LWW wrote:
Of course I’ve read it.
That you chose an ad hominem attack against me instead of answering a very simple question demonstrates that you have nothing ... and know it.
If you read it and still cannot see the plainly written facts, you have my sympathy. Your Baptist Wrasslin education was obviously for not.
McKinneyMike wrote:
If you read Volume 2 of the report, there is 11 different findings on obstruction. He said today that Congress should not allow Trump's obstructing and lies to stand. Have you read any of the damned report? I gather not, but your mouth sure runs like you are a genius. More like a hair brained dolt or worse. If you spent half the time that you post your BS, read the report, then honestly report the findings, you would be doing the remainder of the knuckled**ggers, a service. Maybe they might finally realize what has been obvious to most Americans for far too long and it is time to put the cleansing light of facts (not fantasy spin)on this criminal in the WH's reign of division and tyranny.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955290-Mueller-Report-Volume-II-Obstruction.htmlIf you read Volume 2 of the report, there is 11 di... (
show quote)
LOL as if YOU read the Mueller report LOLOL.
McKinneyMike wrote:
April 18th 2019: William Barr publicly states that Robert Mueller did not use the DOJ Guidelines with regards to his not being able to indict a sitting president as the reason he did not indict or influence their findings. Fast forward to this morning. Mueller clearly states that he did not come to a conclusion of obstruction, because of the DOJ guidelines, not because of his findings! Bill Barr is a certifiable LIAR! Look it up. Barr is trying to provide cover for Trump, PERIOD!
LOL give it up snowflake, no collusion so therefore NO obstruction, what would there be to obstruct when there was no prior crime to obstruct an investigation to a no crime?
McKinneyMike wrote:
April 18th 2019: William Barr publicly states that Robert Mueller did not use the DOJ Guidelines with regards to his not being able to indict a sitting president as the reason he did not indict or influence their findings. Fast forward to this morning. Mueller clearly states that he did not come to a conclusion of obstruction, because of the DOJ guidelines, not because of his findings! Bill Barr is a certifiable LIAR! Look it up. Barr is trying to provide cover for Trump, PERIOD!
He found nothing... closed the case today. Did you hear/see him do that?
Just remember that us tin foil hat wearing deplorables were right for the last two years and you continue to be wrong.
So is your new blood lust trump lust now?
All I see in the media is desperation to find or create something.
McKinneyMike wrote:
Did any of you Trump ass kissers listen? Hahaha!
Nuttin that’s already been said.
*yawn
McKinneyMike wrote:
If you read it and still cannot see the plainly written facts, you have my sympathy. Your Baptist Wrasslin education was obviously for not.
I read the whole report, I could not find a statement specifically saying "Trump committed the crime of ___" anywhere in it, feel free to post it if I missed that or any similar statement. While it is true Mueller said they couldn't charge him with anything, there is absolutely no policy, rule, regulation, or law which prevented him from specifically stating that he found Trump committed a crime which he could name. Therefore, it's logical to conclude he didn't find anything in criminal in Trump's actions.
Russia is considered to be an enemy of our country. Why did evil dictator Vladimir Putin so desperately want Trump to be our president?
gorgehiker wrote:
Russia is considered to be an enemy of our country. Why did evil dictator Vladimir Putin so desperately want Trump to be our president?
He’d have wanted Hildabeast. Ruskies paid them millions.
McKinneyMike wrote:
Did any of you Trump ass kissers listen? Hahaha!
You realize you look as looney as anyone when you post like that? Lol
I didn’t hear anything new. What was new?
gorgehiker wrote:
Russia is considered to be an enemy of our country. Why did evil dictator Vladimir Putin so desperately want Trump to be our president?
Gosh where did you get that insider information?
yhtomit wrote:
Dear jackboot licker,
The mueller just hung himself for dereliction of duty.
It was his job to make a finding. He did not. Barr can prosecute the mueller now.
He's going back to his private life in the swamp...
Be sure to quote your handlers accurately.
Sorry, no cigar. And I believe that the entire "Mueller Investigation" was a sham from the outset. There was no predicated crime for investigation. It was a farce.
However, Mueller's charge was to investigate and report to the AG. That's what he did. As a prosecutor, he can prosecute those who are not the President. He did prosecute some crimes. However, they weren't predicated on his original charge by Assistant AG Rosenstein. What would AG Barr prosecute, bad writing?
Mueller erred grievously by inserting innocence in his report. As a criminal matter, there is only guilt or no guilt; innocence is assumed. His report is merely a political guide for impeachment by the House.
gorgehiker wrote:
Russia is considered to be an enemy of our country. Why did evil dictator Vladimir Putin so desperately want Trump to be our president?
Re position your tin foil hat. Russia was both Pro Hillary and Pro Trump in their attempts. The spent only 300 K on this, which is nothing. Dems want you to think this is a big deal and you are a good little follower who does what Mad Cow dictates.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
McKinneyMike wrote:
If you read it and still cannot see the plainly written facts, you have my sympathy. Your Baptist Wrasslin education was obviously for not.
Again with ad hominem attacks rather than face the t***hs ... topped off with verifying your own lack of education while doing so.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.