WillieWisconsin wrote:
Same here, no thanks! Hard to wrap my head around a $6,500 camera. What on earth makes this camera worth that much?
The Nikon D6 also costs $6,500. The cost of having the top of the line (ie. most expensive) of a particular brand these days.
I'll stick with the Nikon D6.
Pablo8 wrote:
I'll stick with the Nikon D6.
You’re surely not alone being stuck ;-)
Is it a Leica or a Sony? Those are Leica prices.
joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
I wonder how it will affect A9 prices?
No global shutter? Harrumph! I'll pass...
It's a pro camera meant for the pro-market. It's a winner.
Canon will step up... no worries there.
Nikon? Bad news for Nikon.
WillieWisconsin wrote:
Same here, no thanks! Hard to wrap my head around a $6,500 camera. What on earth makes this camera worth that much?
Reletively less units will be made, hence a higher price.
Specs only go so far. How will it perform in the real world is what will be the test.
If you don't buy it & the Experia(or what ever the phone is called) you won't be able to take great pictures any more! But seriously , you go out & buy that & next year or 6 months from now, something more powerful will be released. Sports, action &, wildlife
They always look good on the spec sheet, We will see when the consumer versions are on the shelf & the reviewer's do their thing. Hopefully, it will do what they claim.
joer wrote:
Improved auto focus, 8k video, flash in silent shutter, higher res view finder, more.
Hope it's not priced beyond reach.
Chelsea N will have to change brands again.
They say around $ 6500. Look at what the Nikon D6 & Canon 1D3 or what ever model it is sells for. With better performance, the price is probably justified. Your personal wallet , YMMV.
Nalu
Loc: Southern Arizona
Haven't looked, but is this the rumored a9III?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.