Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Just a question
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Dec 12, 2019 06:28:56   #
John N Loc: HP14 3QF Stokenchurch, UK
 
MT Shooter wrote:
If a banana duct taped to a wall and sells for $120,000 as "art", then I guess pretty much anything goes.


My thoughts exactly. I think the only definition of 'ART' these days is how much can you sell it for. A great disservice to many fine amateurs out there.

Reply
Dec 12, 2019 06:55:38   #
BboH Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
 
Just what is pornography - today?

Reply
Dec 12, 2019 07:31:21   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
ottopj wrote:
Eye of the beholder!



Reply
 
 
Dec 12, 2019 07:48:22   #
Hammer Loc: London UK
 
I really need to consider it. Please send me a lot of examples .

Reply
Dec 12, 2019 08:10:15   #
neillaubenthal
 
gvarner wrote:
Porn is porn. Trying to portray it as art is an attempt to legitimize it.


Depends on what you call porn. Actual sex sure, boobs probably not, genitalia some here would but not all...holding herself open probably yes but just not hidden genitalia I would say no.

Porn is in the eye of the beholder methinks.

Reply
Dec 12, 2019 10:41:16   #
CSand Loc: Fayetteville, Georgia
 
No! Sin! Addiction! Destroyer!

Reply
Dec 12, 2019 11:33:19   #
StanMac Loc: Tennessee
 
MT Shooter wrote:
If a banana duct taped to a wall and sells for $120,000 as "art", then I guess pretty much anything goes.


👍👍

Art, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.

Stan

Reply
 
 
Dec 12, 2019 11:33:28   #
jaycoffman Loc: San Diego
 
It's all in the definitions you use. Both pornography and junk art have no real definition.

Reply
Dec 12, 2019 12:03:24   #
trinhqthuan Loc: gaithersburg
 
MT Shooter wrote:
If a banana duct taped to a wall and sells for $120,000 as "art", then I guess pretty much anything goes.



Reply
Dec 12, 2019 12:50:51   #
truckster Loc: Tampa Bay Area
 
MrMophoto wrote:
I thought the humor was obvious, if I have to explain it's not funny anymore.


I really started to consider the "art" of porn ... now I get it! Funny.

Reply
Dec 12, 2019 14:03:45   #
Frayud Loc: Bethesda,MD
 
Mapplethorp: His prints were works of art in themselves. Absolutely beautiful. An exhibition of his work was shut down by the yapping of congress here in Washington DC. I saw it in Florence (Italy) where it was displayed in a school that was evidently closed for summer vacation. People including those of student age wandered thru and left apparently unscathed.

Reply
 
 
Dec 12, 2019 14:38:40   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
MrMophoto wrote:
Can pornography be considered "junk art"?

Maplethorp?


?? Well, you can name it anything you want!

Reply
Dec 12, 2019 15:35:48   #
Ava'sPapa Loc: Cheshire, Ct.
 
I saw the Maplethorpe exhibit in Hartford years ago and I have to say that he was an excellent photographer and that I enjoyed the exhibit very much. As far as a man's junk...what do you think of the nude statues by Rodin or Michaelangelo...do you consider those "pornography" ? I don't.

Reply
Dec 12, 2019 17:17:06   #
scooter1 Loc: Yacolt, Wa.
 
MT Shooter wrote:
If a banana duct taped to a wall and sells for $120,000 as "art", then I guess pretty much anything goes.


That one was crazy. Heard someone ate the banana also.

Reply
Dec 12, 2019 18:05:31   #
bbradford Loc: Wake Forest NC
 
Personally I thought it was funny

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.