azted wrote:
Here is my problem. You take the same girl who you projected so innocently on day 104, and for the last two days create a low life trollop out of her. I prefer the images that promote a woman's beauty, and relevance in our world. The last two days you have listened to the voice on the wrong shoulder! On top of that, the lighting is not quite professional or artistic. Maybe I am wrong, but I think that uplifting human beings is far more of a benefit to yourself than degrading them.
I believe that what you say is from the heart. I feel there is great merit in having such ideas and opinions with regards to our fellow human beings, even extending it in many respects to the rest of the animals and plant life that abounds.
On the other side of our male beliefs about women we need to understand the women as multidimensional. The human female is by enlarge much more complex than men give them credit for and the long history of repression of the female dimension of the human race needs recognition. In my work I learn by exploring these paths with the women I work with.
With out getting into personalities of the people with whom I work let me offer this. There was a woman who had a tremendous influence on two of the most well know men in her period of time. One was the philosopher/poet Rilke, her lover and confidant.
Rilke:
"There is no Sun without the shadow and it is important to know the night".
One acceptable translation of these ideas here in could be:
"There is no God without the devil and it is important to know evil."
Yet there is another possible interpretation of this classic Rilke line of poetry:
There is no Man without a woman and it is important to know the night."
This where the term 'night' is understood as 'women of the night', also Women of Diana, Women of the fence, the edge of the town, the fence being a symbol of the separation of civilization from the forest. The term 'night' refers to the idea of parthenos.
Now comes the second male in this story, the son of the countess who was the lover and mother of a male child Balthus. At the age of about 8 years old Balthus produced a short story about a cat, the story was influence by the adult Rilke. The story is considered a powerful and magical tale that by many accounts is beyond the capacity of a young mind. Rilke insists as did Balthus mother that the work was her son's and that her lover Rilke only offered guidance in the styling and some editing.
Balthus went on to ripe old age as 'lord of the manner' and more importantly as one of the great 20th century painters. Balthus paintings are still to this day considered extremely controversial. Many of the elements of his themes are interior views of cats with pubescent girls in what are supposed erotic poses. Balthus work is in direct relation to this concept of parthenos as is that of Rilke.
Many are only now beginning to understand the complexity of this idea of parthenos. An example from history of this parthenos would be healing women or witches (but the more traditional idea that is in conflict with Disney and The Church).
So, as usual, long drawn out, historic and all that. But the representation of the 'woman' as more involved and dynamic than just sweet pretty young women is not excusive to my work. To be honest I think the work that I do hits the deep nerves of many viewers who prefer their pedestal view of women not be given over to the deeper more chaotic depth of what women are about. Women have depths that are powerful and challenging to plumb. Women I work with are vary much in control, I do explain what I'm doing and they seem open to the ideas but will they ever admit to these things being about them? Not only NO! But HELL NO! For where can they wrap themselves in the cloak of mystery that all women seem to enjoy!