ArtzDarkroom Loc: Near Disneyland-Orange County, California

They nearly won. It was not The Radical Left instigating change. The band of revolutionaries was encouraged by several angry men, including 45. The Rally attendees came prepared to battle.

Soon The White House Crib will vacate a petulant Child, and Mr. Rogers will move in.

tradio Loc: Oxford, Ohio

Scored some good weed, did ya?

anotherview Loc: California

The extremists on both sides, fomented by the news media and its propaganda, lies, and bias, have divided us. As a counter, let us recall our national motto: E Pluribus Unum ("From Many One").

The promise of America remains vital, and for the awaken, it propels to a patriotism that clarifies, heals, and unifies.

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

Are you saying ... "Massive V***r F***d!!!" ... was a dangerous, irresponsible lie?

berchman Loc: South Central PA

"There are good people on both sides" said Trump. There are extremists on *both* sides?

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

Massive v***r f***d is the only way that an incumbent who fills arenas could lose to a mumbling clown puppet who can't fill a phone booth.....

incognito

The saddest part is that most people are losing sight of the real danger to us and our country and that is
CENSORSHIP. People being fired because they believe the opposite of their employers People are being shamed in public by the liberal government and not one of you folks give a rats ass about it. Well that is one of the first steps to c*******m and socialism. Now all you folks get in a circle and sing Kumbaya and everything will be hunky dory hahaha.

Triple G

There’s a book that says you should have learned everything in life you need when young and playing in the sandbox. Starting and taking part in a r**t gets you kicked out of the sandbox.

anotherview Loc: California

Nope. I say instead that e******n irregularities very likely happened in certain states. One could argue that by 60 lawsuits receiving dismissals without examination of their claims, a connivance appears. Likewise, the news media in its reportage steadfastly and uniformly omitted a Web-link to these lawsuits for a citizen to read and evaluate -- more connivance.

In his rally speech, the President presented some of these claims, but again they prompted no examination, only disdain by assertion and by dismissal with the words "baseless" and "unfounded" and similar ones across the board.

The news media workers, their feelings hurt by the President's characterizing their work product as f**e news, went on a non-stop rampage of h**eful reportage along with lies, bias, and propaganda against him.

Now we see another spiteful attempt by the House to impeach the President, a move again certain to fail in the Senate due to inadequate support therein for this hasty move.

This citizen believes that political history will describe the administration of the President in objective terms. Some individuals now so prominent in their public role while spewing venom at the President, will come in due time to look like political pygmies.

sb Loc: Florida's East Coast

OR.... perhaps the majority of Americans who v**ed for Biden were also v****g AGAINST a dangerous cult leader who could fill up a stadium with followers who believe any lie the dangerous f*****t says. It is funny how Florida has the exact same methods of v****g that the Trump campaign challenged in court in numerous other states - we v**e by mail in large numbers....signature matching must occur...there were not all that many monitors. And yet - no concerns about the legitimacy of this e******n. In fact, there were people who are not legal residents (Trump) who v**ed here! So - sounds like someone has been drinking the KoolAid for the past four years and can't get off...

Besides...look at history. If crowd size related to e******n results, Elizabeth Warren would be our new president.

In one article I found on a quick Google search it says:

For every example like 2008, when then-Sen. Barack Obama’s huge crowds seemed to reflect real enthusiasm for his campaign, there is one like 2012, when former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney won his primary despite drawing noticeably small crowds on the campaign trail. Or take what happened in 2016. Despite a lot of hay being made about crowd sizes during the 2016 campaign, that cycle also was an argument against crowd sizes being predictive. Although now-President Trump did often draw large crowds at his primary rallies, Hillary Clinton reportedly beat him out for largest crowd of the 2016 campaign, 40,000 to 30,000. And at roughly this point in the Democratic primary in 2016, Sen. Bernie Sanders was outdrawing Clinton!

berchman Loc: South Central PA

Perhaps you can enlighten us by posting a link to one of those dismissed lawsuits and the court's reasoning for dismissing them? I think I might be able to slog my way through the legalese.

anotherview Loc: California

Nope. Would not burden you with that reading. My point has to do with the processes involved which I've outlined.

But you could read the President's longish rally speech, if you wish:

(found at: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-told-supporters-stormed-capitol-hill/story?id=75110558)

incognito

Sure and when did you complain about the r**ts that your wise democratic mayors and guberment officials condoned and supported. Why are they not impeached? Can you say Double Standard?

Triple G

You are selective on the facts. Protestors are one thing; violent r****rs are another. The latter are criminals and they have been arrested and facing our justice system. When you take those violent r****rs and go after the US capitol and seek to k**l congressmen and destroy the democratic process all because of a big lie from trump, you’ve entered the realm of being t*****rs. You have attached yourself to a ‘movement” as trump called it and it’s the most disastrous thing that has ever occurred in the USA.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

You sound a lot like the people "another view" just described.