SteveR wrote:
I had a color printer once. I found that the cost of color printer ink was prohibitive. I had a nice Epson but it even used color ink when I printed black text. I figured it out and I could have my prints made less expensively through outside sources.
Use an inkjet printer long enough and you learn these things:
> Inkjet printing is for IMMEDIACY.
> Inkjet printing maximizes PRINT LONGEVITY, but only when you use the proper printer, inks, and papers.
> Inkjet printing maximizes COLOR GAMUT and COLOR ACCURACY. At the high end of the inkjet printing market are 8-14 ink machines that produce a much wider color gamut than is possible to achieve with conventional silver halide papers. For this reason, advertisers producing product posters for point of purchase displays use inkjet printing (think cars, clothes, and custom color logo reproduction).
> Inkjet printing maximizes QUALITY CONTROL, if you know your way around ICC color management and post-processing. It yields unpredictable and frustrating results, and lots of waste, if you don't have those skills.
> Inkjet printing maximizes the RANGE OF PAPERS and other substrates you can use. Most photo labs use either glossy (F surface) or luster/lustre (E surface) silver halide papers. When they have an order to print canvas, or real metal, or fabric, or archival cotton rag paper, they usually use inkjet printers (and charge a lot more per square inch!).
> Inkjet printing is for PRIVACY. Anything sensitive can be handled without a lab getting in your business.
> The finest portrait photographers, commercial photographers, high-end service bureaus, art museums, and artist reproduction services ALL use inkjet output. They often call it "giclee" printing.
> Inkjet printing DOES NOT SAVE MONEY. Silver Halide processes used by traditional wet process photo labs are much less expensive. But prints last only 20 to 50 years, compared with 100 to 400 years, under the same storage and display conditions (according to Wilhelm Research... Google it). (Always check the assumptions for any such tests. Vendors test their papers to random standards. Wilhelm uses one standard.)
> My take on inkjet is that it is worth it for exhibition prints. For snapshots and photo gifts, I'll use a conventional lab.
In 2004, I printed 15 archival custom photo calendars for holiday gifts. They cost me around $20 each (in 2021 dollars) to make, not including my many after-hours of labor at the lab I worked for. I used an Epson 9600 inkjet photo printer, double-sided THICK matte surface paper, and a $50,000 Bremson HR500+ lab scanner to scan my best Kodachromes from the 1970s and '80s. The calendars were gorgeous, but most of them probably got thrown away... except for the two I kept. I won't do that again! I'll use mpix or Shutterfly. They charge more than $20 for calendars, but I don't have to do all the work!