Camera Reco's.
Apr 5, 2021 20:03:07 #
Nope, I meant Robert.
—Bob
—Bob
selmslie wrote:
Never heard of him.
Did you mean Thomas Kincaid? He was one of the worst painters who ever used a gimmick and sold lots of crap to an unsophisticated audience.
Did you mean Thomas Kincaid? He was one of the worst painters who ever used a gimmick and sold lots of crap to an unsophisticated audience.
Apr 5, 2021 20:08:31 #
rmalarz wrote:
Nope, I meant Robert.
—Bob
—Bob
Apparently a nobody.
Apr 5, 2021 22:00:08 #
Apr 5, 2021 22:46:23 #
Apr 6, 2021 00:21:54 #
sab2101
I have extolled the virtues of my Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 on this forum several times. I sound like a broken record. It has a LEICA lens, zooms from 24 to 400mm (up to 800mm if you follow the directions in the manual), shoots in RAW and JPEG, has HDR and has a swivel screen in addition to a shielded EVF which allows you to see the image despite bright sunlight. The swivel screen allowed me to shoot over the heads of people in crowded art galleries in Italy. It is 20mp and I am very satisfied with the images up to 16" by 20". (I may be pleased with larger images, but I simply have not tried to go larger than 16" by 20".) I am quite critical of my work, as I still shoot 4" by 5" large format and Mamiya 645 AFd film cameras. Thus, my statement that I am very satisfied with the 16" by 20" from the Lumix is definitely saying something positive on its behalf. It was on sale for $700 four years ago, and may be less expensive now. The newer version is slightly more expensive and also has focus stacking and more emphasis on video than my original version, which I purchased through B and H.
BTW, I have not made any photographs larger than 16" by 20" with ANY of my film cameras including the ones mentioned above.
Hope this helps you.
Arca
I have extolled the virtues of my Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 on this forum several times. I sound like a broken record. It has a LEICA lens, zooms from 24 to 400mm (up to 800mm if you follow the directions in the manual), shoots in RAW and JPEG, has HDR and has a swivel screen in addition to a shielded EVF which allows you to see the image despite bright sunlight. The swivel screen allowed me to shoot over the heads of people in crowded art galleries in Italy. It is 20mp and I am very satisfied with the images up to 16" by 20". (I may be pleased with larger images, but I simply have not tried to go larger than 16" by 20".) I am quite critical of my work, as I still shoot 4" by 5" large format and Mamiya 645 AFd film cameras. Thus, my statement that I am very satisfied with the 16" by 20" from the Lumix is definitely saying something positive on its behalf. It was on sale for $700 four years ago, and may be less expensive now. The newer version is slightly more expensive and also has focus stacking and more emphasis on video than my original version, which I purchased through B and H.
BTW, I have not made any photographs larger than 16" by 20" with ANY of my film cameras including the ones mentioned above.
Hope this helps you.
Arca
Apr 6, 2021 08:53:43 #
rmalarz wrote:
In your world, apparently so.
--Bob
--Bob
He is a frictional character played by Clint Eastwood in the movies "Bridges of Madison County" and he shot bridges.
Apr 6, 2021 09:49:48 #
Panasonic Lumix cameras come in a variety of focal lengths as well as prices. They use Leica lenses. The photos that I have seen that were taken with them were very nice.
Apr 6, 2021 11:04:52 #
Arca wrote:
sab2101 br br I have extolled the virtues of my P... (show quote)
Thanks for your response, I appreciate it very much. The Lumix Fz 1000 was one that I was considering.......Mike
Apr 6, 2021 22:13:44 #
--Bob
BebuLamar wrote:
He is a frictional character played by Clint Eastwood in the movies "Bridges of Madison County" and he shot bridges.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.