buckscop wrote:
First let me thank all that replied, especially Alan for the time it took for that reply, very helpful. The reason for f18, was that I was at a preserve in Florida, and among other things, was hoping to get pics of the eagles and ospreys, who often sit on distant trees from the walking paths. Additionally, the park has a tower that overlooks not only the estuary where the women was, but in the distance (see attached pic) was the Tampa Skyway Bridge (f18 @265mm). I was shooting the bridge when the women appeared out of the mangroves, and amateur as I was, did not think of an aperture change.
Regarding the filter. I was led to believe that having a filter helped 'protect' the lens. Out of the ones suggested, polarizing was one. Since I'm a 'blue sky' guy ;), I went with the polarizing one and basically leave it on all the time. To those more learned, is this not really suggested for the reasons already given?
Thanks all, learning alot.
First let me thank all that replied, especially Al... (
show quote)
I thought the same thing about filters and the polarizing filter in particular. Folks here convinces me to try some shots without them. Well they were actually a little more forceful about it. Anyway you will be amazed at how much better your pictures will turn out. Of course there are times when a circular polarizing filter is called for. But so far I have found, for me, I can add it in post if necessary or desirable and maintain better IQ ands more light to the sensor.
As for protection please watch this.