Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Need some help
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jun 26, 2019 14:20:56   #
Selene03
 
gvarner wrote:
Check out a sling style camera strap. Adjusted properly it minimizes the weight on your neck. At least I think so.


I would agree with this. I like Op-tech straps and have found it much easier to carry cameras slung over the shoulder rather than around the neck. You can get one on Amazon for around $20.00. This will really help with weight.

Reply
Jun 26, 2019 16:34:00   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
Gdelvecc wrote:
Going to Israel for 8 days this November. I need to take a wide angle to medium telephoto zoom with me. I will be using a crop sensor D7200. Need something light since I'll be carrying it all day. The ones I have are too heavy to lug around all day. F4 or better. Thanks in advance for your ideas....


24-120 is all you need

Reply
Jun 26, 2019 17:13:34   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Gdelvecc wrote:
Going to Israel for 8 days this November. I need to take a wide angle to medium telephoto zoom with me. I will be using a crop sensor D7200. Need something light since I'll be carrying it all day. The ones I have are too heavy to lug around all day. F4 or better. Thanks in advance for your ideas....


Only take the Nikon 18-200.

Reply
 
 
Jun 26, 2019 17:54:07   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
The Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 is a great lens at a great price for APSc ! 24 is not wide enough IMO.
.

Reply
Jun 27, 2019 10:26:02   #
BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA
 
Chan Garrett wrote:
I can't really answer your question as you asked it. What I can do is suggest something else for your consideration. I made the same trip last November. I am so glad that I had that opportunity. Never been before, and because of age and other considerations will probably not get a second opportunity.
If I were one of the young guys (50-60years), I would have been happy carrying my Canon 7D Mark II, but due to my age (84) I was concerned about carrying the weight of that body plus two heavy lenses all day, every day. Remember, there is no level ground in Israel on which to walk very far.
Given the cost of the trip of a lifetime, I decided to spend a bit more for a camera that would meet my needs without breaking the bank. I purchased a Canon M50 (mirrorless) in a kit with a 15-45mm and a 55-200mm lenses. What a difference in weight. 95% of my images were captured wit the 15-45. I used a shoulder sling and was never bothered by the weight.
The resulting images captured were very acceptable. I have on enlarged to 16-20, framed an hanging on a wall in my home. I consider it to be among the very best images I have ever captured.
I can't really answer your question as you asked i... (show quote)


I am not the OP. I am taking what I stated. The same kit that I used in Japan last year. I do not need reommendations to purchase a new camera. I think you lost track of the conversation.

Reply
Jun 27, 2019 11:13:05   #
Chan Garrett
 
BobHartung wrote:
I am not the OP. I am taking what I stated. The same kit that I used in Japan last year. I do not need reommendations to purchase a new camera. I think you lost track of the conversation.


I do sincerely apologize if my reply offended you. As I stated at the start of my offending reply, "I can't answer your question as you asked it." I have no knowledge of the lenses you were inquiring about. I simply offered a description of how I solved the problem when I visited the same area, at the same time of year last year. I did state my experience with the lens I found to be most useful.
Once again, I apologize.

Reply
Jun 27, 2019 16:35:01   #
BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA
 
Chan Garrett wrote:
I do sincerely apologize if my reply offended you. As I stated at the start of my offending reply, "I can't answer your question as you asked it." I have no knowledge of the lenses you were inquiring about. I simply offered a description of how I solved the problem when I visited the same area, at the same time of year last year. I did state my experience with the lens I found to be most useful.
Once again, I apologize.


Again, I did not ask a question.

Reply
 
 
Jun 27, 2019 18:34:31   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
imagemeister wrote:
The Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 is a great lens at a great price for APSc ! 24 is not wide enough IMO.
.


Two mm difference between the Sigma 17-70 and the 18-200. Plus the 18-200 has a much greater telephoto advantage that the OP is looking for.
17-70 is 25mm to 105 on an APS
18-200 is 27mm to 300 mm on a APS

2 mm is not that great of difference, the OP is looking for telephoto reach. That is why I recommended it.

Reply
Jun 27, 2019 18:36:20   #
Chan Garrett
 
Oops, I think I may see the problem. My original "quote reply" quoted the wrong person. I was responding to the original post. My mistake. Rooky error.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.