How could I have made this less grainy?
Aug 23, 2012 14:30:17 #
If you can't use flash or you are too far away to use flash then you have two options. (maybe more)
1. Buy a faster lens. f2.8 would be two stops faster and would put the iso at 500 or so.
2. Shoot as you did and post process with a good noise reduction software.
1. Buy a faster lens. f2.8 would be two stops faster and would put the iso at 500 or so.
2. Shoot as you did and post process with a good noise reduction software.
Aug 23, 2012 21:00:56 #
Harvey wrote:
Looks like we all had the same idea - a quick run thru PP in CS4 -brightness/contrast saves lots of photos one would have lost in film.-I love digital editing programs.
Harvey
Harvey
Nice redo, Harvey!
:thumbup:
Aug 23, 2012 23:08:24 #
You can shoot at 3200 or 6400 ISO with the 7D. ( I have, many times, and with satisfying results).
Problem is when you have slow lenses ( which quality is not the best ) you end up with blurry images with low contrast.
A nice 70-210 F2.8 would have taken care of your situation I believe. Problem is, it costs over $2,000.
Problem is when you have slow lenses ( which quality is not the best ) you end up with blurry images with low contrast.
A nice 70-210 F2.8 would have taken care of your situation I believe. Problem is, it costs over $2,000.
Aug 23, 2012 23:20:02 #
We all use different photo imaging enhancement programs and we all have our favorites. I have several and used Aperture 3.2.4 I quickly tweaked it several different ways and came up with this on your thumbnail. I agree with someone else about using at least a f2.8 lens and probably a telephoto at least 70-200 mm would reach out and grab what you wanted in this case.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.