diggery sickness. But in the interest of putting an end to your stream of BS here's one last fix for you. I told you the green channel was not blown. I wouldn't say it if it wasn't true. That's what you got now. You're to the point of making accusations and clearly not above that.

These two photos: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-692202-7.html#12152635 prove that UniWB can be a useful tool as an addition to the camera's exposure aids. So too do these photos: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-692202-4.html#12146668 They also prove that you're completely full of BS and you're wrong. And there is no need for further conversation.
So you were completely full of BS or clueless when... (show quote)

I guess you can't count either, "Those two photos are 2 minutes and 3 seconds apart." You got that wrong. It's closer to 1 minute and 23 seconds and some of that time was spent changing the WB setting.

You were obviously bracketing because you took three other images between the two you posted.

As for the picture you took of the camera's LCD, that's easy to fake since the highlight warnings flash slowly. It's easy to get a shot that appears to have no warnings between flashes. Why should we take your word for anything?

The only thing you proved is that you can get closer to a proper ETTR by bracketing than by watching the highlight warnings no matter what WB you are using. I wonder where I saw a thread describing that method? Oh, it was just this morning.

Do me a favor and stop trolling my thread. For that matter, do everyone a favor and stop trolling everyone else's threads as well.

Reply
Apr 12, 2021 10:16:09   #
Ysarex Loc: St. Louis
 
selmslie wrote:
Why should we take your word for anything?

Because you've falsely accused me in the past and been wrong. You can verify that the clipping warning wasn't flashing in the UniWB exposure by looking at the histogram in the NX Studio screenshot. It takes two clipped channels to activate it. So you don't have to take my word the facts are there and they prove you're full of BS and you're wrong.

You accused me of withholding the raw histogram because the green channel was blown. It wasn't and you were wrong. This whole thread is just you being wrong. You even devoted pages to trying to prove yourself wrong the one time you were right. HILARIOUS!

But hey, I'll bet you've still got a little more wrong in you. Go for it. I'm here for you.

Reply
Apr 12, 2021 11:17:16   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
Ysarex wrote:
Because you've falsely accused me in the past and been wrong. ...

That makes you right? You have been lying every time you repeated that, "there's no need for further conversation."

This entire conversation has been a waste of everyone's time. I'm sorry I ever responded to your trolling. Goodbye.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.