The Washington Post (Page 2): You really don't know jack. Stop being the typical lib f*****t socialist dem, trying to make something out of nothing. I reported the title of the article...

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

Kmgw9v wrote:

I said it—one should read the actual article before making comment, as well as listening to others commentary. I simply wondered how your research and thought processes generated conclusions. I think I now know.

You really don't know jack. Stop being the typical lib f*****t socialist dem, trying to make something out of nothing. I reported the title of the article and that is how it was presented. Get over yourself, you are just another democrat sore loser that cannot admit he has been lied to for over two years and was dumb enough to believe every damn word. You also cannot admit that FOX was right.

When FOX show the title of the article, they showed a montage of the f**e lying media screaming, impeach, the beginning of the end, blah blah blah. Every damn one were liberal liars shooting off their mouths and never using any common sense and did not care that they were lying. Their job was to try and get rid of a duly elected President.

Now the investigations start on the democrats. I'm looking forward to that. We might need to build another prison to house them all.

Angmo

Kmgw9v wrote:

“The President’s actions did not rise to acts of criminal obstruction of justice.”
That is a twisted interpretation of what Mueller did NOT say.

Watch Barr’s press conference and line up for your crow plate.

chrisscholbe Loc: Kansas City, MO

Elaine2025 wrote:

Last night it was announced on Fox that a WP repor... (show quote)

So....You're all for investigations into Obama but not for Trump.....Hmmmmmm

Sounds like Double Standard, to me.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

chrisscholbe wrote:

So....You're all for investigations into Obama but not for Trump.....Hmmmmmm

Sounds like Double Standard, to me.

You are the typical lib f*****t socialist dem that says crap with no basis in fact. WHERE DID I EVER SAY DON'T INVESTIGATE TRUMP? I was however smart enough to know the investigation was demonic crap brought on by the demonic dems.

Really, what is wrong with you and your thought process???? We just went through two years of investigation on Trump and his campaign while listening to lies, conspiracy theories, f**e lying media and dems in congress saying they had PROOF of Trumps involvement with Russia. Two friggin years of dems trying to unseat a duly elected President, all brought about by the lies bought and paid for by the dems. You damn right I want the lying, c***ting , thieving dems investigated and they can start with Hildabeast destroying her email, what obummer knew, when he knew it and how ass deep was obummers White House in this f**e concern over collusion that the dems actually made up.

chrisscholbe Loc: Kansas City, MO

Elaine2025 wrote:

You are the typical lib f*****t socialist dem that... (show quote)

Wow.....I can see this isn't an emotional topic for you.

First....I was using the "royal" you....pertaining to a wider audience...NOT you personally....sorry I wasn't more obvious about that.

Second...there are "a lot" of people on this site, mostly conservatives, that believe that...even though many indictments came out of the Mueller investigation...since none are directed at Trump, that the investigation was a waste of time. You may not be one of them.

Third....I am ALWAYS for investigating/prosecuting ANYONE who has, or is believed to have, broken the law.
I believe most of my fellow Liberals agree with me.

Fourth...why the name calling?????

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Kmgw9v wrote:

Did you bother to read the WP article?

I did and if you would like to read it here is a link, I particularly liked the last few sentences.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/04/15/admit-it-fox-news-has-been-right-all-along/?utm_term=.2d8f8ae485af

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Kmgw9v wrote:

Obstruction of justice can occur when there is no conviction of a crime which gave rise to the obstruction attempt.

You are fishing in a puddle that has no fish.... It is time for you guys to give up, win at the b****t box and let this go for the good of your country.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

chrisscholbe wrote:

So....You're all for investigations into Obama but not for Trump.....Hmmmmmm

Sounds like Double Standard, to me.

Are you suggesting that we need more investigation into our president?

mwalsh Loc: Houston

Kmgw9v wrote:

Obstruction of justice can occur when there is no conviction of a crime which gave rise to the obstruction attempt.

This is quite true.

From Barr's comments to the press, it sounds like some acts could be construed as obstruction based on theories that Barr, Mueller et al debated. It also sounds like they decided that Trump's efforts did not rise to a prosecutable level.

We are not going to know until we know, but it sounds like this collusion/obstruction idea is being laid to rest. Hopefully the public release of the report will put this to bed.

I have not raised much hell at all about collusion, even though I find Trump quite distasteful. I am just trusting the process.

Mueller did not strike out in my opinion. He did his job, likely quite thoroughly. So far, it sounds like he found nothing to pursue.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

Kmgw9v wrote:

Obstruction of justice can occur when there is no conviction of a crime which gave rise to the obstruction attempt.

But not when there was no crime.

There was no crime.

Read a book.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

chrisscholbe wrote:

Wow.....I can see this isn't an emotional topic fo... (show quote)

It is not emotional for me, I like many others are sick to death of the lying democrat s**t show that has went on for two and a half years all to confirm the dems paid for the lies used to go after Trump, knowing the goal was to unseat a duly elected President by any means they could. Even if one is demonic that should be of a concern.

Most of your fellow liberals ignore the report and still proclaim Trump is guilty. Have you not been listening to the lying f**e media lately?

chrisscholbe Loc: Kansas City, MO

Blurryeyed wrote:

Are you suggesting that we need more investigation into our president?

Not unless new information comes to light.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

EyeSawYou wrote:

Lolol did you not read what she said??? How could there be obstruction when there was NO CRIME COMMITED to obstruct?

There doesn't need to be a crime for there to be obstruction. If the obstruction is effective enough, there will be no effective prosecution for the original crime and may not even be proof that one was committed. That is the primary reason for obstruction to be a crime. There is no insult intended in this post, but someone sure should right you a post with one.

chrisscholbe Loc: Kansas City, MO

Elaine2025 wrote:

It is not emotional for me, I like many others are sick to death of the lying democrat s**t show that has went on for two and a half years all to confirm the dems paid for the lies used to go after Trump, knowing the goal was to unseat a duly elected President by any means they could. Even if one is demonic that should be of a concern.

Most of your fellow liberals ignore the report and still proclaim Trump is guilty. Have you not been listening to the lying f**e media lately?

How would we know if it were not investigated?

If there is sufficient evidence that Dem's broke the law.....investigate it and prosecute if evidence is found to justify prosecution.

Your language implies that you are upset about this.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Kmgw9v wrote:

The crime of obstruction of justice is not always directly related to a criminal CONVICTION.

I mean no disrespect, but one should never try to teach a pig to sing. If these posts have been for your own amusement, I will slink off and mind my own business. To not be misunderstood, I read your posts a lot and consider you to be serious, intelligent, informed, and sincere.