I am not trying to defend Trump. He is going to lose his court cases and Biden is going to be named president.

That does not mean that the e******n rules changes this year didn't alter the outcome of the e******n, nor does it change that any of those changes not specifically approved by state legislatures are unconstitutional.

Biden won because the rules were illegally changed. The fact that some judges do not have the intellectual honesty to read the Constitution and throw out those changes is what constitutes fraud. There is no way to interpret the Constitution other than that the various state legislatures must make all e******n rules. It is a fact that this year they did not. That is not an opinion. That is a fact. The only opinion involved in my statement is the opinion that Trump would have won had the rules not been changed. That is opinion. But anyone with a second grade education can clearly read the Constitution and know that it was not followed.

I am amazed that liberals refuse to acknowledge what the Constitution says. I'm not arguing with you. I am stating a fact concerning what the Constitution says. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge that shows just how biased you are.

I haven't found anything that will save Trump. Judges who think like you do will allow the e******n to stand as done despite the fact that it was done illegally.

Example, a judge correctly ruled that Newsom overstepped his authority in California, but the v**e still stands. My point is that the e******n was s****n by the illegal rule changes, not that Trump will eventually be named president. He will not. Biden will be declared the winner, but that doesn't change the fact that the rules were illegally changed.

I am amazed that liberals refuse to acknowledge what the Constitution says. I'm not arguing with you. I am stating a fact concerning what the Constitution says. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge that shows just how biased you are.

I haven't found anything that will save Trump. Judges who think like you do will allow the e******n to stand as done despite the fact that it was done illegally.

Example, a judge correctly ruled that Newsom overstepped his authority in California, but the v**e still stands. My point is that the e******n was s****n by the illegal rule changes, not that Trump will eventually be named president. He will not. Biden will be declared the winner, but that doesn't change the fact that the rules were illegally changed.

I am amazed that liberals refuse to acknowledge what the Constitution says. I'm not arguing with you. I am stating a fact concerning what the Constitution says. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge that shows just how biased you are.

I haven't found anything that will save Trump. Judges who think like you do will allow the e******n to stand as done despite the fact that it was done illegally.

Example, a judge correctly ruled that Newsom overstepped his authority in California, but the v**e still stands. My point is that the e******n was s****n by the illegal rule changes, not that Trump will eventually be named president. He will not. Biden will be declared the winner, but that doesn't change the fact that the rules were illegally changed.