Nikon/Sony/Canon Etc (Page 2): :sm24: I started with a Canon EX-Auto, then an Ftb, then an AE-1. I was very pleased with them, so I stayed with Canon. But I did have a Sony Mavica...

Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States

Architect1776 wrote:

Bottom line we like the chosen brand for mostly pe... (show quote)

I started with a Canon EX-Auto, then an Ftb, then an AE-1. I was very pleased with them, so I stayed with Canon.
But I did have a Sony Mavica (flopy disk) before the Sony H1 (which I still use) before I purchased the T1i.

zug55 Loc: Naivasha, Kenya, and Austin, Texas

rmorrison1116 wrote:

If you are looking to buy a new DSLR and you don't already have lenses, I'd go with the one you can get the best price on. Either way, Canon or Nikon, you can't go wrong. If you are looking at mirrorless MILC'S, wait until the next round of models are released.

Two comments: (1) If you do not have any lenses already I would not buy a DSLR anymore. It is old technology that will fade away like film did. (2) You don't have to wait until the next Canon or Nikon mirrorless generation. You just could buy a Sony now--they are in the third generation now, and all the early problems have been worked out.

AndyH Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire

All of the major brands are very similar in capability and IQ. Differences are mainly in ergonomics and vestigial brand loyalty.

I’ve always been a Nikon guy, and I honestly prefer their digital ergonomics. I have soft spots for Pentax and Olympus dating from film days, and utmost respect for Canon. Try as many makes as possible, and make your choice on feel and budget. You can’t really go too far wrong.

Andy

traderjohn Loc: New York City

Min Ron wrote:

I've read a lot about Canon's throughout the feeds. Is there a distinct difference between the Nikon? Would one be greater than the other; DSLR, or is it all in the lenses in front of the shooter?

What do like a Chevy or a Ford?? Both get you where you are going. Your choice.

Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States

AndyH wrote:

All of the major brands are very similar in capability and IQ. Differences are mainly in ergonomics and vestigial brand loyalty.

I’ve always been a Nikon guy, and I honestly prefer their digital ergonomics. I have soft spots for Pentax and Olympus dating from film days, and utmost respect for Canon. Try as many makes as possible, and make your choice on feel and budget. You can’t really go too far wrong.

Andy

Digital ergonomics???
The way your fingers (digits) work on the camera or
the ergonomics of their digital cameras?

Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States

traderjohn wrote:

What do like a Chevy or a Ford?? Both get you where you are going. Your choice.

Notorious T.O.D. Loc: Harrisburg, North Carolina

Canon vs Nikon is sort of Chevy vs Ford. I looked hard at each and chose Canon. I liked the Canon selection of lenses and the common mount of FF lenses. The Nikon lens naming and various capabilities I still find confusing. Nikon lenses seem to be more expensive than similar Canon lenses too.

The Canon controls and menus seemed a little more straightforward to my mind. I am happy with my choice. But most any camera can capture a decent image today. There are many good choices and options. Yet every camera remains a compromise.

Jimmy T Loc: Virginia

Min Ron wrote:

I've read a lot about Canon's throughout the feeds. Is there a distinct difference between the Nikon? Would one be greater than the other; DSLR, or is it all in the lenses in front of the shooter?

I have Canon DSLRs and a Canon RP.
I have some $ invested in Canon glass, so making a change at this point in my life would be very painful.
In my opinion, none of the "Big Three" FF Digital camera makers have a clear practical advantage over the other two.
I also love the Canon menu system and find the Sony menus a complete puzzle.
Years ago I had a Nikon film SLR and loved it.
Also, I still admire Nikon, Sony, and a few others.
Smile,
JimmyT Sends

camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.

There are differences in the sense that some cameras have more technology than others. Ergonomically speaking there are also differences. The glass makes a tremendous difference.

CWGordon

As many above have written the differences are not significant. Nitpicking when deciding which is best. My Dad always said “That’s why they make Chevys and Fords, red ones and blue ones.” This carries over to BMW and Audi and many other makes of products. He could have said “...Nikons and Canons” and been right on. I think they each have some great lenses and some not quite as good as the other. Next year or sooner, which ever camera is thought the best might be replaced by the other only to recapture the title with the next model. I went Nikon this time after being a Canon guy back in Prehistoric film days. I have not been sorry; Canon changes lens mounts more often. That can be annoying. I enjoy and am more comfortable with the user-friendliness I find with all of my Nikons. Others may feel the same with their Canons. You say potato I say potato, or you know what I am trying to say.
I grew up a Mercury and Ford guy. David Pearson and Fred Lorenzen were the drivers I liked back then.
I still have those preferences. My last 2 American built cars were an almost original Mustang 289 and a Mercury Cyclone 351 Cleveland. I generally now prefer German and English automobiles to Japanese. I think once again, personal preference on ride, handling make the choice/decision for us.
Take lots of pictures and either will do you right. Have fun.

CWGordon

As many above have written the differences are not significant. Nitpicking when deciding which is best. My Dad always said “That’s why they make Chevys and Fords, red ones and blue ones.” This carries over to BMW and Audi and many other makes of products. He could have said “...Nikons and Canons” and been right on. I think they each have some great lenses and some not quite as good as the other. Next year or sooner, which ever camera is thought the best might be replaced by the other only to recapture the title with the next model. I went Nikon this time after being a Canon guy back in Prehistoric film days. I have not been sorry; Canon changes lens mounts more often. That can be annoying. I enjoy and am more comfortable with the user-friendliness I find with all of my Nikons. Others may feel the same with their Canons. You say potato I say potato, or you know what I am trying to say.
I grew up a Mercury and Ford guy. David Pearson and Fred Lorenzen were the drivers I liked back then.
I still have those preferences. My last 2 American built cars were an almost original Mustang 289 and a Mercury Cyclone 351 Cleveland. I generally now prefer German and English automobiles to Japanese. I think once again, personal preference on ride, handling make the choice/decision for us.
Take lots of pictures and either will do you right. Have fun.

rodpark2 Loc: Dallas, Tx

Brands matter little. Models within the brands matter a lot. Mirrorless vs DSLR is a personal choice and somewhat dependent on subject matter.

wapiti Loc: round rock, texas

Min Ron wrote:

Thank you. I'm a Nikon man as well as a Chevy man. Some how they both fit mainly from one place to the next to do a shoot.

drumme

Longshadow wrote:

It doesn’t make much difference. Do some research, talk to friends, visit camerastores if there are any near where you live. When you find one that you feel comfortable with, go for it. The n learn how to use it and practice, practice, practice. You’ll be satisfied if you stick with it.

Jerrin1 Loc: Wolverhampton, England

Min Ron wrote:

I've read a lot about Canon's throughout the feeds. Is there a distinct difference between the Nikon? Would one be greater than the other; DSLR, or is it all in the lenses in front of the shooter?

I've owned 8 x Canon SLR's/DSLRs over the years; my last two were a 7D mark II and a 70D. I has always wondered why on earth someone would choose to own a Nikon camera when Canon made the best cameras available. I then bought a Nikon D500. Wow! I shoot wildlife almost exclusively, and the D500 blew my Canon cameras out of the water for AF and dynamic range. I now own a Sony A9 and a Sony A7III and doubt I will ever return to either Canon or Nikon. If I had to choose two (I always take two cameras out with me) DSLR's, though, I would take a Nikon D500 and a Nikon D850 over anything else on the market. In my experience, Canon sensors are no match for Nikon (Sony). As I shoot mirrorless now, it's Sony all the way for me.