Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Hyperlocal markings on digital camera lenses?
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jan 22, 2020 09:10:49   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
Longshadow wrote:
So much quicker to glance at the scale than review, enlarge, enlarge, left, up, up, look, analyze, close.....



Reply
Jan 22, 2020 09:20:44   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Very close. That's the setting for enthusiastically taking photographs no further away than one's front or back yard.
--Bob
WILLARD98407 wrote:
Just being a butthead, I would ask, "How close is a hyperlocal"?

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 10:40:28   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
rb61 wrote:
Why do these marking seem to be missing on most?

1. With autofocus lenses they would be too close together to be readable.
2. On manual focus lenses they only give you a very rough estimate of DOF.

In either case they are relatively useless.

Reply
 
 
Jan 22, 2020 10:42:00   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
selmslie wrote:
1. With autofocus lenses they would be too close together to be readable.
2. On manual focus lenses they only give you a very rough estimate of DOF.

In either case they are relatively useless.


Good for ball-parking...

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 10:47:59   #
NCMtnMan Loc: N. Fork New River, Ashe Co., NC
 
If having this info would be useful, then I would suggest you purchase PhotoPills for your smartphone or pad. It has this and much more for just about any body and lens combination. It's only $10 and well worth it.

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 11:00:13   #
Fredrick Loc: Former NYC, now San Francisco Bay Area
 
Longshadow wrote:
So much quicker to glance at the scale than review, enlarge, enlarge, left, up, up, look, analyze, close.....


Agreed. I definitely miss those markings on my primes.

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 11:33:30   #
Nicholas DeSciose
 
You might be surprised how much infrared photography is being done. A lot of people are converting cameras to Infared. I believe that a company called life pixels Is that largest in the industry

Reply
 
 
Jan 22, 2020 11:52:27   #
CatMarley Loc: North Carolina
 
rb61 wrote:
Why do these marking seem to be missing on most?


The only lenses where hyperfocal markings would be useful are wide angle primes. Both my wide angle primes have hyperfocal markings on them.

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 12:54:42   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
CatMarley wrote:
The only lenses where hyperfocal markings would be useful are wide angle primes. Both my wide angle primes have hyperfocal markings on them.

My wide angle lenses have so much depth of field that the markings are mostly inconsequential. With longer focal lengths, the distance markings and depth of field scales on my Leica R prime lenses are accurate and very useful. I’m not familiar with any lens with hyperfocal markings.

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 13:08:29   #
rcarol
 
Longshadow wrote:
So much quicker to glance at the scale than review, enlarge, enlarge, left, up, up, look, analyze, close.....


The problem with the DOF scales that were engraved on dinosaur lenses is that it relied on the manufacturer's determination as to what was an acceptable "circle of confusion".

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 13:24:38   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
rcarol wrote:
The problem with the DOF scales that were engraved on dinosaur lenses is that it relied on the manufacturer's determination as to what was an acceptable "circle of confusion".

Haha.
I must be inside that circle.

I use the marks to give me an idea of the DOF,
I don't work with no stinkin' circles.

Reply
 
 
Jan 22, 2020 13:25:51   #
rcarol
 
Longshadow wrote:
Haha.
I must be inside that circle.

I use the marks to give me an idea of the DOF,
I don't work with no stinkin' circles.

Good to know.

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 13:30:57   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
With autofocus they’re rather superfluous. Yes, I’d still like them for manually focusing landscapes, but in most cases I’m using autofocus and just putting my focus point where I want it.

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 13:39:36   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
With autofocus they’re rather superfluous. Yes, I’d still like them for manually focusing landscapes, but in most cases I’m using autofocus and just putting my focus point where I want it.


They are to see how much depth of field you are getting at a given aperture. That applies whether you are focusing manually or autofocus.

Reply
Jan 22, 2020 13:41:10   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
They are to see how much depth of field you are getting at a given aperture. That applies whether you are focusing manually or autofocus.

...or at least give you an idea.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.