Off site cloud based photo storage
Sep 6, 2019 15:14:02 #
selmslie wrote:
Although not a backup service, Google+ was a cloud service for image sharing and it disappeared recently.
Any provider can fall victim to the vagaries of the economy.
Any provider can fall victim to the vagaries of the economy.
Yes but adaquate notice was given
Sep 6, 2019 17:00:37 #
Drbobcameraguy wrote:
Yes but adaquate notice was given
That's nice. But it's still gone.
If you have a lot of stuff backed up on the cloud, how much notice would be adequate?
Remember, everyone else would be downloading all of their files at the same time so it would probably take a lot longer to get them back than it did to upload them when under routine traffic conditions.
Sep 7, 2019 01:01:47 #
A. T. wrote:
Good morning my Hedge Hog family, I need you guys ... (show quote)
i have used Carbonite for years and when I have had a problem they have been spectacular.
Sep 8, 2019 02:21:24 #
foggypreacher
Loc: Dickinson, Texas
A. T. wrote:
No, I have not; however, as I mentioned, I really don't need anything other than my photos backed up. I really don't have anything else that's important enough to require off-site storage. I use time machine for everything else. Thanks for your reply and suggestions. I will take a look at Carbonite.
I also give Carbonite a thumbs up. I have used them for about 5 years on three machines. I have not gone to the upgrade for external hard drives, but may soon. Good luck.
Sep 8, 2019 21:13:53 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.