House bill would block r****rs from c****av***s unemployment benefits: INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. - A House Republican introduced a bill Friday that would make those charged with violence...

Vietnam Vet

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. - A House Republican introduced a bill Friday that would make those charged with violence, l**ting or vandalism in connection with a protest ineligible for enhanced c****av***s unemployment benefits.

The “Support Peaceful Protest Act” would also make r****rs “financially liable for the cost of federal policing,” according to the bill, which is sponsored by U.S. Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind.

He said many r****rs have time to participate in violence because they are unemployed people receiving government benefits -- including increased federal benefits for those who have lost their jobs amid the p******c.

Read more here:
https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/house-bill-would-block-r****rs-from-c****av***s-unemployment-benefits?fbclid=IwAR1VljaOrYt44YaVxpiPomi9k4szGOOFuKxam9eu8zDmJ3eKCRPMrw9G2IE

IDguy Loc: Idaho

No chance of the Dumbocrats approving that. A political gesture.

But I support the spirit of it.

I can’t get my head around someone that would suit up with protective gear and shields to go out late at night and attack buildings and police...night after night. They clearly are not productive, or even harmless, members of society.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Vietnam Vet wrote:

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. - A House Republican introduced... (show quote)

Most excellent but the B-urn, L-oot and M-urder evil h**e America democrats and Pelosi will NEVER do anything good for America and pass this bill. That is why they want to virtually indefinitely extend the federal benefits so their Storm Troopers are financed in their destruction and murder of police throughout this nation.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Dumb bill . People “charged” with violance . Charged with is not guilty of.
In this country we are innocent until proven guilty.

Now if they are found guilty . It’s ok .

Rose42

DennyT wrote:

Dumb bill . People “charged” with violance . Charged with is not guilty of.
In this country we are innocent until proven guilty.

Now if they are found guilty . It’s ok .

Not anymore. Now its trial by media and guilty until proven innocent.

mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area

Architect1776 wrote:

Most excellent but the B-urn, L-oot and M-urder evil h**e America democrats and Pelosi will NEVER do anything good for America and pass this bill. That is why they want to virtually indefinitely extend the federal benefits so their Storm Troopers are financed in their destruction and murder of police throughout this nation.

Still scared to answer the a******n question from yesterday.

sb Loc: Florida's East Coast

Being "charged" with a crime does not make one guilty. The bill would have to be aimed at anyone "found guilty" of such acts. And it would assume that those persons were previously employed... Many of them appear to be anarchists.

travelwp Loc: New Jersey

IDguy wrote:

I can’t get my head around someone that would suit up with protective gear and shields to go out late at night and attack buildings and police...night after night. They clearly are not productive, or even harmless, members of society.

I think they are being paid to go out night after night. The left agenda is to have people fear everything (v***s, burning buildings, violence, r**ts, shootings) and want people believe that Trump can't fix it; and that agenda is supported by the Democrat media that keeps posting hourly fear in the headlines.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

travelwp wrote:

I think they are being paid to go out night after night. The left agenda is to have people fear everything (v***s, burning buildings, violence, r**ts, shootings) and want people believe that Trump can't fix it; and that agenda is supported by the Democrat media that keeps posting hourly fear in the headlines.

You may believe that, but you have shown no evidence of thinking.

yds0066 Loc: Southwestern Illinois

DennyT wrote:

Dumb bill . People “charged” with violance . Charged with is not guilty of.
In this country we are innocent until proven guilty.

Now if they are found guilty . It’s ok .

Then why are Police being fired almost immediately after a shooting, many have not been charged. Aren’t they innocent until proven guilty?

RonM12 Loc: Washington State

[quote=DennyT]Dumb bill . People “charged” with violance . Charged with is not guilty of.
In this country we are innocent until proven guilty.

Not anymore, the media And other groups are quick to convict In order to support their narrative.

incognito

DennyT wrote:

Dumb bill . People “charged” with violance . Charged with is not guilty of.
In this country we are innocent until proven guilty.

Now if they are found guilty . It’s ok .

Gee tell that to Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler, and Schiff along with Maxine, Tlaib, Omar, AOC, and Bald Pressley.

incognito

thom w wrote:

You may believe that, but you have shown no evidence of thinking.

Look up George Soros that N**i Collaborator. He is the guy with deep pockets that pays these groups. I wonder how much he pays you.

yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon

mjmoore17 wrote:

Still scared to answer the a******n question from yesterday.

When does the life cycle of a mammal begin...

Leo_B Loc: Houston suburb

mjmoore17 wrote:

Still scared to answer the a******n question from yesterday.

Yeah, you're a huge proponent of legalized murder and I believe a doctor yourself who in typical l*****t liar fashion ignores your oath and does harm repetitively in murdering babies. Wh**ever question you have the answer is baby murdering.