Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Tamron 18-400
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Nov 13, 2019 16:52:07   #
WDCash Loc: Milford, Delaware, USA
 
buckscop wrote:
First let me thank all that replied, especially Alan for the time it took for that reply, very helpful. The reason for f18, was that I was at a preserve in Florida, and among other things, was hoping to get pics of the eagles and ospreys, who often sit on distant trees from the walking paths. Additionally, the park has a tower that overlooks not only the estuary where the women was, but in the distance (see attached pic) was the Tampa Skyway Bridge (f18 @265mm). I was shooting the bridge when the women appeared out of the mangroves, and amateur as I was, did not think of an aperture change.

Regarding the filter. I was led to believe that having a filter helped 'protect' the lens. Out of the ones suggested, polarizing was one. Since I'm a 'blue sky' guy ;), I went with the polarizing one and basically leave it on all the time. To those more learned, is this not really suggested for the reasons already given?


Thanks all, learning alot.
First let me thank all that replied, especially Al... (show quote)


I thought the same thing about filters and the polarizing filter in particular. Folks here convinces me to try some shots without them. Well they were actually a little more forceful about it. Anyway you will be amazed at how much better your pictures will turn out. Of course there are times when a circular polarizing filter is called for. But so far I have found, for me, I can add it in post if necessary or desirable and maintain better IQ ands more light to the sensor.

As for protection please watch this. https://backcountrygallery.com/all-about-uv-filters/

Reply
Nov 13, 2019 17:00:56   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
buckscop wrote:
For those considering the Tamron 18-400, this is a sample of an image taken at 400mm (AP, 1/640, f18, ISO 1250 auto). The image is the full non-cropped shot from my Canon T7i, with a Polarizing filter. I was pleased with the quality.


Very nice photo.
Lens does very well for such a large zoom range.
Thank you for sharing.

Reply
Nov 13, 2019 17:09:38   #
jsfphotos Loc: New York, NY
 
knelso4 wrote:
Check for front / back focus before reaching any conclusions. That is documented in many places, and not all that hard to do. (Infinity is a bit tougher than 1.5 and 8 feet -- and is where mine failed. Fixed lens or replacement arrives tomorrow).

You can also try live view vs viewfinder. The auto focus mechanism is different, and live view should be better - but slower.



I typically use back-button focus. Never thought that that could affect how fast is focuses, but maybe I'll do some re-setting and play around with it. Thanks!

Reply
 
 
Nov 13, 2019 19:42:03   #
DeanS Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
 
I shoot this lens on a Canon crop body and have not been disappointed.

Reply
Nov 14, 2019 00:11:36   #
Wallen Loc: Middle Earth
 
Haydon wrote:
Zooms do come with advantages and disadvantages but the caveats of sharpness are often traded off at certain focal lengths. Equally I'm not very fond of variable apertures but to conserve space and size when I travel, I use a 70-300 4/5.6. I don't consider this a great shot but it illustrates the sharpness levels that can be easily achieved after a little post work. Shot at minimum Fstop at F5.6 at 300mm IS0 100 at 1/100 sec handheld. I realize IQ is extremely subjective but for myself, this is what I prefer at a minimum. Thank you for sharing btw. It's good to see people trying to give others a representation of what can be achieved with any given lens.
Zooms do come with advantages and disadvantages bu... (show quote)


Just curious, why does it have a circular (stair-steps) banding?

Reply
Nov 14, 2019 00:48:08   #
Haydon
 
Wallen wrote:
Just curious, why does it have a circular (stair-steps) banding?


Probably because you're using a lower bit rate monitor.

Reply
Nov 14, 2019 00:52:13   #
tonyjag Loc: Bolton, Ma.
 
Strodav wrote:
Have the Nikon version of the Tamron 18-400mm and am happy with it given a few caveats. My lens needed tuning, but once tuned it is sharp over the whole zoom range. The focus ring turns when AF is active, you have to turn off AF on the lens to use manual focus and there is some chromatic aberration and distortion, which are easily corrected in PP. On the other hand, VR works great and the lens is light and compact for its versatility. I especially like it for family vacations when I don't want to take a lot of equipment with me. Enjoy!
Have the Nikon version of the Tamron 18-400mm and ... (show quote)


I agree with your observations, using an 18-400 with my D7500. Another advantage I don't recall seeing in this thread is that it works with the Tamron Tap-In Console. Here is how that worked out, mostly good.
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-604962-1.html

Reply
 
 
Nov 14, 2019 03:45:02   #
Wallen Loc: Middle Earth
 
Haydon wrote:
Probably because you're using a lower bit rate monitor.


I was able to blend it in PS. If it was the monitor, it would show the same banding if blended.
Other images i'm viewing do not show the effect either.

The banding seems to be embedded in the image.

Reply
Nov 14, 2019 11:58:16   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Keep working on your technique. I will tell you that spot metering isn't going to get you any awards when it comes to exposure. Try changing to Evaluative metering. This is best to get the whole image to be exposed correctly, not just the dog, which by the way, is the only thing in your image this is perfectly exposed. Cameras don't see what the human eye can see. So it's best to expose the entire image and not just one subject like the dog. That is, unless you plan to crop in on the dog only. Then spot metering would be appropriate. Also, make sure you use a single focus point and make sure you use AI-Servo. NEVER use AI-Focus. That's the biggest mistake that Canon made/makes for a choice in focus settings. Next time stop down to f/8. No need to stop down as far as you did on this image.

Reply
Nov 16, 2019 12:17:42   #
Ruraldi Loc: Milmay, NJ
 
I was just going to post what everyone thinks of this lens, and when I opened the forum, saw 18-400 Tamron listed. Just went to the Great Smokey Mountain Photography Summit in Townsend, TN. When going out with my roommate to catch some clicks we don't see in NJ, I was carting two cameras with different lens. My roommate had the 18-400 Tammy on her D500 Nikon ( I had a D500 abd D7000). She had a lighter load and covered the majority of the range I did. The only time she changed her lens was for the 3 am star/night class, and she went to her 10-20 Sigma 1.4. I was impressed with the 18-400. I have always used Sigma and Nikon lenses, never Tamron. Like the feedback I'm seeing. Thanks.

Reply
Nov 18, 2019 09:32:30   #
Don W-37 Loc: Bangkok, Thailand
 
Nice photo despite all the naysayers! Keep shooting and keep posting.
Cheers,
Don

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2019 09:32:33   #
Don W-37 Loc: Bangkok, Thailand
 
Nice photo despite all the naysayers! Keep shooting and keep posting.
Cheers,
Don

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.