RPaul3rd wrote:
I have a Canon 5d Mark III and a Canon SL2 CMOS, which is lighter and good for overseas travel, and, during a recent trip I shot til I dropped at Petra, Jordan. Wouldn't you know it, my wife took a panorama with her IPhone 8S and that is the one I've enlarged. Yes the IPhone is limited in what it can do but I have found the photos nice and sharp and editable with the in camera software. Not giving up my Canon gear but I also like the IPhone's results.
I like your observation, limited in what it can do. I find that to be the case and that, within its limits, it does a very good job for which it was designed.
Hi Chippy65!
I use my cell phone camera,which is a Galaxy S9+ for my online just for fun website where my potential
clients and customers,family,friends,can go to view some of my photos,but I do use skill when using my cellphone camera,so the quality of the photos are very good. But! when I'm shooting for clients are photography contest,I only use my DLSR camera equipment.So camera phones does play a major role in photography, but you can't be creative with cell phone technology, but they are a very useful tool.
Laroy Lindsey.
dayranch wrote:
Hi Chippy65!
I use my cell phone camera,which is a Galaxy S9+ for my online just for fun website where my potential
clients and customers,family,friends,can go to view some of my photos,but I do use skill when using my cellphone camera,so the quality of the photos are very good. But! when I'm shooting for clients are photography contest,I only use my DLSR camera equipment.So camera phones does play a major role in photography, but you can't be creative with cell phone technology, but they are a very useful tool.
Laroy Lindsey.
Hi Chippy65! br br I use my cell phone camera,whi... (
show quote)
You can be quite creative within their limits, just like any other camera. I have a D7200 and I canโt do slow motion video with it that I can do using my iPhone XR. Just select the option, point, and shoot. In fact, I do a lot of short video clips with my iPhone to add interest to my Pro Show presentstions.
MrBob
Loc: lookout Mtn. NE Alabama
BuckeyeBilly wrote:
Our 10-year-old Bose surround system with 5 tiny speakers just might change your assessment. It rivals anything you'll hear at the movie theater. In fact, we turned it up so loud one time that neighbors called the cops on us, but all we were doing was seeing its capabilities. We turned it back down and all was ok. But it did produce sound that was that sweet blend of loudness without distortion. Amazing!
I agree Buck.... That is why computational photography is the future. BTW, my little Bose radio/CD player rocks !
iPhones may rival image quality from cameras in some instances but cameras are more versatile and have a whole eco-system of lens and other gear to do the work. Besides, why would you trust your precious images to a device from a manufacturer (Apple) whose own authorized service network tells you that files can't be recovered from a damaged or faulty device and you have to give them your first-born male child to find out for sure. In my dslr, all I have to do is simply remove the card.
joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
chippy65 wrote:
enjoyed a series of camera phone pictures taken by my son during a recent holiday in the Mediterranean. I was impressed by the quality of the pictures
and on asking which camera he had used was surprised when he told me it was a budget priced cell phone that had cost less than one of my lenses !
Cant beat new technology ? Taking into consideration said cell phone is size limited, multi function, has a minuscule lens with a fixed focus and a tiny sensor,
how much of this performance is achieved with CPU and image processing and could this technology be advantageously applied to the expensive cumbersome
cameras we lug round with us? I am very fond of my cameras and lenses etc but I am feeling a little disillusioned and envious.
If it were not for the shortcomings of the lack of a viewfinder and the poor clarity of of the display screen in bright sunlight I could be tempted to leave my heavy stuff
at home when doing "Walk around photography"
seems to me that if traditional camera makers do not achieve better performance they will continue to see smaller sales
enjoyed a series of camera phone pictures taken by... (
show quote)
Your perception of a phone camera is way behind the current models.
BlackRipleyDog wrote:
iPhones may rival image quality from cameras in some instances but cameras are more versatile and have a whole eco-system of lens and other gear to do the work. Besides, why would you trust your precious images to a device from a manufacturer (Apple) whose own authorized service network tells you that files can't be recovered from a damaged or faulty device and you have to give them your first-born male child to find out for sure. In my dslr, all I have to do is simply remove the card.
Cellphones have their niche, like the Kodak Brownie or the Polaroid cameras in their day. They satisfy the needs of a large segment of purchasers. And as long as I keep my iPhone backed up to the iCloud, well you get the picture.
my perception of a cell phone is that they are a lot better than they might be expected to be ,bearing in mind the cramped dimensions, diminutive lens
with fixed focus and ultra short focal length, with the CPU optimized for functionalities not attempted by even the most advanced traditional cameras.
BUT..........certainly in my case I find the lack of a viewfinder a total turn-off, the unreadable image that fleetingly appears on the screen is so poor that
I have wondered if a wire frame indicator might be applicable. Am I alone in my inability to be able to see what I am attempting to record, particularly in
bright sunlight?. My eyesight is good, especially after the cataracts were corrected, and I requested my new lenses should continue my legacy of slight short sight.
I do definitely experience problems with glare, probably having got used, in cataract days, of a more veiled world. Point and pray is not the answer to my picture taking.
My experience of camera phones is confined to the older,more budget orientated models..........are the more expensive ones easier to use in bright light?
Cell phones, especially the most expensive ones appear to me to be very vulnerable to damage from dropping and in some locations to violent theft.
chippy65 wrote:
my perception of a cell phone is that they are a lot better than they might be expected to be ,bearing in mind the cramped dimensions, diminutive lens
with fixed focus and ultra short focal length, with the CPU optimized for functionalities not attempted by even the most advanced traditional cameras.
BUT..........certainly in my case I find the lack of a viewfinder a total turn-off, the unreadable image that fleetingly appears on the screen is so poor that
I have wondered if a wire frame indicator might be applicable. Am I alone in my inability to be able to see what I am attempting to record, particularly in
bright sunlight?. My eyesight is good, especially after the cataracts were corrected, and I requested my new lenses should continue my legacy of slight short sight.
I do definitely experience problems with glare, probably having got used, in cataract days, of a more veiled world. Point and pray is not the answer to my picture taking.
My experience of camera phones is confined to the older,more budget orientated models..........are the more expensive ones easier to use in bright light?
Cell phones, especially the most expensive ones appear to me to be very vulnerable to damage from dropping and in some locations to violent theft.
my perception of a cell phone is that they are a l... (
show quote)
I liken them to the modern day Polaroid camera - point, shoot, out pops the picture instantly. Grab your cellphone, point, shoot, and send your picture to hundreds of people instantly. Like the Polaroid of the days of yore, it has its pros and itโs cons. I don't think the developers ever saw it as a replacement for other types of cameras and I donโt think that many users see them that way either. Many users donโt even know what a DSLR is.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
rmalarz wrote:
Comparing cell phone photos to those taken with digital cameras is like comparing apples and oranges. It's very similar to comparing photos taken with a 35mm camera and those taken with a 4x5. Yeah, they are both cameras, but each delivers a completely different quality photograph.
--Bob
Really?
https://hashtagsandy.com/Sometimes the cellphone camera is the best solution - especially when you can charge it in your car, send images to agencies when the electrical power grid is down (but the cell network is up and running), and it is already in your pocket.
The images in the book that is in the link were taken by photographers that obviously know their craft, and did not for a second consider the limitations of the cellphone - and made the best of it. It's hard to argue with those kinds of results.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.