Current Trump Trade Tariffs (Page 14): He did not list 10 things that he felt should be investigated, that is your lie, he listed 10 things that he investigated that he could not come...

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

mjmoore17 wrote:

Again, lies come so naturally to you. According to Mueller they did not come up empty. He listed at least ten things that he felt should be investigated. You already know this and persist in lying. Just to save time, what are you going to lie about tomorrow so we do not have to wait.

He did not list 10 things that he felt should be investigated, that is your lie, he listed 10 things that he investigated that he could not come to a conclusion on. How silly is it for demonics to continue to demand an investigation into obstruction for the investigation of a crime that never happened in the first place.... It is truly a shame that you maricos did not approach the Clinton investigation with the same vigor.

No conclusion means no charges, get over it. Barr thoroughly explained why those charges will not be filed.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

WNYShooter wrote:

And where do you think you'll get that t***h, from the politicians? From the News? Me personally, I have a hard time believing either, so then I have to look at how the matter affects my life, and the lives of my family. That report affects us SQUAT no matter it's interpretation.

We let the professional investigators investigate, and they rendered their decisions. We should accept them and move on. If other evidence arises, we can always revisit with a new group of investigators.

The fact that you choose to believe Barr's interpretation is fine for you. While you feel that the validity of the four page summary does not really affect our lives, I feel differently because it affects my well being, the wellness of my family and the stability of our country, which is dependent upon the person in the oval office. The decisions of the so called professional investigators was not given to us and we know not what the evidence actually is.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

KenW wrote:

The decline of American made goods began in this c... (show quote)

Read a book.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Blurryeyed wrote:

He did not list 10 things that he felt should be i... (show quote)

The Clinton card rides again!

I suppose the B******i investigations could be revisited.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

DaveO wrote:

Your premise is that the report contained nothing. Mine is that Americans deserve to know the t***h without claims of political interpretation.

The report was lightly redacted, only Grand Jury testimony and ongoing investigative issues were redacted.... What do you think that Barr is hiding? Trump gave everything to Mueller that he asked for without exercising executive privilege, he allowed the White House attorney to freely be questioned by Mueller, the only thing that he did not do was a face to face interview because his attorneys knew that it would be a perjury trap.

This is over, and no, there is no two ton elephant hidden under those redactions.

Besides, the current laws governing the report, that did not have to be shared, do not allow for its release either to congress or to the public.

WNYShooter Loc: WNY

DaveO wrote:

The fact that you choose to believe Barr's interpretation is fine for you. While you feel that the validity of the four page summary does not really affect our lives, I feel differently because it affects my well being, the wellness of my family and the stability of our country, which is dependent upon the person in the oval office. The decisions of the so called professional investigators was not given to us and we know not what the evidence actually is.

Perhaps you missed it, but they released about 99% of Mueller's full report, nothing in that report refutes anything that Barr wrote in his summary.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

DaveO wrote:

The Clinton card rides again!

I suppose the B******i investigations could be revisited.

I see, so because we have Trump the Clinton name should never be mentioned again, it does not bother you that she deleted 30,000 emails that were under subpoena and then washed the hard drive, or that everyone around her were granted immunity without demands to cooperate in the investigation. Yes, I think that there was a miscarriage of justice there, it is not the punishment of Clinton that I am interested in but rather an investigation in to the possible misdeeds of the FBI and the DOJ in that matter, and guess what, it is happening as we throw darts at each other here.

It does not bother me that you somehow think that it is bulls**t to mention the way that Clinton was handled, it does not show any shortcoming on my part, but rather an extreme bias on yours.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Blurryeyed wrote:

The report was lightly redacted, only Grand Jury t... (show quote)

This rhetoric is old and repetitive. I believe what the report may contain has nothing to do with my belief that it should be released to Congress. Your statements of light redaction or executive privilege is merely your method of your political bias in an attempt to prohibit full disclosure. Many likely believe this as well, but the fact is that we don't know what the facts are.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

DaveO wrote:

This rhetoric is old and repetitive. I believe what the report may contain has nothing to do with my belief that it should be released to Congress. Your statements of light redaction or executive privilege is merely your method of your political bias in an attempt to prohibit full disclosure. Many likely believe this as well, but the fact is that we don't know what the facts are.

Wh**ever Dave... I think that you are just trolling at this point, arguing for the sake of arguing.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

WNYShooter wrote:

Perhaps you missed it, but they released about 99% of Mueller's full report, nothing in that report refutes anything that Barr wrote in his summary.

Perhaps you missed it, but that is not full disclosure. It appears some fear what may be revealed. Your attempt to force your beliefs are futile.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Blurryeyed wrote:

Wh**ever Dave... I think that you are just trolling at this point, arguing for the sake of arguing.

You claim to seek engagement in constructive debate, but that only works for you if you are able to push your political agenda. Your typical dissatisfied response is your trolling accusation. If you want to construe my belief that total disclosure is political, that is really quite convenient. I am not comfortable with your premise that the interpretation of the report was as Mueller intended. If you can't respect that....Wh**ever. LOL!

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

DaveO wrote:

You claim to seek engagement in constructive debate, but that only works for you if you are able to push your political agenda. Your typical dissatisfied response is your trolling accusation. If you want to construe my belief that total disclosure is political, that is really quite convenient. I am not comfortable with your premise that the interpretation of the report was as Mueller intended. If you can't respect that....Wh**ever. LOL!

LOL.... Wh**ever Dave...

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Blurryeyed wrote:

I see, so because we have Trump the Clinton name s... (show quote)

Again with your agenda. The bulls**t part is some feel the need to repeatedly use the same old crap to somehow remediate trumps actions. Does that provide some warm feelings by justifying or excusing his behavior? Does it make you feel more correct by admonishing me with unrelated accusations of supporting Clinton? Yeah, constructive debate. Also known as soapbox showmanship.

Done.
Gee, finish off by pointing out my trump hatred.

wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma

rehess wrote:

Trump says nothing about clean air - and does nothing for it in either country. His issue with them is the cheap items that American v**ers could make.

not much Trump can do about clean air in China, India, etc...they are the great polluters

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

DaveO wrote:

Again with your agenda. The bulls**t part is some feel the need to repeatedly use the same old crap to somehow remediate trumps actions. Does that provide some warm feelings by justifying or excusing his behavior? Does it make you feel more correct by admonishing me with unrelated accusations of supporting Clinton? Yeah, constructive debate. Also known as soapbox showmanship.

Done.
Gee, finish off by pointing out my trump hatred.

I don't think that I said a word about you supporting Clinton, look back through the thread, I did however respond to this comment...

quote=DaveO The Clinton card rides again!

I suppose the B******i investigations could be revisited.