Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Need advise, may be loosing it due to quarantine!
Page <<first <prev 6 of 12 next> last>>
Jun 29, 2020 13:13:10   #
davidb1879
 
RE: Senior Techie. Like Thomas 902, I own a Nikon AF-P 70-300 lens and find that the image quality is quite good. Davidb1879.

Reply
Jun 29, 2020 13:20:11   #
jeffhacker Loc: Dallas, Texas
 
senior techie wrote:
Need sound advise. I am 73 years old 5'3" and 130 lbs woman. I have been back packing my camera equipment around the world, until lately of course. There are occasions where I would find it getting a bit difficult to carry 20+ pounds of equipment around all day. I have a Nikon D750 and a number of lenses, the heaviest is my Tamron 70-200. I want to hear all the pros and cons of the Leica Q2. It is quite a leap, financially, but it sounds like a less exhausting way to maximize my love of photography and travel. I know there're occasion where my Nikon will be the way to go, but will I enjoy the ease and comfort of a high end point and shoot.
Need sound advise. I am 73 years old 5'3" an... (show quote)


I just upgraded from my Nikon D500 to a Nikon Z6 mirrorless. Lens situation ultimately left me with the kit 24-70 f/4 lens, and because I have the FTZ adapter, I kept my DX 18-300 f/3.5-f/5.6 telephoto and f/1.4 50 mm prime - so I'm actually carrying around more weight. BUT, not always - on those occasions when I just want to "grab and go", I'm carrying around much less weight - just a couple of batteries (because Mirrorless cameras use more juice, and quicker), and a tripod (sometimes) and Nikon Speedlight flash (again, sometimes). As Nikon introduces more Z mount lenses, I'll probably upgrade to a bigger telephoto (the 70-200mm f/2.8 looks good to me but costs almost as much as I paid for the new camera. But so far I'm quite happy. (I'm a guy, but 72 so close to your age for the carrying a bunch of stuff around consideration :-) ).

Reply
Jun 29, 2020 13:27:15   #
tomcat
 
bikerguy wrote:
I could not disagree more tomcat. My wife and I were 72 when we switched from Canon to Olympus. Yes, there is a learning curve. We spent about an hour a day at home for two weeks simply playing with the camera to learn its menu and other tools. There is nothing better than photography for seniors, it requires thought and learning and physical activity. The Olympus does so much that the menu system is considered one of the most complex yet we learned enough to use the cameras very well and find the unusual or infrequently used modes that are built in. Never stop learning and NEVER say I am too old to learn.
I could not disagree more tomcat. My wife and I we... (show quote)


My bucket list is full and with so many things to do, I won't take time to learn Sony's archaic menu. Olympus is fine because I once had a smaller model for walking around. But it didn't take very good pix at night and low light, so I traded it for a Nikkor lens. Thanks for the "words of encouragement", but I have many roads to travel and so I will go home with the "one that brung me". My wife and I are planning on our 50 states USA tour this Fall. She will take her Nikon D500 and I'll take my D750, D3s, and Z6---Nikon all the way, so we can concentrate on the moment and not the new menu.

Reply
 
 
Jun 29, 2020 13:29:22   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
tomcat wrote:
My wife and I are planning on our 50 states USA tour this Fall. She will take her Nikon D500 and I'll take my D750, D3s, and Z6---Nikon all the way, so we can concentrate on the moment and not the new menu.


Are you touring in an RV? If not, how do you plan to stay safe, especially with the need to use public toilets?

Reply
Jun 29, 2020 13:45:33   #
E.L.. Shapiro Loc: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
 
Some practical, perhaps anticlimactic, advice. Consider this before you go out and spend lots of money on new or lighter gear.

I am 76 years old and I am still working, full time, as a commercial photographer. Back in the olden days, all my gear was heavy. There was a time when I worked on locations with 3 Hasselblad (medium format) camera on my person- 2 on a neck strap and one on a shoulder strap. Back in the late 60s, I word as a press photographer and that entailed 3 Nikons and some big lenses. Nowadays, for location work, I use multiple Canon bodies and various lenses. OK- I'm still pretty sturdy for an old man with a gray beard but here's the caveat:

A good part of my work is industrial photography in kinda difficult conditions- shooting pictures of "heavy" equipment, in factories, demolition, and construction job sites, working from cherry pickers, ledges, and other elevation devices or on the ground in muddy trenches. Point is- there is no way I can move around efficiently and quickly with 20+ lbs of gear, nor do I want to change lenses in places with airborne particles- sawdust, cement dust, smoke, and welding ash, and embers.

My solution was to carry one body and a zoom lens that can address most situations. Now- I like ALL my lenses but carrying around all of that stuff is impractical and would only bog me down and distract me from concentrating on all the fast occurring actions that need to be covered. I have no difficulty lifting heavy stuff and I am still relatively agile with a decent sense of balance but at the end of the day- bring out the liniment and the anti-inflammatories! I pay- the next day!

Too many photographers tend to attempt to solve their performance and photographic results issues by continuously changing gear. Many are worried that zoom lenses not quite as good (performance-wise) as primes. One would think that everyone is producing photo murals or display all the images on the Jumbotron at the nearest sports arena. With my Canon 24-105mm, I can count the pebbles in the gravel in a 24x30 display print.

On vacation trips. I used to carry a ton of gear and perhaps, in retrospect, may have missed some great impromptu images having to truck around and manage all that stuff.

At the onset of the pandemic, I locked down for a few weeks- stoped hauling around heavy gear- I still brig van-loads or certain location jobs, the gym was shut down, and when a began to get back to work... Oh- the PAIN! I proved the theory that "if you don't use it, you lose it"! I had to start "working out at home". I got those rusty dumbells out of the cellar and made like Arnold Schwarzenegger- my wife makes fun of me and says I'm gonna suffer a hernia!

Masks aren't new to me- I work in places with hazardous atmospheres. I have a supply of N-95s in my camera bags. I tell the fools that won't mask up in the midst of a pandemic that at least I can see the dust and soot on a job site- you can't see the VIRUS.

I hope you are not suffering from any rheumatological issues and that you are staying safe and healthy. So, you just may want to consider lighting your load without severely lighting your bank account. Thank you for your service as an RN. I am fortunate enough not to have spent too much time in the hospital, however, on my one stay after some minor surgery, I know that y'all are the best and do all of the HARD work!




(Download)

Reply
Jun 29, 2020 13:47:38   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
senior techie wrote:
Thanks for your information. Will research.


I still love my D500 with the 200-500 on it and I really love my new Z7, but I put together a complete Micro 4/3 system based around a Panasonic G9 for travel and shooting from my kayak. It’s also become my hiking camera.

Reply
Jun 29, 2020 13:51:03   #
senior techie Loc: Boca Raton Fl
 
ORpilot wrote:
here is another rental shop. At $79 for 7 days, some people spend more than that on coffee for 7 days. I have used this company several times. They are good people.
https://www.lensrentals.com/rent/photo/leica/cameras


with discount of 10% the 7 day rental is $225.00. About the same as BorrowLens.com. My local camera shop is getting one for me to try out, of course not 7 days. Thanks for thinking of me.

Reply
 
 
Jun 29, 2020 13:53:32   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
My rig (Nikon D850 plus all Nikon 50mm, 70-300mm,16-35mm, 24-80mm, 28-300mm, 24-120mm and backpack bag) weighs 18 pounds. I carry the D800e and 200-500mm separately for obvious reasons. The treks are shorter than they used to be!

Reply
Jun 29, 2020 13:58:24   #
senior techie Loc: Boca Raton Fl
 
jaycoffman wrote:
I'm sorry that I don't have any experience with the Leica Q2. I do have an affection for the Leica brand as my last film camera was a Leica and I loved it.

Moving on I have a perspective that drives me. I am a 73 year old male who shot with Nikon dslr for years. The equipment started getting heavy on different trips--specially on mountain paths and boats so I decided to go with something lighter. (I would also mention that the weight limits on small planes was also a consideration.) I decided to go mirrorless but like many of my decisions things went amok. I wound up changing from a crop sensor Nikon to a full frame mirrorless Sony with Sony lenses. I haven't helped that much with weight but the real advantage is that the change gave me a new perspective on photography and I believe my pictures are better. At least it injected a new energy into my photography.

So my perspective is that you can teach and old dog new tricks and it's really fun to learn a whole new approach to your pictures. I think you have a lot of good reasons to switch to the Leica Q2 or some other similar Leica that will give you what you want. I wish you great shooting and like you, I'm dying to be able to travel again when we can. Happy travels and shooting...
I'm sorry that I don't have any experience with th... (show quote)


You may be my twin brother, photography wise that is. My local camera store is letting me tryout the Leica Q2 to see how it handles. One of my greatest joys at our age is to look forward to all that is out there and to be reenergized and learn new things about that which I have always loved. Wishing you Happy Trails and stay safe
Norma

Reply
Jun 29, 2020 14:02:43   #
NormanTheGr8 Loc: Racine, Wisconsin
 
You could go Fuji

Reply
Jun 29, 2020 14:04:41   #
senior techie Loc: Boca Raton Fl
 
cambriaman wrote:
My rig (Nikon D850 plus all Nikon 50mm, 70-300mm,16-35mm, 24-80mm, 28-300mm, 24-120mm and backpack bag) weighs 18 pounds. I carry the D800e and 200-500mm separately for obvious reasons. The treks are shorter than they used to be!


I can walk for miles in the city terrain, but my trip to Antartica with boots ,parker, et al and rugged snow and icy mountains, I realized I ain't no spring chicken any more. So having lighter options will allow me to keep on doing what I love. I hear you!!!

Reply
 
 
Jun 29, 2020 14:06:35   #
senior techie Loc: Boca Raton Fl
 
I could indeed. I am looking at a few options.

Reply
Jun 29, 2020 14:36:22   #
Doc Barry Loc: Huntsville, Alabama USA
 
ORpilot wrote:
On doing more research, There is also the Leica C-Lux. It also compact camera but a larger sensor and longer zoom than the D-Lux7. I would rent one of the Leicas for a week or so before taking the dive. If you are able to visit a real Camera store then you may be able to bypass the rental. A timex and a Rolex both keep good time. Hold a Timex to your ear and listen. Hold a Rolex to you ear. One sounds like a truck and the other sounds like an Indy race car. You can see, hear, and feel the differance in a Leica. If I could afford Leica Cameras and Lenses I would. I afford the best I can so my equipment is Zeiss lenses on Sony bodies.
https://us.leica-camera.com/Photography/Compact-Cameras/Leica-C-Lux/Details
On doing more research, There is also the Leica C-... (show quote)


Hmmmm…. I wear a $30 Casio watch and my son wears a $5,000 Rolex. He is frustrated that my watch keeps better time than his fancy watch. So I spend my money on toys for my photography interests instead. Actually I'm spending his inheritance as I tell him since I'm sure he would waste my money on worthless watches and stuff like that. To our OP, figure out what you want to purchase for whatever reason and get it! When I took a almost month tour of China a decade ago with my wife, the carry-on rules of 5 pound max (quite strongly enforced in domestic travel) kept me from carrying my D3 and lenses. So I got the best Canon compact/pocket camera available then and was sad I didn't have my D3. But as I learned to use the Canon, I was able to take over a thousand quite good photographs that we were happy with. Of course the quality would have been better with the D3 with its suite of Nikon lenses, but the Canon photos were more than adequately good. Since then, I haven't taken a trip (or will not) where I can't take my D810 and collection of lenses.

Reply
Jun 29, 2020 15:01:15   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
ORpilot wrote:
As my RN wife told a similar to you person in the grocery store line yesterday. Sir, would you rather wear a mask today or a ventilator tube tomorrow.
Play safe

Sorry about getting off subject. But national health is everyone's concern.


Just a note from an implant tech. Masks are not designed to protect the wearer but to prevent spread to others in close proximity. So maintain a safer distance than 6 feet, maybe 10 feet. When outside 10 feet away, reduces the risk to less than the risk of driving to the venue

Reply
Jun 29, 2020 15:23:37   #
geezer7 Loc: Michigan
 
senior techie wrote:
Need sound advise. I am 73 years old 5'3" and 130 lbs woman. I have been back packing my camera equipment around the world, until lately of course. There are occasions where I would find it getting a bit difficult to carry 20+ pounds of equipment around all day. I have a Nikon D750 and a number of lenses, the heaviest is my Tamron 70-200. I want to hear all the pros and cons of the Leica Q2. It is quite a leap, financially, but it sounds like a less exhausting way to maximize my love of photography and travel. I know there're occasion where my Nikon will be the way to go, but will I enjoy the ease and comfort of a high end point and shoot.
Need sound advise. I am 73 years old 5'3" an... (show quote)


You should follow your instincts and buy what you really want. If you don't you'll probably regret it! The only advice I have is to spend some time using only a 28mm (or zoom equivalent) lens to see if you can work with just a medium wide angle lens! Since the Leica Q2 is a fixed lens camera you'll have to deal with a single prime lens. Undoubtedly this is a fine camera and will perform magnificently. You should enjoy it!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.