Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
WB Auto?
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
Aug 13, 2019 14:18:50   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
BigDaddy wrote:
Huh. Thats why I like .PSD, .ACDC and .AFPHOTO Files. Plus they save your edits.

I’m not familiar with those files, and will have to check them out. I use digital mostly for experimenting and am always willing to learn something new.

Reply
Aug 13, 2019 17:19:39   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
Bird Dawg wrote:
Y'all may think I'm crazy but I never shoot RAW. The question to the group is - Am I the only one who shoots JPEG all the time? ( with very little adjusting in LR )


I shoot jpeg all the time and have never shot raw. For my needs that is all I need. It works for me.

Dennis

Reply
Aug 13, 2019 17:34:06   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
dennis2146 wrote:
I shoot jpeg all the time and have never shot raw. For my needs that is all I need. It works for me.

Dennis


No problem. Shoot what works for you.

Reply
 
 
Aug 13, 2019 17:35:53   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
mwsilvers wrote:
No problem. Shoot what works for you.


That is exactly what I do. I have never felt the need to go along with what others are doing even if what they do works for them. My thinking is only to have it work for me.

Dennis

Reply
Aug 13, 2019 17:53:40   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
dennis2146 wrote:
That is exactly what I do. I have never felt the need to go along with what others are doing even if what they do works for them. My thinking is only to have it work for me.

Dennis

I shot only jpeg for the first 3 years after I got my first DSLR. I then shot jpeg + raw for a couple of years before I switched to 100% raw around 6 years ago. Everybody needs to find their own path to getting satisfactory results from their photography.

Reply
Aug 13, 2019 17:54:47   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
mwsilvers wrote:
I shot only jpeg for the first 3 years after I got my first DSLR. I then shot jpeg + raw for a couple of years before I switched to 100% raw around 6 years ago. Everybody needs to find their own path to getting satisfactory results from their photography.


True.

Dennis

Reply
Aug 14, 2019 00:23:35   #
Wallen Loc: Middle Earth
 
RAW vs JPEG is a very polarizing subject here in Hog. Many who advocate shooting RAW look down on those who shoot JPEG. Those who shoot only JPEG are mostly confused asking why RAW since JPEG fits their needs. Then there are those who know both sides of the coin and either tries to bridge the situation (sometimes getting called a liar & a fool) or just shut up and watch the show.

The reality is that there are different tools, needs, knowledge and skills. And since photography is to a certain degree a self expression, If you are happy with what you have, why ask for more?

No printer in the world can produce what the camera captures. However it goes, all files gets compressed to the same color-data capacity of modern JPEG files prior to printing.

A typical raw user flow:
(Camera settings-Capture)->RAW->(camera settings-Save)->RAW->(RAW converter-Lightroom etc. conversion/compression)->TIFF,JPEG, etc.(save & Share)->PRINT

A typical JPEG user flow:
(Camera settings-Capture)->RAW->(camera settings-Conversion/compression-Save)->JPEG/TIFF->SHARE/PRINT

or:
(Camera settings-Capture)->RAW->(camera settings-Conversion/compression-Save)->JPEG/TIFF->(Editor-Photoshop, Lightroom etc.)->TIFF,JPEG, etc.(save & Share)->PRINT

Whats the difference?
Raw files can not be printed or shared and expect to show good image. RAW users need to process RAW files manually before sharing or printing. If they rely on auto settings, They are no better than those who use the camera to convert the files.
They work on uncompressed files, more forgiving for mistakes & exposure error. Suited to tricky lighting conditions and fast computer.

JPEG users output JPEG SOOC final files. Must shoot accurately. Less forgiving of mistakes and if edited will work on less data/smaller files (depending on settings). Better flow for slower computers. Must use multiple exposures for tricky lighting conditions.

Reply
 
 
Aug 14, 2019 01:23:22   #
fstoprookie Loc: Central Valley of California
 
You know I started with a Nikon D50 way back when. I ONLY shot jpeg and thought I would never change to Raw file format. Why, I was happy with what I got shooting jpeg. Then one day I figured I'd shoot Raw just to see what the file format would let me do in APERTURE (an APPLE photo program) low and be hold, I could make adjustments in a nondestructive file and not loose any pixel count. That was a revelation to me. I was disappointed from that point on with the post processing in jpeg vs RAW. If you are wondering about the difference, try shooting in jpeg plus Raw. It'll take up a little more room, however you might see that you can do a lot more with a RAW file and not effect it's size (except for cropping)

Reply
Aug 14, 2019 11:35:09   #
BigDaddy Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
 
BigDaddy wrote:
Huh. Thats why I like .PSD, .ACDC and .AFPHOTO Files. Plus they save your edits.
RWR wrote:
I’m not familiar with those files, and will have to check them out. I use digital mostly for experimenting and am always willing to learn something new.

.PSD files are Photo Shop Development files. They are proprietary, lossless and preserve edits. You can always reopen a .PSD file and continue editing the file. You can also save the file anytime in any format you wish, usually jpg but all other common formats as well.

For example, if you have a Photo.jpg and edit it with PS, you can save it as a .psd file, which is lossless and saves your edits. You now have 2 files, Photo.jpg and Photo.psd. You could also save your edited file as a jpg, and would normally add to it's name to preserve the original jpg... Photo_1.jpg.

.acdc files and .afphoto files are exactly the same, except they are proprietary to ACDSee and AffinityPhoto editors. I used the term proprietary a bit loosely because both ACDSee and Affinity can use PSD files to some extent, and a lot of viewers can view .psd files.

Reply
Aug 14, 2019 14:43:50   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
BigDaddy wrote:
BigDaddy wrote:
Huh. Thats why I like .PSD, .ACDC and .AFPHOTO Files. Plus they save your edits.

.PSD files are Photo Shop Development files. They are proprietary, lossless and preserve edits. You can always reopen a .PSD file and continue editing the file. You can also save the file anytime in any format you wish, usually jpg but all other common formats as well.

For example, if you have a Photo.jpg and edit it with PS, you can save it as a .psd file, which is lossless and saves your edits. You now have 2 files, Photo.jpg and Photo.psd. You could also save your edited file as a jpg, and would normally add to it's name to preserve the original jpg... Photo_1.jpg.

.acdc files and .afphoto files are exactly the same, except they are proprietary to ACDSee and AffinityPhoto editors. I used the term proprietary a bit loosely because both ACDSee and Affinity can use PSD files to some extent, and a lot of viewers can view .psd files.
BigDaddy wrote: br Huh. Thats why I like .PSD, .AC... (show quote)

Looks like I have an excuse to shoot more digital! Thanks, appreciate it.

Reply
Aug 14, 2019 23:47:44   #
User ID
 
Grahame wrote:

The only comment I will make is that by
only shooting Jpeg you 'MAY POSSIBLY'
capture that fantastic, award winning and
saleable image that you 'MAY POSSIBLY'
later on wished you had the RAW file to
enable you to just squeeze that tiny bit
more out of


A tragedy of seismic scale !

Reply
 
 
Aug 14, 2019 23:58:13   #
Grahame Loc: Fiji
 
User ID wrote:
A tragedy of seismic scale !


May possibly be

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.