Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What to use when current camera becomes to heavy
Page <prev 2 of 11 next> last>>
Oct 20, 2020 05:11:06   #
timoore Loc: Bordeaux, France
 
larryepage wrote:
My long term plan if and when things get too heavy it to keep the cameras and adjust what lenses I use. I've already added a 24-120mm f/4 for those all day outings when I just don't want to carry a 24-70mm f/2.8. Let's face it...for a lot of what we photograph, the requirement to use the highest tier premium lens is only in our minds. I've identified a path to reduce lens weight while keeping good performance and the camera, which, regardless of what gets said here, is the most important part of the equation. If I ever find myself reduced to just a D500 or D850 and just a 35mm or a 50mm or an 85mm, I'll still be many miles farther along in capability from where I spent many years with a Minolta DSLR, and it delivered many, many excellent images over many years.
My long term plan if and when things get too heavy... (show quote)


Especially with the cropping possibilities of the D850. I recently took only the D800 and a 50mm to Paris for two days due to space constraints on the train. Compact, not super heavy, happily cropped away in postprocessing. It would have been nice to have a zoom to get this shot, but I'm satisfied with the result.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Oct 20, 2020 05:52:41   #
Douglas Tharp Loc: Texas
 
I have been a Nikon shooter for over 15 years. I found the weigh of my D500 to be to much for my back. Traded my Nikon for Olympus gear with a OMD M1 Mark 2. Bought Pro lens series and have been very happy with the kit.

Olympus has the M1 Mark2 on sale today for $899.00, great price.

Reply
Oct 20, 2020 06:24:49   #
wildweasel
 
I have been shooting with the Olympus EM1 Mark ll for 5 years now and I love this camera, and Olympus and others have great deals on this camera now. I paid $2,000 for mine and Olympus is offering it for $799.00 now. You won't be sorry.

Reply
 
 
Oct 20, 2020 06:31:27   #
Douglas Tharp Loc: Texas
 
$799.00 WOW!

Reply
Oct 20, 2020 07:09:32   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
hogilbert wrote:
At a young 84 I find I am no longer able to hold my D750 steady enough for good images. Unless I use a tripod most images are soft. I have tried monopod with some success but I really like to shoot street photography so that does not work well. It has been suggested by some of my camera club friends that I may be able to hand hold a lighter camera. Any suggestions would be appreciated. The mirror less 4 3rds such as Olympus OM-DE-M10 Mark IV looks like it would be a lot lighter than the D750. Any experience with mirror less 4 3rds?
At a young 84 I find I am no longer able to hold m... (show quote)


1. Don't care how old you are, VR is made to keep your images steady. I believe you are working up a rationale to purchase the Olympus.
2. Many here make the mistake in buying a mirrorless only to find that their hands don't fit as well because of the mini size of the camera. I strongly suggest you put the Olympus in your hands before you buy.
3. I shoot wildlife, a long lens on a mirrorless camera is not that much different in weight than a FF DSLR.
4. a 4/3 sensor is much smaller than the FF sensor on your D750. But, if your not going to go large on your images, then the 4/3 sensor should work out well for snapshot and cell phone type images.

Reply
Oct 20, 2020 07:18:00   #
Bill1967 Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado now Wilmington NC
 
You won’t be disappointed with Olympus OM-D10. I have the mark 11 version.

Reply
Oct 20, 2020 07:22:08   #
sroc
 
My experience with M 4/3 is with the Olympus OMD EM1. The OMD EM1 Mark ii with the 12-40mm f 2.8 PRO lens comes in at 1.061 Kg/2.34 lbs. The OMD EM1 Mark iii with the 12-100mm f4 Pro lens comes in at 1.277 Kg/2.84 lbs. BOth cameras have excellent IS (5 stops).

Reply
 
 
Oct 20, 2020 07:56:25   #
bikerguy
 
About 18 months ago we made the switch from Canon DSLRs to the Olympus EM1 M2 manily for weight and size reduction. Not only is the body lighter but so are the lenses. I looked at the Fuji but the lenses are very big and heavy compared to the Oly. The additional advantages such as 5 stop IBIS and WWYSIWYG viewing are addded bonuses. After you switch you will wonder why you waited so long.

Reply
Oct 20, 2020 07:56:35   #
Lagoonguy Loc: New Smyrna Beach, FL
 
I still have my D750 for occasional use but I went to a Panasonic G-9 and Panasonic/Leica & Olympus lenses for my travel photography because of the weight issue and the lack of stabilization in my Sigma Art fast lenses, I just could not hold the rig steady enough in low light without blur occurring. Problem solved, thanks to the camera in body stabilization that works well even though most primes aren’t stabilized. I can still shoot well with stabilized lenses with my Nikons but I no longer want to travel with them. The M4/3 systems are very good. Good luck.

Reply
Oct 20, 2020 08:08:33   #
Canisdirus
 
It may be time to go to a "bridge" camera.
You will get what you need for almost all situation in a small light package.

Reply
Oct 20, 2020 08:10:38   #
sueyeisert Loc: New Jersey
 
I love Fuji you could also look at the Fuji XT-30.

Reply
 
 
Oct 20, 2020 08:27:39   #
CaptainPhoto
 
I'm 76 and switched to the Olympus mirrorless about 4 years ago. I really like it. Much lighter and the lenses are a whole lot smaller. What is even better is the in-body stabilization. I had the OM-D-M1-Mk II which has 5 axis stabilization. I now have the Mk III. Love it.

Reply
Oct 20, 2020 08:29:00   #
minniev Loc: MIssissippi
 
I switched to Olympus m4/3 cameras some years ago to cope with a shoulder injury, and was way too satisfied with the quality, the options, and the lower weight of the system to ever go back to a full size DSLR or give up my wonderfully useful electronic viewfinder. I shoot landscape, birds, street, family and vacation, and architecture successfully. I print up to 24x36 well enough to manage successful sales and gallery shows, but I have no need for wall-size prints so I’m not sure about that. The Oly cameras I’ve used have great image stabilization and though my hands are not very steady I can hand hold down to 1/10 second. The lenses are lightweight enough that I can carry a camera and 6 lenses ( 3 zooms and 3 primes) covering 9-300 in a 5 lb backpack or sling bag. I agree with the suggestion that before buying any camera you should hold one and see if it fits in your hands and if the button/control array seems workable for you. The one downside for me is noise in low light high ISO images. Also, the Olympus camera division has recently changed hands and there is concern about the future, but I figure it will outlast me so I’m OK with that.

Reply
Oct 20, 2020 08:33:17   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
Bill_de wrote:
https://totalgymdirect.com/shop/total-gym-xls/

Never too old.

---


There's no need to spend $1000 on that gimmick. Resistance bands, a pullup bar, and pushup handles will make anyone strong.

Reply
Oct 20, 2020 08:40:30   #
lwerthe1mer Loc: Birmingham, Alabama
 
My switch was from a Sony a73 to a Fuji XT3. I’ve been pleased with my photos with the smaller sensor and like the lighter equipment.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.