vigneting
Sep 24, 2012 17:21:48 #
gessman wrote:
Well, that's not adequate to diminish the poor lil' ol' animal's habitat further - we're already closing in on them from all angles and leaving them no place to go as it is without photoshoppin' the hell out of their environment. :-)
bull drink water wrote:
just because i felt like it.
Well, that's not adequate to diminish the poor lil' ol' animal's habitat further - we're already closing in on them from all angles and leaving them no place to go as it is without photoshoppin' the hell out of their environment. :-)
I feel privileged to say that I live in a county the size of Connecticut with a population of about 50,000. I live 6 miles outside of the largest town and county seat of Gila Co. with population of 7,000. I'm surrounded by wildlife.
But these areas are shrinking and becoming fewer and fewer.
Sep 24, 2012 19:48:38 #
It's interesting how some photographer's don't like any kind of vigneting. When I owned my studio back in the 70's (The Film Days) I used vigneting on about all portraits to darken the corners a little. I still use it today on some photographs. It's the guy behind the camera that knows what will look right......
Sep 24, 2012 20:00:29 #
Photo One wrote:
It's interesting how some photographer's don't like any kind of vigneting. When I owned my studio back in the 70's (The Film Days) I used vigneting on about all portraits to darken the corners a little. I still use it today on some photographs. It's the guy behind the camera that knows what will look right......
I use it often also, especially on portraits. However, when overdone it looks terrible.
Sep 25, 2012 01:55:17 #
Yep and that 1.5 sure works both ways. That's why my 70x300 realy is 400mm on the image.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.