If having this info would be useful, then I would suggest you purchase PhotoPills for your smartphone or pad. It has this and much more for just about any body and lens combination. It's only $10 and well worth it.
You might be surprised how much infrared photography is being done. A lot of people are converting cameras to Infared. I believe that a company called life pixels Is that largest in the industry
The only lenses where hyperfocal markings would be useful are wide angle primes. Both my wide angle primes have hyperfocal markings on them.
My wide angle lenses have so much depth of field that the markings are mostly inconsequential. With longer focal lengths, the distance markings and depth of field scales on my Leica R prime lenses are accurate and very useful. I’m not familiar with any lens with hyperfocal markings.
So much quicker to glance at the scale than review, enlarge, enlarge, left, up, up, look, analyze, close.....
The problem with the DOF scales that were engraved on dinosaur lenses is that it relied on the manufacturer's determination as to what was an acceptable "circle of confusion".
The problem with the DOF scales that were engraved on dinosaur lenses is that it relied on the manufacturer's determination as to what was an acceptable "circle of confusion".
Haha. I must be inside that circle.
I use the marks to give me an idea of the DOF, I don't work with no stinkin' circles.
With autofocus they’re rather superfluous. Yes, I’d still like them for manually focusing landscapes, but in most cases I’m using autofocus and just putting my focus point where I want it.
With autofocus they’re rather superfluous. Yes, I’d still like them for manually focusing landscapes, but in most cases I’m using autofocus and just putting my focus point where I want it.
They are to see how much depth of field you are getting at a given aperture. That applies whether you are focusing manually or autofocus.