Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Suggestions needed for purchasing accessories.
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Apr 9, 2020 17:54:35   #
ehall123 Loc: From Philly live in Tucson
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
I happily shot with a 75-300 for years, before I "learned" is wasn't any good. The drawback is the lack of IS, but I used a tripod or monopod most of the time, again not knowing any better (sarcasm).

Your 18-55 is a fine lens. I mentioned the longer 18-135 lens to put a lens on your body you'd really not have to take off except when changing to some flavor of an 70-300 zoom.

Looking at your Alaska pictures, the idea I mentioned about shooting parameters could help. But, you're getting great results already, even in grey light that is a challenge for all cameras. You could 'punch up' the color and contrast in the camera slightly, or make some quick & basic edits on the computer later. You might find working on your editing is better than any new equipment.

I don't have a lot of older work loaded to Flickr and have been using some of this downtime to revisit older images in my catalog. Here's something from a 75-300 lens. Like I said, before I know better ...

DC Blossoms by Paul Sager, on Flickr
I happily shot with a 75-300 for years, before I &... (show quote)


That is a beautiful image! I like how the one budding flower is in clear focus and others are in the background. I understand what you mean by you "learned" that it wasn't any good. I have too much time on my hands right now, reading about expert views on my equipment.

You guys have convinced me to stay with my Canon T7! Until I run into situations where it can't do what I want it to do. (I'm guessing, low light situations, or certain types of fast action shots)

I am interested in how I could punch up the color and contrast of some of my shots. What area of the menu on the T7 would I look at to do this?

What would you recommend as a good photo editing tool that is not complicated and is inexpensive?

Anyway, thank you all for your much needed guidance and expertise.

Reply
Apr 9, 2020 18:11:14   #
ehall123 Loc: From Philly live in Tucson
 
bleirer wrote:
It's always technique over tech. I would make sure you have done everything you can do before blaming the gear. Sure it makes a difference but top technique and knowledge trumps better gear every time.

Try setting up a perfect test shot on the gear you have. Use a tripod or put the camera on a picnic table. Choose a nice bright day with the sun at your back. Pick something colorful to take a picture of, set the ISO at 100 or 200, aperture at f8, shutter at whatever the meter tells you. Focus super carefully. Use the 10 second timer to allow the camera to settle down.

If you are still unhappy with the quality of your 'ideal' shot, then it's time to upgrade your gear.
It's always technique over tech. I would make s... (show quote)


That is great advice! Thank you, I will do this.

Reply
Apr 9, 2020 18:17:57   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
ehall123 wrote:
That is a beautiful image! I like how the one budding flower is in clear focus and others are in the background. I understand what you mean by you "learned" that it wasn't any good. I have too much time on my hands right now, reading about expert views on my equipment.

You guys have convinced me to stay with my Canon T7! Until I run into situations where it can't do what I want it to do. (I'm guessing, low light situations, or certain types of fast action shots)

I am interested in how I could punch up the color and contrast of some of my shots. What area of the menu on the T7 would I look at to do this?

What would you recommend as a good photo editing tool that is not complicated and is inexpensive?

Anyway, thank you all for your much needed guidance and expertise.
That is a beautiful image! I like how the one budd... (show quote)


Your EOS T7 has a few ways of doing much the same:

1) Use the shooting mode on the camera that matches your situation, such as the Landscape for Landscapes, etc. See page 68 of your manual for details.

2) Use the WB setting that matches to your situation, Sun for Sun and Shadows for Shadows, etc. See page 131 of your manual for details.

3) Use the Standard Picture Style, but increase the saturation, sharpening and contrast. See page 76 for when the Standard Picture Style is available. Page 126 discusses making adjustments. Try making Saturation = +1 (one move to right of zero), Sharpness = 4 and Contrast = +1 (one move to right of zero). Use the Standard Style for a day / week rather than 'auto' and see if you like the results. They'll be subtle, you may want even more adjustments.

Reply
 
 
Apr 9, 2020 18:55:56   #
FreddB Loc: PA - Delaware County
 
ehall123 wrote:
I have not done any post processing yet. I don't have good editing software at this point. I really don't want to spend more than $400 for a lens, considering the camera was $500 with both lenses included.
Thanks for you reply.


Yeah, but your next camera will justify the cost of THIS lens, etc, etc ☺

Reply
Apr 9, 2020 19:34:05   #
ehall123 Loc: From Philly live in Tucson
 
FreddB wrote:
Yeah, but your next camera will justify the cost of THIS lens, etc, etc ☺


Yeah, I think I get it.... LOL. The problem I have, I think, is way too much time on my hands right now. Going a little stir crazy. I have a best buy gift card, so I think I'm going to try the 18-135mm canon lens. That will serve as my main go to, all in one lens for now.

Reply
Apr 9, 2020 21:16:14   #
johngault007 Loc: Florida Panhandle
 
ehall123 wrote:
Yeah, I think I get it.... LOL. The problem I have, I think, is way too much time on my hands right now. Going a little stir crazy. I have a best buy gift card, so I think I'm going to try the 18-135mm canon lens. That will serve as my main go to, all in one lens for now.


Good choice!

Reply
Apr 9, 2020 22:37:23   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
ehall123 wrote:
Yeah, I think I get it.... LOL. The problem I have, I think, is way too much time on my hands right now. Going a little stir crazy. I have a best buy gift card, so I think I'm going to try the 18-135mm canon lens. That will serve as my main go to, all in one lens for now.


For your next lens after that I suggest a macro, for during those "lock down" times or bad weather when you can't go out. A few lights, something for a back ground (cloth, leather etc) maybe a large box as a small "studio" (cover sides with paper, cloth or paint them) and some small subjects, coins, models, toys, jewelry, a potted indoor plant/flower even that cricket you found in the garage. And you are in business as a "Macro Photographer" Lot of books and online articles and tutorial videos to teach you how. Like: https://photographylife.com/macro-photography-tutorial There are lots of others, just Google "Macro Photography".

Here are samples, the background is a micro fiber lens cleaning cloth and the whole "studio" is less than 6" x 6". Subjects are dandelion seed heads as puff ball and after a bit of wind.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Apr 10, 2020 00:56:27   #
ehall123 Loc: From Philly live in Tucson
 
robertjerl wrote:
For your next lens after that I suggest a macro, for during those "lock down" times or bad weather when you can't go out. A few lights, something for a back ground (cloth, leather etc) maybe a large box as a small "studio" (cover sides with paper, cloth or paint them) and some small subjects, coins, models, toys, jewelry, a potted indoor plant/flower even that cricket you found in the garage. And you are in business as a "Macro Photographer" Lot of books and online articles and tutorial videos to teach you how. Like: https://photographylife.com/macro-photography-tutorial There are lots of others, just Google "Macro Photography".

Here are samples, the background is a micro fiber lens cleaning cloth and the whole "studio" is less than 6" x 6". Subjects are dandelion seed heads as puff ball and after a bit of wind.
For your next lens after that I suggest a macro, f... (show quote)


Beautiful images! I never really thought that much about macro photography. That is a great idea! Thank you.

Reply
Apr 10, 2020 06:51:42   #
tankdonovan Loc: Tennessee
 
ehall123 wrote:
I have not done any post processing yet. I don't have good editing software at this point. I really don't want to spend more than $400 for a lens, considering the camera was $500 with both lenses included.
Thanks for you reply.


You have great editing software that came with your camera Canon`s DPP

Reply
Apr 10, 2020 07:26:55   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
ehall123 wrote:
I bought the Canon T7 in November specifically for a trip to Alaska, and also just to get back into taking pictures . I posted photos a while back from that trip. I was second guessing myself a bit and thought the Nikon D5600 might have been a better choice. (All the reviews say the pictures the Nikon produces have extreme clarity) But assuming I stay with the T7, since I have had the chance to get used to the camera a little bit, I was wondering if you'll could recommend some things that might enhance my picture taking. Lens, filters, lens hood, etc.

I found a Canon 70-300mm IS USM lens at Abes for about $345. Would that take better pictures then the lens that came with the camera because it has the IS? I started down this road in someone else's thread but didn't want to hijack that persons discussion, so I am starting a new one here. If it helps, my interests in photos include, but not limited to, scenic landscapes, mountains, canyons, beaches, nature/ wildlife, basically, whatever scene might make a good picture.
Thanks.
Earl
I bought the Canon T7 in November specifically for... (show quote)


DO NOT PASS GO, DON'T TUG ON SUPERMAN'S CAPE, DON'T SPITE INTO THE WIND, DON"T MESS AROUND WITH JIM AND DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH ABES.

Reply
Apr 10, 2020 07:46:17   #
ggab Loc: ?
 
ehall123 wrote:
I bought the Canon T7 in November specifically for a trip to Alaska, and also just to get back into taking pictures . I posted photos a while back from that trip. I was second guessing myself a bit and thought the Nikon D5600 might have been a better choice. (All the reviews say the pictures the Nikon produces have extreme clarity) But assuming I stay with the T7, since I have had the chance to get used to the camera a little bit, I was wondering if you'll could recommend some things that might enhance my picture taking. Lens, filters, lens hood, etc.

I found a Canon 70-300mm IS USM lens at Abes for about $345. Would that take better pictures then the lens that came with the camera because it has the IS? I started down this road in someone else's thread but didn't want to hijack that persons discussion, so I am starting a new one here. If it helps, my interests in photos include, but not limited to, scenic landscapes, mountains, canyons, beaches, nature/ wildlife, basically, whatever scene might make a good picture.
Thanks.
Earl
I bought the Canon T7 in November specifically for... (show quote)


Can we assume you have the 75-300mm lens?
Can we also assume you saw the 70-300 IS USM II lens?

If both assumptions are correct, you will get much better results from the 70-300 IS USM II lens. The results will continue to get better as you get better as a photographer.

Regarding Abes, you have been given the answer.
Google "Canon Price Watch" for legit offers from legit sources on all things Canon Camera.

Reply
 
 
Apr 10, 2020 08:09:35   #
Kiriakos
 
PixelStan77 wrote:
Earl, Run do not walk away from Abe's. They hooked you by price. Check out a bible against Abes have been written here. Buy from a reputable dealer like B&H or Adorama.


You did not answer his actual question, a usual practice in this forum.

Reply
Apr 10, 2020 08:32:32   #
lsaguy Loc: Udall, KS, USA
 
My suggestion would be to go to KEH.com and set the filters for the lenses you want to look at. I only buy EX when there's a sale on, otherwise I go for BGN or even UG. KEH's condition ratings are EXTREMELY conservative. The very first lens I bought from them was rated UG and when it arrived I was simply amazed. The plastic had some UV fading but otherwise it was pristine and it worked beautifully. IF you want to save some money KEH is the place to go.

Rick

Reply
Apr 10, 2020 08:49:24   #
LarryFitz Loc: Beacon NY
 
Check out refurbished ep-s lens at Canon website. I am using their Macro 35 1:2.8 IS STM lens as my go to lens. Also have the Canon 55-250 EF-s. Very seldom use the kit lens that came with camera. Next Lens will be a wide angle and/or niffy fifty.

Reply
Apr 10, 2020 09:00:40   #
D-5008 Loc: Raleigh, North Carolina
 
Something that has not been suggested yet is to shoot in jpeg and RAW to start with. This will allow you much greater control when you decide to get into editing. Memory cards are cheap these days and IMHO the only reason not to shoot in RAW is when shooting action shots in continuous mode. In the end you will probably end up just shooting RAW if you enjoy editing. Good luck with your endeavors.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.