willaim Loc: Sunny Southern California

Just wondering if any of the UHH'ers, and I'm sure there are, have the 6D MarkII and how do they like it? I have the 80D which is probably a step below the 6D and am thinking about a full frame sensor camera. Not sure about the EOS R,yet, but since I have lenses and equipment for the EOS series, I'll stay with that and not another system. Of cause I'll check out the camera before I decide, but is it worth it? Appreciate any thoughts, Yea or Ney.

Ched49 Loc: Pittsburgh, Pa.

I don't have the 6D but have read reviews about it. 26mp, 6.5 fps, shoots good in low light...what,s not to like, go for it.

Gifted One Loc: S. E. Idaho

I went from the 60D to 6D. I added L premium len(s). I had some very great EFs (crop frame) glass. I watched and bought them at great prices. I have several shooters in family so have not sold.

Many are not aware of the EF/EFs compatibility.

While I have not found a need to move to a newer body I would not hesitate to go to the Mark II. I am watching for the 5/5.

What glass do you have?

J. R.

Gifted One Loc: S. E. Idaho

Dup

LFingar Loc: Claverack, NY

What are your reservations about the EOS R? Actually, the EOS RP is closer to the 6DII then the EOS R. Essentially the same sensor at a very reasonable price, although, the 6DII is currently priced the same as the EOS RP. Until the sale ends, anyway. I love my 5DIV and hated the idea of the market moving towards mirrorless. Until Canon came out with their full frame EOS R that is. I took the plunge a few months ago and bought the EOS R and the RF 24-105 f/4 L. I have barely touched the 5DIV since then. In fact, I've thought about selling it rather then letting it just sit on the shelf and collect dust. I have yet to find anything of consequence that the 5DIV can do that the EOS R can't do as well or often better. I really think you would find the comparison between the 6DII and the EOS RP to be about the same. The auto focus is the big thing for me. It is spot on virtually every time. The 5DIV does a good job in auto focus but the R is near perfect. I recently bought a 2x extender to use with my 100-400 L II. That combo on the 5DIV would leave me with no auto focus. On the R I have full auto focus capability. The new RF lenses for the R and RP seem to be exceptional, based on my experience with the RF 24-105, plus, with the included adapter I can use any EF lens as well as EF-s lenses if I had any. All of my EF lenses work as well or better on the R.
So, you might want to take a closer look at the RP or the R , if you have the budget. I very much doubt that you would be disappointed in either.

crazydaddio Loc: Toronto Ontario Canada

Issues with R is FPS in continuous AF and single card slot (I shoot weddings)....otherwise I would have ditched my 5Dm4 for the R in a heartbeat. Kept the EF L glass with adapter and started buying R mount.

If you dont shoot sports and can live with the risk of the SD failing, R is an excellent value.

LFingar Loc: Claverack, NY

I turned off the continuous auto focus as soon as I got my R, so, if there are any issues that haven't been addressed by the two firmware updates I am not aware of them. I have yet to figure out why anyone would even want continuous auto focus. Eats up the battery and puts more wear and tear on the lens.
As far as the single card slot, despite claims by many, that's really more of an issue for a pro such as yourself then most users of the camera. Wouldn't make a difference to the OP I would think since so far as I know the 6DII only has a single slot.
For the sports I occasionally shoot, basketball as well as F1 and Indycar, I stopped using my 7DII when I got the 5DIV. I liked the results better despite the lower frame rate. I expect I will like the results with the R even better even though it has a slightly slower frame rate then the 5DIV.
Did I misunderstand? You stated you don't have an R or RP but you are buying R mount lenses. You can only mount them on an R or RP. I assume I read that wrong and would appreciate a clarification.

crazydaddio Loc: Toronto Ontario Canada

Sorry, what I meant was I would have bought the R and used my EF lenses and then would have started acquiring RF mount lenses IF it had the FPS issue when AF Continuous focus is on fixed plus had 2 slots.

When I said Continous AF, i meant servo AF. (Ie only would focus when you half-pressed or BBFd). My understanding is that you can get high FPS as long as the camera is not asked to refocus between frames. In that case it can drop down to 3FPS or worse ... not useable to shoot sports. (Ok for car racing as you can pre-focus and then fire off a short burst when the car arrives at the spot on the course.)

If I am wrong about the FPS when servo is on, then I would reconsider buying the R but I would rather save my money and wait for the pro-level version which I am hoping will be out in 2020. If I dont start hearing some rumours soon, I may just jump ship and go to Sony which is way ahead in the eyeAutofocus/FPS/4K world.
For pure stills, Canon rocks with their new RF mount lenses. (Even in weddings, you still need servoAF with lowlight AF for the bride walking down the aisle in candle lighting . My 5DMiv is still trusted in this department :-)

ltj123 Loc: NW Wisconsin

I've have my 6d2 for bit over a year and think it's great. Things I like is ease of use with touch screen, size is more like similar Mirrorless cameras also if that's a factor.
I've stated before this is a better fit for me then prior 7d2 also.

ggab Loc: ?

What do you plan to use it for?
I have a 6D and 6D MKII. I hardly use the 6D any longer. I use the 6D MKII for indoor as well as a second camera for nature and sports.
The only thing I didn't love in the beginning is the touch screen. I just don't like touch screens, however it is growing on me.

The mirrorless cameras are too small for my taste. I just don't like the ergonomics yet.

Jimmy T Loc: Virginia

Great advice!

anotherview Loc: California

I own and use the Canon 6D Mark II. It produces very good images. I have the Sigma 24-105mm lens mounted to it.

See this write-up of this fine camera: https://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/6d-mk-ii.htm

stenojj

I have the 6DM2 as well. I don't use it often, but it's great in low light. I tend to keep my T6s on my tripod with my EF 100-400 L IS II because I love taking pictures of birds in the yard. I took my 6DM2 and 24-105 L with me on vacation, however. Both of my cameras have a touch and rotating screen and I LOVE those features!

DaveJ Loc: NE Missouri

I have had the 6d MK II for a year. For me, it has been a great camera. I bought a second about 5 months ago.( Quick decision due to great sale) After much thought , I decided a crop frame would be a better second camera for me.Got a 80D. More reach with existing lens for mostly bird photography. I have one of my 6d MK II in the classified on UHH, if interested in used. That said, you should check out the mirrorless before making a final decision. You will not be unhappy with a full frame.PS: One great thing about the 6D MK II / 80D combo are all the dials, controls and menu's are almost identical, so whichever camera I pick up feels/works the same. I'm in my 60's, so this is a benefit for me.

MrBob Loc: lookout Mtn. NE Alabama

Depends on what your needs are.... 6D will do better in low light and mark II will do better at higher ISO. Are you a tripod guy or handheld guy ? Landscape or action ? Makes a big diff. I recently bought the 6D because I am a tripod, lower light, landscape kind of guy. What are your needs ?