Pelosi prays for Trump (Page 12): You make claims without backing up what you claim.

BigBear Loc: Northern CT

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

You fail to recognize the following from Article II, the last paragraph of Section 1:

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Your idol is not upholding his Oath of Office!

You make claims without backing up what you claim.

BigBear Loc: Northern CT

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

No matter how often you repeat a lie, it's still a lie!

Mueller did NOT exonerate trump in his report!

Because that is not his job !!!

Angmo

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

No matter how often you repeat a lie, it's still a lie!

Mueller did NOT exonerate trump in his report!

Recall if you can, Kent Star pointed out 11 crimes committed so kkklinton was impeached. No special council Exonerates. That’s a leftie cry of pain.

Muller got nothing:

Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

The bigger question is did Barr shut down the Mueller Investigation prematurely as soon as he was sworn in?

Ya know, you've been making dozens of ridiculous claims without one shred of evidence. I just let it go because I thought your ideas were just too ludicrous to take seriously. But let me ask you this:

If William Barr distorted the Mueller Report so badly as you claim, then why the Hell didn't Robert Mueller come out screaming about it on the 6:00 News??? Surely every single news organization would have given their soul to have him on. Why hasn't a single news organization sought out Mueller to ask him his opinion about the report??? I know that none of them has because if they did, it would have been loudly reported that "Mueller could not be reached for comment." or "Mueller refused our phone calls." But NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH! On top of that, why didn't the House of Representatives, which is controlled by the Democrats, immediately subpoena Mueller to get the "real" story??? And why do the Democrats in Congress refuse to even read the Muelller report?????????????

I can tell you the obvious answer to all these questions. Everybody knows, INCLUDING THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS, that Mueller came up with nothing against Trump, other than some vague suggestion that the DOJ should look into Obstruction of Justice. If Congress or any left-wing news organization were to question Mueller, they fully know that the interview would end up being a gigantic dud because Mueller would refute everything in the Democrat narrative. Instead it is in their interest to "keep the mystery alive" by just making vague and unsubstantiated charges (similar to what you are doing) without making a single reference to any actual interviews or facts collected by the Mueller Team. This is so bloody obvious that anyone with two brain cells can see it.

It is not clear how long this strategy can be employed. It relies solely on the self-deception and/or ignorance of Democrat v**ers, and how long they can be strung along. It is only a matter of time, however, before the "real" Russian Collusion story filters its way to these self-deceptive and/or ignorant Democrat v**ers, many of whom will stick to their fantasy ideas, but many others will see the corruption of the Obama Administration for what it was, especially when the indictments are handed down.

Even You will eventually learn the t***h, whether you decide to accept it or not.

mwalsh Loc: Houston

Steven Seward wrote:

Ya know, you've been making dozens of ridiculous claims without one shred of evidence. I just let it go because I thought your ideas were just too ludicrous to take seriously. But let me ask you this:

If William Barr distorted the Mueller Report so badly as you claim, then why the Hell didn't Robert Mueller come out screaming about it on the 6:00 News??? Surely every single news organization would have given their soul to have him on. Why hasn't a single news organization sought out Mueller to ask him his opinion about the report??? I know that none of them has because if they did, it would have been loudly reported that "Mueller could not be reached for comment." or "Mueller refused our phone calls." But NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH! On top of that, why didn't the House of Representatives, which is controlled by the Democrats, immediately subpoena Mueller to get the "real" story??? And why do the Democrats in Congress refuse to even read the Muelller report?????????????

I can tell you the obvious answer to all these questions. Everybody knows, INCLUDING THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS, that Mueller came up with nothing against Trump, other than some vague suggestion that the DOJ should look into Obstruction of Justice. If Congress or any left-wing news organization were to question Mueller, they fully know that the interview would end up being a gigantic dud because Mueller would refute everything in the Democrat narrative. Instead it is in their interest to "keep the mystery alive" by just making vague and unsubstantiated charges (similar to what you are doing) without making a single reference to any actual interviews or facts collected by the Mueller Team. This is so bloody obvious that anyone with two brain cells can see it.

It is not clear how long this strategy can be employed. It relies solely on the self-deception and/or ignorance of Democrat v**ers, and how long they can be strung along. It is only a matter of time, however, before the "real" Russian Collusion story filters its way to these self-deceptive and/or ignorant Democrat v**ers, many of whom will stick to their fantasy ideas, but many others will see the corruption of the Obama Administration for what it was, especially when the indictments are handed down.

Even You will eventually learn the t***h, whether you decide to accept it or not.

Ya know, you've been making dozens of ridiculous c... (show quote)

Good points.

Its possible Mueller can't talk about it at all. But I also have not heard any press even attempting to get comment from him. That does say something...and its likely not what the left wants to hear.

Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio

mwalsh wrote:

Its possible Mueller can't talk about it at all.

I'm no lawyer, but so far I have not heard a single pundit give a reason why Mueller would not be able to talk.

BigBear Loc: Northern CT

Steven Seward wrote:

I'm no lawyer, but so far I have not heard a single pundit give a reason why Mueller would not be able to talk.

Either he would be called a lying r****t and be disowned, or he would disappear in the Deep Throat Swamp never to be heard from again ... until the next investigation is called for.

Angmo

Steven Seward wrote:

I'm no lawyer, but so far I have not heard a single pundit give a reason why Mueller would not be able to talk.

He already has. 400 pages of nothing. He merely proved the left lies about everything.

And the left wants more? Insane.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

BigBear wrote:

You make claims without backing up what you claim.

Wow, yet another moment of denial.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Steven Seward wrote:

Ya know, you've been making dozens of ridiculous claims without one shred of evidence. I just let it go because I thought your ideas were just too ludicrous to take seriously. But let me ask you this:

If William Barr distorted the Mueller Report so badly as you claim, then why the Hell didn't Robert Mueller come out screaming about it on the 6:00 News??? Surely every single news organization would have given their soul to have him on. Why hasn't a single news organization sought out Mueller to ask him his opinion about the report??? I know that none of them has because if they did, it would have been loudly reported that "Mueller could not be reached for comment." or "Mueller refused our phone calls." But NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH! On top of that, why didn't the House of Representatives, which is controlled by the Democrats, immediately subpoena Mueller to get the "real" story??? And why do the Democrats in Congress refuse to even read the Muelller report?????????????

I can tell you the obvious answer to all these questions. Everybody knows, INCLUDING THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS, that Mueller came up with nothing against Trump, other than some vague suggestion that the DOJ should look into Obstruction of Justice. If Congress or any left-wing news organization were to question Mueller, they fully know that the interview would end up being a gigantic dud because Mueller would refute everything in the Democrat narrative. Instead it is in their interest to "keep the mystery alive" by just making vague and unsubstantiated charges (similar to what you are doing) without making a single reference to any actual interviews or facts collected by the Mueller Team. This is so bloody obvious that anyone with two brain cells can see it.

It is not clear how long this strategy can be employed. It relies solely on the self-deception and/or ignorance of Democrat v**ers, and how long they can be strung along. It is only a matter of time, however, before the "real" Russian Collusion story filters its way to these self-deceptive and/or ignorant Democrat v**ers, many of whom will stick to their fantasy ideas, but many others will see the corruption of the Obama Administration for what it was, especially when the indictments are handed down.

Even You will eventually learn the t***h, whether you decide to accept it or not.

Ya know, you've been making dozens of ridiculous c... (show quote)

Yes, we all will learn, but not from the interpretation of a single source.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

BigBear wrote:

Either he would be called a lying r****t and be disowned, or he would disappear in the Deep Throat Swamp never to be heard from again ... until the next investigation is called for.

You and a couple of your cohorts are definitely examples of deep throats.

Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio

DaveO wrote:

Yes, we all will learn, but not from the interpretation of a single source.

The report has been in the public domain for over a month. Which of the tens of thousands of people who have read the report is considered the single interpretive source?

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Steven Seward wrote:

The report has been in the public domain for over a month. Which of the tens of thousands of people who have read the report is considered the single interpretive source?

The one who was privy to the unredacted version.

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

DaveO wrote:

The one who was privy to the unredacted version.

This week, the revised version of the Mueller Report is due out.

You know which one, the one where all of the Flynn redacted information SHALL be revealed!

Let's see what those revelations have to offer for your "arguments"!

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

This week, the revised version of the Mueller Report is due out.

You know which one, the one where all of the Flynn redacted information SHALL be revealed!

Let's see what those revelations have to offer for your "arguments"!

Essentially I have no argument other than I am in favor of a more representative interpretation than that of just one man and that they should all have the same access. Keying on the Russian aspect is less important than the obstruction issues.