Current Trump Trade Tariffs (Page 12): Honestly, Biden has a lot of issues and he is not very sharp. I don't think the country wants 4 more years of obummer and I believe Biden wants...

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

DaveO wrote:

That's what e******ns are for, lol. Remember, it was felt that the Pubs were in the same predicament with trump and surprize, surprize! I still think that ultimately trump will destroy himself, but that's more likely just wishful thinking.

Honestly, Biden has a lot of issues and he is not very sharp. I don't think the country wants 4 more years of obummer and I believe Biden wants to give the i******s healthcare which will not set will with Americans. The deal with him and his son may be his undoing.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

DaveO wrote:

Give it a rest in lieu of looking like a sicko.

You and Spud should be locked up together.

Who is spud?

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Elaine2025 wrote:

Honestly, Biden has a lot of issues and he is not very sharp. I don't think the country wants 4 more years of obummer and I believe Biden wants to give the i******s healthcare which will not set will with Americans. The deal with him and his son may be his undoing.

Lots of baggage for all parties. My bet is on court dispositions regarding all the manure going on now will have some effect.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Elaine2025 wrote:

Who is spud?

LOL, that's an old moniker for Idaho!

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

DaveO wrote:

Lots of baggage for all parties. My bet is on court dispositions regarding all the manure going on now will have some effect.

Correct, but I think with Hildabeast paying for the f**e dossier, the part the FBI and DOJ played by not vetting anything, is going to make a lot of people walk away when they find out the country went through more than two years of dems lying only to have the t***h come out. And they are still screaming to impeach. It is going to get very ugly. There will be some explaining to do as to why Comey declared hildabeast innocent before he even interviewed her.

I think there will be some dems heading for jail.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Elaine2025 wrote:

Correct, but I think with Hildabeast paying for th... (show quote)

I don't think hilly is a major concern for many. I believe that there are many who would like a more visible accounting of the Mueller report and really are interested in a complete examination. To fight it gives a feeling that there is some sort of incriminating evidence. I'm not looking for legal opinions, arguments or any speculation on its content, but rather why Congress can't be trusted with the contents.

mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area

Elaine2025 wrote:

Correct, but I think with Hildabeast paying for th... (show quote)

I looked for any t***h in what you posted. There is none. But you are never bothered by lack of t***h. You and your mushroom headed hero have that in common. Is it true that you were mostly mad at Stormy because she got him first?

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

mjmoore17 wrote:

I looked for any t***h in what you posted. There is none. But you are never bothered by lack of t***h. You and your mushroom headed hero have that in common. Is it true that you were mostly mad at Stormy because she got him first?

Could have gone all day without that remark...

mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area

[quote=DaveO]Could have gone all day without that remark...[/quote

Happy to help.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

DaveO wrote:

I don't think hilly is a major concern for many. I believe that there are many who would like a more visible accounting of the Mueller report and really are interested in a complete examination. To fight it gives a feeling that there is some sort of incriminating evidence. I'm not looking for legal opinions, arguments or any speculation on its content, but rather why Congress can't be trusted with the contents.

I hear you, but on the other hand the report was for Barr and he was under no legal obligation to release it to congress or anyone else. At any time Trump could have claimed Executive Privilege and had much of the report redacted and he didn't even though some of it was not flattering to him.

Here is my opinion: Mueller stated he did not disagree with Barr's findings (Barr 4 page brief). That should be good enough. Dems do not have Grand Jury testimony or notes. They aren't supposed to have that. Even after that the dems are still screaming impeach. Americans are s**k of hearing about it. Dems will destroy themselves.

mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area

Elaine2025 wrote:

I hear you, but on the other hand the report was f... (show quote)

How dishonest. You try to prove Mueller's intent by using Barr’s report rather than Mueller’s response. The majority of Americans are Dems, has been and will be.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Elaine2025 wrote:

I hear you, but on the other hand the report was f... (show quote)

Who is to decide what is "good enough?" Nobody can be trusted and theoretically Congress should be able to ensure total t***sparency. I mentioned that I am not interested in laymen legal interpretations, hence my thought that the courts could have a heck of an impact on current events.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

DaveO wrote:

Who is to decide what is "good enough?" Nobody can be trusted and theoretically Congress should be able to ensure total t***sparency. I mentioned that I am not interested in laymen legal interpretations, hence my thought that the courts could have a heck of an impact on current events.

I might feel differently if the dems didn't display such rabid stupidity and constant lies - not that the other side is perfect. How many times over the last two years did Adan Schiff say he has seen PROOF that Trump colluded with Russia to win the e******n...... and it was all a big lie.

My opinion.....congress could use a dose of t***h serum:)

mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area

Elaine2025 wrote:

I might feel differently if the dems didn't display such rabid stupidity and constant lies - not that the other side is perfect. How many times over the last two years did Adan Schiff say he has seen PROOF that Trump colluded with Russia to win the e******n...... and it was all a big lie.

My opinion.....congress could use a dose of t***h serum:)

Again, lies by Elaine. Only Repubs seem to think that because Mueller said collusion was not a legal term, no collusion was done. On what page did Mueller say that he investigated and found no collusion. You lied and said you read the report so it should be easy.
Very convenient for you to make accusations and then not back them up. Your lies are so t***sparent.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

DaveO wrote:

I don't think hilly is a major concern for many. I believe that there are many who would like a more visible accounting of the Mueller report and really are interested in a complete examination. To fight it gives a feeling that there is some sort of incriminating evidence. I'm not looking for legal opinions, arguments or any speculation on its content, but rather why Congress can't be trusted with the contents.

I just see it as the dems asking for tons of free campaign research, Trump has been cleared by Mueller, do you really believe that Pencil Neck and Saggy Nads could find things that Mueller couldn't?

It is all political at this point and it is about the 2020 campaign, maybe you should ask yourself if this is not why you support the current efforts in the house.