Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Experiencing problems with new scanner and software
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 1, 2019 09:38:04   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
jerryc41 wrote:
So VueScan and SilverFast both have learning curves. Not good! I'm waiting for a product that doesn't require learning. : )

I use the V600 software, and that satisfies my limited needs.


I know all about the learning curves. I got so spoiled with years of using the Nikon because I HAD learned how to use it and it worked! The first scanner I had didn't have any settings. It did negatives only, so one didn't even tell it what medium was inserted! Can't say it was wonderful, though!

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 09:39:24   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I agree with Cany with reference to ICE.
--Bob
Cany143 wrote:
What Bob said (re: SilverFast.) And what Steve said, too (re: ViewScan).

And as for using ICE, I don't. There may be those who disagree, but I find it softens the overall scan.

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 09:43:27   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
AzPicLady wrote:
When my Nikon 9000 died (the second time), I purchased the Epson V850. It's supposed to be the best. I'm really struggling to get decent scans from it, using the SilverFast software that came with it. ..

It sounds like you are having an issue using SilverFast. It's not as easy to learn as Nikon Scan and EPSON Scan.

Although you may ultimately end up using SiverFast, I suggest you start out using EPSON Scan. It is tailored to their specific product and recognizes all of the film holders. The user interface is more intuitive and you might be able to get it to do everything you need.

I have both the Coolscan 9000 (for 35mm and medium format) and the V750 which I use for medium and large format. The Coolscan 9000 is a little better and worth repairing if Nikon can still fix it. I was happy to pay them about $500 five years ago to replace the power supply.

Reply
 
 
Oct 1, 2019 09:44:01   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
rmalarz wrote:
I agree with Cany with reference to ICE.
--Bob



Reply
Oct 1, 2019 09:53:26   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
selmslie wrote:
It sounds like you are having an issue using SilverFast. It's not as easy to learn as Nikon Scan and EPSON Scan.

Although you may ultimately end up using SiverFast, I suggest you start out using EPSON Scan. It is tailored to their specific product and recognizes all of the film holders. The user interface is more intuitive and you might be able to get it to do everything you need.

I have both the Coolscan 9000 (for 35mm and medium format) and the V750 which I use for medium and large format. The Coolscan 9000 is a little better and worth repairing if Nikon can still fix it. I was happy to pay them about $500 five years ago to replace the power supply.
It sounds like you are having an issue using Silve... (show quote)


I started out using the Epson program. It did seem to be fairly easy to use. But I was getting over-contrasty results that weren't satisfactory and couldn't figure out any way to fix that. That's why I went to the SilverFast program.

My 9000 was fixed by Nikon some years back. The shipping was a huge factor, but they did fix it. It's now doing the same thing as before - the on-off button doesn't hold. But part of its problem is that I found a work-around for Win 7, but my computer guru keeps telling me that my Win 7 machine isn't going to last much longer. Do you have a work-around for Win10? I'm seriously thinking that even though I've sepnt thousands on the Epson, I should spend more and try to get the Nikon fixed again!

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 10:54:12   #
selmslie Loc: Fernandina Beach, FL, USA
 
AzPicLady wrote:
I started out using the Epson program. It did seem to be fairly easy to use. But I was getting over-contrasty results that weren't satisfactory and couldn't figure out any way to fix that. That's why I went to the SilverFast program.

My 9000 was fixed by Nikon some years back. The shipping was a huge factor, but they did fix it. It's now doing the same thing as before - the on-off button doesn't hold. But part of its problem is that I found a work-around for Win 7, but my computer guru keeps telling me that my Win 7 machine isn't going to last much longer. Do you have a work-around for Win10? I'm seriously thinking that even though I've sepnt thousands on the Epson, I should spend more and try to get the Nikon fixed again!
I started out using the Epson program. It did see... (show quote)

Contrast using the Epson is controlled in the Histogram Adjustment dialog and the pointers under the histogram display. The pointers under the histogram tell the scanner how much of the range to read (the two outer pointers) and how bright to make the mid-tones (the middle pointer). I always set the Output range to 0 and 255.

If Nikon will still service it the 9000 it may be worth it. Just remember to park the heads (press the Eject button for 5 seconds) before turning off the scanner. If the power supply fails there is no way to secure it for shipping it if you can't turn it on.

The workaround that we used to get it to work under Windows 7 after upgrading from XP was to install the Vista drivers. The same fix should work with Windows 10 but I don't look forward to testing it.

I installed Never 10 to prevent Microsoft from upgrading my operating system. They did it to me once without my consent and it was a disaster.


(Download)

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 11:11:08   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
selmslie wrote:
Contrast using the Epson is controlled in the Histogram Adjustment dialog and the pointers under the histogram display. The pointers under the histogram tell the scanner how much of the range to read (the two outer pointers) and how bright to make the mid-tones (the middle pointer). I always set the Output range to 0 and 255.

If Nikon will still service it the 9000 it may be worth it. Just remember to park the heads (press the Eject button for 5 seconds) before turning off the scanner. If the power supply fails there is no way to secure it for shipping it if you can't turn it on.

The workaround that we used to get it to work under Windows 7 after upgrading from XP was to install the Vista drivers. The same fix should work with Windows 10 but I don't look forward to testing it.

I installed Never 10 to prevent Microsoft from upgrading my operating system. They did it to me once without my consent and it was a disaster.
Contrast using the Epson is controlled in the Hist... (show quote)


I'll take another look at this. I did look at the histogram, but didn't move anything.

I think I'll contact Nikon again.

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2019 07:40:20   #
kubota king Loc: NW , Pa.
 
I checked out silverfast and see it is for stand alone scanners and only showed windows 7 or sooner . I didn't fine a copy that works with any scanner like Vuescan does or with windows 10 .

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 09:12:44   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
kubota king wrote:
I checked out silverfast and see it is for stand alone scanners and only showed windows 7 or sooner . I didn't fine a copy that works with any scanner like Vuescan does or with windows 10 .


In the fine print on the DVD, it only goes up to Win 7/8. But as soon as it's installed and the computer is online, it downloads a "newer version." And the V800/850 is actually listed in their list of scanners. So no problems there. I have 20-year-old programs that install and work just fine. So far I haven't discovered problems with the operating system.

Reply
Oct 4, 2019 14:09:05   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
I never use any dust or scratch removal with my scans on my Canoscan 8800F. I just set the scanner at 4800 dpi and output as tiff. I do all the dust and scratch and fiber removal in Photoshop using the healing brush tool which blends the surroundings into the area to make any dust or scratches disappear. I then can tweak the shadows/highlights brightness and contrast, hue and saturation, etc. Finally I reduce the image size to make it usable for posting online or sending by email. Basically I spend as much time on each scan as I would for any picture I consider a keeper.

Reply
Oct 4, 2019 15:00:09   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
Bobspez wrote:
I never use any dust or scratch removal with my scans on my Canoscan 8800F. I just set the scanner at 4800 dpi and output as tiff. I do all the dust and scratch and fiber removal in Photoshop using the healing brush tool which blends the surroundings into the area to make any dust or scratches disappear. I then can tweak the shadows/highlights brightness and contrast, hue and saturation, etc. Finally I reduce the image size to make it usable for posting online or sending by email. Basically I spend as much time on each scan as I would for any picture I consider a keeper.
I never use any dust or scratch removal with my sc... (show quote)


Thanks, Bob. I'm so spoiled by the Nikon's abilities, that other scanners really leave me cold. I never had to "fix" dust and scratches with the Nikon, because it did a beautiful job. I did finally get a few good scans the other day, but I spent HOURS fixing them. Not what I want, but I guess that's what I get.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.