imagemeister wrote:
Have you done a focus calibration?? Are you
hand holding?? Are you shooting wide open
aperture ?? Are you using double the focal
length for a shutter speed if hand holding ??
.
Agreed all those concerns are important with
this lens, except the shutter speed advice. Its
VR is extremely effective. The lens is capable
of excellent results if you avoid the extremes.
IOW, stop down when using the last 25% of
the marked zoom range, etc etc.
BTW, the lens only reaches 300mm at long
distances. At medium distances it's about
200mm. In portrait range it's under 150mm.
The 24-120 suffers waaaay less FL losses, so
for those whose usage seldom involves focus
near infinity, the 24-120 is the clear choice.
It's a very useful capable lens but is quirky.
Used carelessly, results will vary. And if you
avoid filters cuz they might rob you of a bit
of sharpness, the 28-300 is toxic to you. As
a user of both lenses, I'm not moved to let
go of the 28-300 for reason of results. If I'd
think of parting ways, it would be about its
size and weight.
.