Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon Batteries
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Jan 19, 2020 14:51:20   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
RichieC wrote:
Nikon stuff costs a premium, until you compare them to performance.

ie cable release... I bought three off brand releases because I thought $65 Was a stupid expensive amount to spend on something like this... after those 3 failed quickly and suddenly, ( me without one and using it often) I bought the Nikon brand.. still have it after many years now. So it would have been much cheaper to have bought it in the first place.

The batteries are little computers in themselves. They provide the same amount of energy to the camera no matter their charge status. AS I am in the habit of turning off my camera between shots, I have never seen the need to buy a second battery. The only time it is an issue is when shooting tethered, or in assembly line product shots, where I am shooting multiple items on the same background camera mounted on a tripod etc. . I just watch it and recharge when I need a break anyways. I would use a power supply if I did it often enough.

Anyways, my battery is the same one I bought with my D800e when they first came out. I check the "remaining batter life" feature and will replace it when it becomes a concern. Until then- its been a fantastically worthwhile purchase ( It came with the camera), and have never needed a backup. even on my trips to Europe ( I'd recharge every night to top it off) or the back country away from electricity, where like I said I am in the habit of instantly flipping off the camera between shots.

This is my work flow though, and to be even faier- I have mostly prime lenses- so no power to the lens other than a readout, others may need a backup and once I forgot the battery in the charger all together- but that was my brainfart fault- not the batteries.
Nikon stuff costs a premium, until you compare the... (show quote)


So Nikon primes do not have AF? Interesting.

Reply
Jan 19, 2020 17:40:08   #
RichieC Loc: Adirondacks
 
Architect1776 wrote:
So Nikon primes do not have AF? Interesting.


Zeiss primes don't , my Milvus 21 and or Milvus 85 is on camera 95% of the time- forgot to mention that. My 105 or 50 do have autofocus. And my one zoom 80-400 does, but I rarely use that one, it was a gift :)

Only mentioned this as perhaps a good reason I don't go through much as battery as I originally expected... then decided against a backup all together.

Reply
Jan 19, 2020 18:55:52   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
RichieC wrote:
Zeiss primes don't , my Milvus 21 and or Milvus 85 is on camera 95% of the time- forgot to mention that. My 105 or 50 do have autofocus. And my one zoom 80-400 does, but I rarely use that one, it was a gift :)

Only mentioned this as perhaps a good reason I don't go through much as battery as I originally expected... then decided against a backup all together.


Due to an old business agreement between Minolta and Zeiss, Zeiss now makes AUTO FOCUS lenses for only Sony. And boy, are they ever good.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.