The Revolution Was Televised Live!GSH
Jan 16, 2021 09:15:08 #
Triple G wrote:
You are selective on the facts. Protestors are on... (show quote)
You've uttered a gross exaggeration, which I doubt you truly believe....
But it sure sounds dramatic, huh.....???
Jan 16, 2021 10:57:50 #
Alafoto
Loc: Montgomery, AL
Triple G wrote:
You are selective on the facts. Protestors are on... (show quote)
I'm thinking that if the intent of the r****rs was to k**l anyone, more of them would have come better armed.
Jan 16, 2021 13:50:23 #
Alafoto wrote:
I'm thinking that if the intent of the r****rs was to k**l anyone, more of them would have come better armed.
It just doesn't make any sense, eh.....???
Jan 16, 2021 14:52:26 #
And with better organization.
One report, however, says some in the mob gave military-style hand signs. Thankfully, the FBI has begun rounding up the offenders one by one across the nation.
I note the security agencies did not do much better, either. They did not coordinate beforehand despite warnings. They dropped the ball big time.
After a little digging, I found that near 9 percent of our Presidents have been assassinated. I say that not bullets but b****ts should determine leadership.
One report, however, says some in the mob gave military-style hand signs. Thankfully, the FBI has begun rounding up the offenders one by one across the nation.
I note the security agencies did not do much better, either. They did not coordinate beforehand despite warnings. They dropped the ball big time.
After a little digging, I found that near 9 percent of our Presidents have been assassinated. I say that not bullets but b****ts should determine leadership.
Alafoto wrote:
I'm thinking that if the intent of the r****rs was to k**l anyone, more of them would have come better armed.
Jan 16, 2021 14:56:35 #
Alafoto wrote:
I'm thinking that if the intent of the r****rs was to k**l anyone, more of them would have come better armed.
Neither thinking nor planning was evident. Besides the actual outcome, what did they expect would happen?
Jan 16, 2021 14:59:50 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
slocumeddie wrote:
Massive v***r f***d is the only way that an incumbent who fills arenas could lose to a mumbling clown puppet who can't fill a phone booth.....
They went to see him as he is seemingly an effective entertainer. They v**ed for Biden because they don’t like the way Trump has run the country. Biden probably wouldn’t do well as an entertainer. Trump certainly didn’t do well as President
Jan 16, 2021 19:38:08 #
slocumeddie wrote:
Massive v***r f***d is the only way that an incumbent who fills arenas could lose to a mumbling clown puppet who can't fill a phone booth.....
Yep!
Jan 17, 2021 01:40:44 #
berchman wrote:
"There are good people on both sides" said Trump. There are extremists on *both* sides?
Bet your ass they’re are, Berchie.
Jan 17, 2021 01:43:00 #
sb wrote:
OR.... perhaps the majority of Americans who v**ed... (show quote)
Who’s the senile old China loving p*******e on the right side of your photo?
Jan 17, 2021 01:46:04 #
thom w wrote:
They went to see him as he is seemingly an effective entertainer. They v**ed for Biden because they don’t like the way Trump has run the country. Biden probably wouldn’t do well as an entertainer. Trump certainly didn’t do well as President
China Joe Biden does quite well though as a thoroughly corrupt politician and a c*****rjack p*******e. I wonder where H****r learned all of his trade secrets? At daddy China Joe’s knee.
Jan 17, 2021 07:45:31 #
The nonstop lies, bias, and propaganda of the news media workers and the political hatred of the Democrats along with the rabid opposition of social extremists fell on the President daily for four years. Perverse descriptions of the actions of the President filled columns of digital newsprint. Who but Superman could withstand this connivance of assault?
This combined phenomenon became so pronounced that it gained a formula: Anti-Trump Derangement Syndrome. Under it, an individual cannot see or think straight about anything the President says or does, regardless of merit.
Overall, we may describe the collective reaction to the President as an abuse of free expression arising largely from emotionalism and kneejerk dislike of his persona, minus objective examination of facts and information.
The President practiced his own version of free expression by thinking for himself, by speaking his mind, and by calling things by their proper name.
Meanwhile, his slogan "America First" became distorted to mean f*****m when instead he acted to put the interests of the nation and its citizens first over the interests of foreigners.
These conflicting views brought division of the national dialog, only made worse by the news media openly taking sides against the President. This one-sidedness unbalanced the output of the news media workers who in turn misinformed the public in a democracy.
We shall see how it goes with the new President. For now, he appears to equate reversing the policies of his predecessor as some kind of progress. His proposal to throw taxpayer dollars at a project to boost the economy apparently will require a jump in taxes to pay for it.
During his campaign, he offered to cancel the $1.7 trillion in student debt (otherwise known as buying v**es). How will this action affect national finance and the national debt? This mountain of debt could become easier to pay back by lowering monthly installments and by extending the term of the debt.
This combined phenomenon became so pronounced that it gained a formula: Anti-Trump Derangement Syndrome. Under it, an individual cannot see or think straight about anything the President says or does, regardless of merit.
Overall, we may describe the collective reaction to the President as an abuse of free expression arising largely from emotionalism and kneejerk dislike of his persona, minus objective examination of facts and information.
The President practiced his own version of free expression by thinking for himself, by speaking his mind, and by calling things by their proper name.
Meanwhile, his slogan "America First" became distorted to mean f*****m when instead he acted to put the interests of the nation and its citizens first over the interests of foreigners.
These conflicting views brought division of the national dialog, only made worse by the news media openly taking sides against the President. This one-sidedness unbalanced the output of the news media workers who in turn misinformed the public in a democracy.
We shall see how it goes with the new President. For now, he appears to equate reversing the policies of his predecessor as some kind of progress. His proposal to throw taxpayer dollars at a project to boost the economy apparently will require a jump in taxes to pay for it.
During his campaign, he offered to cancel the $1.7 trillion in student debt (otherwise known as buying v**es). How will this action affect national finance and the national debt? This mountain of debt could become easier to pay back by lowering monthly installments and by extending the term of the debt.
thom w wrote:
They went to see him as he is seemingly an effective entertainer. They v**ed for Biden because they don’t like the way Trump has run the country. Biden probably wouldn’t do well as an entertainer. Trump certainly didn’t do well as President
Jan 17, 2021 07:54:58 #
anotherview wrote:
The nonstop lies, bias, and propaganda of the news... (show quote)
Trump is not a victim, of the press or anybody-except perhaps of his own warped reality. He is a narcissistic fool, who is leaving the office in disgrace, with the country in far worse shape than when he promised to make America great again. He failed miserably.
Jan 17, 2021 08:02:14 #
Objectively evaluating some aspect of the policies or actions of the President would take your comment beyond the superficial.
Kmgw9v wrote:
Trump is not a victim, of the press or anybody-except perhaps if his own warped reality. He is a narcissistic fool, who is leaving the office in disgrace, with the country in far worse shape than when he promised to make America great again. He failed miserably.
Jan 17, 2021 09:06:16 #
anotherview wrote:
Objectively evaluating some aspect of the policies or actions of the President would take your comment beyond the superficial.
Km's blind hatred of all things Trump render him unable to evaluate anything objectively.......
Jan 17, 2021 09:10:20 #
anotherview wrote:
Objectively evaluating some aspect of the policies or actions of the President would take your comment beyond the superficial.
Right. Trump has done a fine job and there is no need to evaluate further.
Just stay in denial and enjoy what Trump has left us with.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.