Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
For Your Consideration
Would like some opinions
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 12, 2019 16:44:22   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
Curmudgeon wrote:
Some questions and a comments. I see the image posted is jpg small format. Is that the output from your scanner. If so you might want to change it to tiff. I downloaded your image and got considerable improvement after downsizing it to 7x10 and using the stabilize function in Topaz Sharpen AI. Photoshop has a stabilize filter under, I believe, Filters, Sharpen, Shake Reduction. In my opinion it is not as effective as Topaz but you might give it a try.


Actually, no. The original TIFF image that I got from the scanner was 93MB. I ran it through LR, it came out at 203 MB. I make small images to post online so that they don't take an hour to try to load only to get kicked back for size.

Reply
Oct 12, 2019 16:52:28   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
Thanks to the suggestion to rescan and do it over, I'm posting a new image. It turned out HUGE! LR didn't have a problem with it, but PS sure did. I used the scan settings I'm now using that give me a 600+ MB file. I processed it the same way in LR as the original, then took it to PS and tried the new settings in the layer. Here's the result (downsized!). It came out over 4G and PS wouldn't save it!

I'm not happy with it. It has lost a lot of the sparkle that I liked in the original. Since I don't know anything about "high pass" and the "soft" or "hard light" settings, I'm not sure if that made the difference or not. The two original scans look pretty much the same.

New scan, different setting in layer
New scan, different setting in layer...
(Download)

Reply
Oct 12, 2019 16:59:49   #
photophile Loc: Lakewood, Ohio, USA
 
AzPicLady wrote:
Thanks to the suggestion to rescan and do it over, I'm posting a new image. It turned out HUGE! LR didn't have a problem with it, but PS sure did. I used the scan settings I'm now using that give me a 600+ MB file. I processed it the same way in LR as the original, then took it to PS and tried the new settings in the layer. Here's the result (downsized!). It came out over 4G and PS wouldn't save it!

I'm not happy with it. It has lost a lot of the sparkle that I liked in the original. Since I don't know anything about "high pass" and the "soft" or "hard light" settings, I'm not sure if that made the difference or not. The two original scans look pretty much the same.
Thanks to the suggestion to rescan and do it over,... (show quote)


Lovely.

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2019 17:01:47   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
photophile wrote:
Lovely.


Thanks, Karin! I do appreciate your encouraging comment.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
For Your Consideration
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.