gwr wrote:
I can't wait for it to get here. I haven't heard anything bad about the camera. People just love it. Gary
only thing you might hear is that it's a bit on the heavy side , but the weight helps steady the camera it also adds to it's sturdiness, all said and done chunkiness is a good thing in this case
I have the nikon 810 is it worth updating to 850?
I have the nikon 810 is it worth updating to 850?
Fkaufman3 wrote:
I have the nikon 810 is it worth updating to 850?
I have both caneras, but I would say it is not worth "upgrading" from the D810 to the D850. The D850 is a great camera. It offers some very nice features that the D810 doesn't have. It has a tiny bit of improvement in dynamic range and sensitivity. It also has some improvements in the layout of key controls that I really like. But the changes are, in reality, pretty incremental.
I bought mine to have a second full frame body, and I'm very happy to have it. But I still prefer my D810 in situations where the much quieter shutter is preferred. As big as the increase in resolution looks on paper, it is also incremental, not earth shattering.
The one case that I would enthusiastically say yes, though, is if your "other" camera is a D500. The D850 and D500 are functional and operational twins. It is completely transparent in every way to move from one of those cameras to the other.
sudamar wrote:
Thanks. Now I know a little about Focus Peaking. It is getting so that someday cameras won't need a person behind them to take a picture. There won't be anything left for the person to do. The camera will do it all. I'm not so sure that is a great thing.
If you can think that way, it implies that you never do what really matters when you are that person behind the camera.
gwr
Loc: South Dartmouth, Ma.
Fkaufman3 wrote:
I have the nikon 810 is it worth updating to 850?
If you have a ned for a few more mega pixels, maybe but both cameras get really good reviews. A few pages back someone said I have an 810 and I'm not upgrading to the 850. Gary
larryepage wrote:
I use a wide variety of lenses on my D850. They all give better results on the D850 than on older cameras. I'm pretty sure that the purpose of the list that you describe (which does contain a lot of nice lenses) was intended much more to sell lenses than it was to improve peoples' photography.
What's funny to me is that the sensor in the D500 puts almost exactly the same demands on lenses that the one in the D850 does (except for not needing the bigger image circle). It captures almost indistinguishable images, also. I don't recall ever reading a word about requiring only the best lenses on that camera.
Someone mentioned wanting a lower price on the D500. I agree that's not likely to happen. Remember that the D200 was $2000 when it was introduced almost 15 years ago, as were the D300 and D300s. That makes the D500 quite a bargain at its current price as a great all-around DX DSLR.
I use a wide variety of lenses on my D850. They al... (
show quote)
Pixel density the same on D500 as D850. A D850 shot in crop mode is equivalent to D500 except D850 produces some better dynamic range.
gwr
Loc: South Dartmouth, Ma.
Zeke4351 wrote:
Pixel density the same on D500 as D850. A D850 shot in crop mode is equivalent to D500 except D850 produces some better dynamic range.
Thanks for the info. I jumped from a D7100 to the D850. Immediately after I bought it I had medical issues. Had surgery yesterday. As soon as I can get off the couch without groaning I'm hoping to use it extensively. I have about 4 clicks on the shutter. Gary
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.