Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

Include dirt and mjmoore in there too. Mjmoore and dirt appear to be the same person. Both come on here to troll and bait, then turn people into admin.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

How about posting the T***H. All Rand did by v****g was make it go to the floor for discussion on how it would be funded for the next 80 years.

That, in a nutshell is the dishonesty of dimocraps. Lying about the facts of any matter are how dims operate.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

You disgust me daily but that seems to be the only joy you have so I let it slide.
Carry on Cruella

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

Awww, little Frankie, how nice that you caring lib f*****t socialist dems have names for those that tell you that you have your head where the sun doesn't shine. It is appreciated that you show your selves for what you truly are.

I'm pleased to do my part for your happiness.

EyeSawYou

Lol see you are lying 🤥 once again, he does not want or desire to withhold medical support for 911 First Responders. And you wonder why I call you a pathological liar. You demonstrate that every single day.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

Lies are all the lib f*****t socialist dems have.

Assume for a minute that he regurgitated what Mad Cow told him.......and he never bothered to verify because they automatically believe what they are told.

Or assume he is dishonest to the core, knew the t***h about the v**e and posted this anyway.

Either choice displays a high level of ignorance.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Fits right in with many replies from many Attic participants...

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

I love in when certain people whine about a possible lie while supporting one on the most documented liars in the world. Go figure.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

So, you are defending a post that was all a lie? How very fair of you.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

I didn't defend anything, but rather voiced my amusement at the discontent of those who perpetually whine about supposedly being lied to. kind of like the boy who cried wolf. Interpret it any way you wish.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

The fact of the matter is that Paul has a long history of opposing all bills that require new spending and do not have a pay for, including the tax cuts. This is all bulls**t hysteria by the left as the bill will pass next week with all the funding, of course the bill is somewhat reckless as it is for 72 years and has no spending caps or efficiency review system attached, typical DC bulls**t.

Paul will get his v**e on his amendment, the amendment will be v**ed down and then the bill will go to the floor where it will gain bipartisan support and be passed with a large majority, it has cost the beneficiaries of the fund nothing as the fund still has a couple of billion dollars in it.

Rand is only calling attention to the exorbitant deficits and Washington's refusal to deal with them in any manner.

Now I have a problem with democrats who know nothing running off at the mouth and that includes people like big fish and Frank and especially includes Aussies who don't know s**t about US politics but feel that they should have a say.

Includes the most recent statements from Jon Stewart also, he has been a real trooper in his efforts but he went off the rails the other day because he too don't know jack.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

Yet you can't answer the question.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

T***SLATED:

SteveR Loc: Michigan

Despite the delay, the bill will be passed in August. By not passing by unanimous consent, it merely delayed implementation by a short period of time. Rand brought up a good question. He knew it would not stop the passage of the bill. It had to do with how it would be passed but it allowed him to make a point about runaway spending of any kind. With the debt of this country, where would the money come from to pay for this? What cuts would offset these payments? What income would offset them? Or...do we just give Congress a blank check to spend money willy nilly? Point being made, the bill will pass. No first responders will fail to get the aid they need because it was delayed a month because there is still sufficient money in the fund.

BTW....Rand is but one voice in Congress. Alone he cannot do anything. His voice, however, like all others, can be heard. As this thread attests, it was.

Tex-s

It is a token gesture most likely intended to charm one constituent or another, not to affect actual policy at the moment. It's virtually the same move the so-called 'squad' of uber-l*****ts pulled in the House last week, v****g against the border detention facility funding (after raling and wailing about the conditions there, by the way). Mainstream media just does not manage to notice the BS when it's Democrats engaging in it.