Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Portrait lens for Nikon
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
May 21, 2019 08:51:20   #
yorkiebyte Loc: Scottsdale, AZ/Bandon by the Sea, OR
 
~Most (all?) of us know the field of angle of a given lens does not change from DX to FX/FF, right?
A 50 - 55 mm lens may be okay for candid portraiture, but 85 and longer will produce a more classic portraiture field.
~ Hence the use of the 70-200 F2.8 range zoom for portraiture.
BUT, I know everybody here already knows this, so I'll be quiet......

Reply
May 21, 2019 08:53:47   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
Lingoswag wrote:
Can a Nikon - AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED Macro Lens be used for portraits?


Yes
And as you have thought correctly does double duty as a portrait and macro and just excellent general purpose lens.
If starting out this is a great start.
If portraits become a big part of your photography then later look at a faster 85mm lens.

Reply
May 21, 2019 09:01:33   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
It’s a great portrait lens.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2019 09:06:17   #
GrandmaG Loc: Flat Rock, MI
 
hammond wrote:
I wanted to get a lens exclusively for shooting portraits - have the Nikon D500.
Compared a ton of lenses in the 50-85mm range, wanted a shallow depth of field/wide aperture/nice bokeh.
Narrowed it down to the following best options based on the pictures I saw taken by people who own these lenses:

- Voightlander 58mm f1.4 - very nice lense for the money: but not auto-focus.

- Zeiss Otus 55mm f1.4 - super nice pictures, but at $3,990 new, it's waaay out of my price range (and no AF)

- Sigma 50mm f1.4 Art Lens - very sharp lens, but really big and heavy, and so many of the images I saw just lacked character (a bit 'sterile'). Found many used copies selling for $500 or less, which tells me that people who bought the lens weren't particularly happy with it in the long run.

- Nikon 58mm f1.4G - this lens has a really wide range of reviews: from people complaining about Chromatic Aberration and 'over-priced' to others gushing over it's 'smooth bokeh' and 'unique character'.

+++

So I kind of narrowed it down to the Sigma 50mm and the Nikon 58mm. Read just about every review and watched every video I could find. I noticed that over time, even the critics who hated on the Nikon 58mm at the beginning warmed up to it over time, with many ultimately falling in love with the lens. Many of the reviewers called it 'special' and that it had an indefinable 'character'... and many of the pictures I saw taken with this lens took my breath away.
The Sigma just didn't instill that kind of bond in any of the reviews I read.

I went ahead and found a great deal on a used version of the Nikon 58mm at KEH for only slightly more than the Sigma 50mm costs new - it came with a 6 month warranty, and was pretty much like-new when I opened the box.

Suffice to say, I'm very happy with the results - took this shot of my buddy the night I picked it up (low light, in the streets of Hong Kong).
I wanted to get a lens exclusively for shooting po... (show quote)


I think you made a GREAT choice. I sold my “perfect for portraits” 85 lens because I just didn’t have the room in my home studio to back up far enough. I’ve been using a Sigma 50-100/1.8 lens but it is too big and heavy for portraits outside. I’m going to look into the Nikon 58/1.4 now that you’ve shared the results of your searches. Thank you!!

BTW, if I buy the 58/1.4, I’ll probably sell the 50-100.

Reply
May 21, 2019 10:05:14   #
trinhqthuan Loc: gaithersburg
 
Lingoswag wrote:
Can a Nikon - AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED Macro Lens be used for portraits?


my AF D 105 mm f/2.8 Micro is great for portrait , I prefer it over the Af D 85 mm f/1.8 ( a portrait lens)

Reply
May 21, 2019 10:48:46   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
trinhqthuan wrote:
my AF D 105 mm f/2.8 Micro is great for portrait , I prefer it over the Af D 85 mm f/1.8 ( a portrait lens)


Are you talking about a full frame or crop sensor? I like my 85 for portraits on a crop sensor camera. A 105 on a full frame is a classic portrait lens.

Reply
May 21, 2019 10:59:22   #
trinhqthuan Loc: gaithersburg
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
Are you talking about a full frame or crop sensor? I like my 85 for portraits on a crop sensor camera. A 105 on a full frame is a classic portrait lens.


With my D7100, just step a little further with 105 mm, or closer 85 mm. More lately I prefer my micro 105 mm ( can do macro on road ). The Nikkor Af D 85mm f/1.8 is much lighter.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2019 13:12:08   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
I have two favorite lenses for portraits/headshots. These are the Nikon 85/1.4G and the Nikon 105/1.4G. I lean towards the 105 for full frame and to the 85 for crop frame. Just my $ .02. Best of luck.

Reply
May 21, 2019 16:23:41   #
jpgto Loc: North East Tennessee
 

Reply
May 21, 2019 16:48:58   #
smlek Loc: Chicago, IL
 
My vote is 105mm for FX, especially the 105 F/2.8 AF Macro, excellent double duty lens. Some of my favorite portraits came out of a 105mm F/4 AIS that was older than me.

Reply
May 21, 2019 18:37:18   #
fetzler Loc: North West PA
 
A lens not mentioned here would be the 60mm micro-Nikkor. This 90mm equivalent on DX camera.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2019 18:47:11   #
Haydon
 
Part of a good portrait is staying connected with your subject verbally. Longer lenses can offer a more appealing compression but at the expense of distancing yourself from your subject. On a crop body I wouldn't push much past 100 mm. An 85 mm seems to work exceptionally well on a full frame.

Reply
May 21, 2019 22:29:34   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
I have both the 85mm f1.8 and the 105 f2.8 macro and plan to keep both. The 105 is a D lens - no focus motor - but still substantial compared to the 85. Personally I'd never use a 50mm for a head shot unless I was specifically looking for the sort of wide angle look - especially the nose. Again, just personal taste.

Reply
May 21, 2019 23:19:56   #
ronpier Loc: Poland Ohio
 
Lingoswag wrote:
Thanks rjaywallace. Would you recommend another lens that may be better and what would make it a better choice with a dx camera? I have a Nikon D5300 w/ kit lens.


Check out the new Tamron 35-150 f2.8-4 due out on 5/24. Specifically designed for portraits and other uses too. FX but 52-225 on DX.

Reply
May 21, 2019 23:30:33   #
yorkiebyte Loc: Scottsdale, AZ/Bandon by the Sea, OR
 
DaveyDitzer wrote:
I have both the 85mm f1.8 and the 105 f2.8 macro and plan to keep both. The 105 is a D lens - no focus motor - but still substantial compared to the 85. Personally I'd never use a 50mm for a head shot unless I was specifically looking for the sort of wide angle look - especially the nose. Again, just personal taste.


Yes! Totally agree with this observation. The 50 mm range is too short for portraiture... other than used for an "artistic" look, it will distort.
Try it and see compared to something longer!
- I use my 50mm 1.4 and 1.8 lenses quite a bit... But I whip out the 85mm 1.8 or use my 55-200vr at 100mm or higher for a great portrait look.
..... I shoot DX on a D7000 or D7100 Nikon. My 4/3 OM-10.1 has never been used for portraiture as my longest Len's is a Sigma 60mm 2.8 Art.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.