gvarner wrote:
Porn is porn. Trying to portray it as art is an attempt to legitimize it.
Yep, and since nobody looks at it, it's only the most widespread thing on the internet.
gpc wrote:
What's a "banana duct"?
What MT meant was if a banana were taped (by using duct tape) to the wall...
I got it buddy. JUNK art!
MrMophoto
Loc: Rhode Island "The biggest little"
Thoughts on Maplethorp; Subject matter aside, he was an amazing photographer. I saw a show of his orchid photos that were simply inspiring. He had a sense of lighting and composition that transcended the dubious subject his later work is known for. Personnally I'm not a fan of the subject of his later work but as a photographer I can certainly appreciate the technical and compositional aspects.
I was wondering where this thread was going to go
MrMophoto
Loc: Rhode Island "The biggest little"
Thoughts on Maplethorp; Subject matter aside, he was an amazing photographer. I saw a show of his orchid photos that were simply inspiring. He had a sense of lighting and composition that transcended the dubious subject his later work is known for. Personnally I'm not a fan of the subject of his later work but as a photographer I can certainly appreciate the technical and compositional aspects.
I was wondering where this thread was going to go
I finally got it when FTn mentioned pun. Excellent groaner (not a moaner).
being 81 and my shit not working anymore, porn and a good memory help get me through the day.
there's good and bad porn, I decide which is which. I don't smoke or do drugs. booze and porn beatthe hell out of checkers or shuffleboard.
MrMophoto
Loc: Rhode Island "The biggest little"
PhotogHobbyist wrote:
I finally got it when FTn mentioned pun. Excellent groaner (not a moaner).
Would that be a groiner not a groaner?
Ava'sPapa wrote:
What MT meant was if a banana were taped (by using duct tape) to the wall...
What Ava'sPapa meant was "if a banana was taped".
cahale wrote:
What Ava'sPapa meant was "if a banana was taped".
No, what I "meant" was what I said. Grammatically incorrect or not. You don't know what I meant.
Frayud wrote:
Mapplethorp: His prints were works of art in themselves. Absolutely beautiful. I saw it in Florence (Italy) where it was displayed in a school that was evidently closed for summer vacation. People including those of student age wandered thru and left apparently unscathed.
Ava'sPapa wrote:
I saw the Maplethorpe exhibit in Hartford years ago and I have to say that he was an excellent photographer and that I enjoyed the exhibit very much. As far as a man's junk...what do you think of the nude statues by Rodin or Michaelangelo...do you consider those "pornography" ? I don't.
Saw the Mapplethorpe exhibit in Florence at the Galleria dell'Accademia. Right there with Michelangelo's David. Large prints spread across the museum between the sculptures. Exquisite.
First saw his work in the 80s (maybe 70s) at some minor gallery. Beautiful work. Before leaving I sat down and reviewed a book of his. The last couple of images in the book were somewhat different than what was hanging on wall.
Also Oakland Museum of California (1989??). There they also showed his X Portfolio. Yes, controversial.
Printmaker Extraordinaire !
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.