The Washington Post
Apr 18, 2019 07:21:37 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Last night it was announced on Fox that a WP reporter did an article for the post declaring "FOX IS THE ONLY STATION WHO HAD IT RIGHT FOR THE PAST TWO YEARS. Of course it was in reference to the whole Russia crap being a h**x paid for by the democrats to stop Trump from getting elected and then to unseat a duly elected President.
They are now moving towards the messiah because this all started in the White House under obummer. Imagine that. Bring on the investigations and open up the jail cells.
Maybe that is why FOX is the most trusted cable news channel
They are now moving towards the messiah because this all started in the White House under obummer. Imagine that. Bring on the investigations and open up the jail cells.
Maybe that is why FOX is the most trusted cable news channel
Apr 18, 2019 07:28:11 #
Apr 18, 2019 07:42:38 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Kmgw9v wrote:
Did you bother to read the WP article?
As I stated, it was announced on the news and the article was discussed.
Apr 18, 2019 08:04:20 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
As I stated, it was announced on the news and the article was discussed.
Rather than trust others, one should read the article by Gary Abernathy to make serious comment.
Apr 18, 2019 08:08:44 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Kmgw9v wrote:
Rather than trust others, one should read the article by Gary Abernathy to make serious comment.
I did.
Nice bluff.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/opinions/2019/04/15/admit-it-fox-news-has-been-right-all-along/
Apr 18, 2019 08:18:33 #
“The President’s actions did not rise to acts of criminal obstruction of justice.”
That is a twisted interpretation of what Mueller did NOT say.
That is a twisted interpretation of what Mueller did NOT say.
Apr 18, 2019 10:11:01 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Kmgw9v wrote:
Rather than trust others, one should read the article by Gary Abernathy to make serious comment.
I said the title of the article which should describe the article. Are you disputing the title or the content. If you have something to say, say it.
Apr 18, 2019 10:12:30 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Kmgw9v wrote:
“The President’s actions did not rise to acts of criminal obstruction of justice.”
That is a twisted interpretation of what Mueller did NOT say.
That is a twisted interpretation of what Mueller did NOT say.
How about the fact that there was no crime of collusion with Russia, so how can there be obstruction if no crime was committed. Jeezeee, you guys will look for anything no matter how far out in left field it is.
Apr 18, 2019 10:21:31 #
Obstruction of justice can occur when there is no conviction of a crime which gave rise to the obstruction attempt.
Apr 18, 2019 10:23:30 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
How about the fact that there was no crime of collusion with Russia, so how can there be obstruction if no crime was committed. Jeezeee, you guys will look for anything no matter how far out in left field it is.
Because President Trump was trying to obstruct justice so we would not find out the t***h that he didn't collude with Russia. Oh wait! LOLOL
Apr 18, 2019 10:24:34 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
EyeSawYou wrote:
Because President Trump was trying to obstruct justice so we would not find out the t***h that he didn't collude with Russia. Oh wait! LOLOL
Apr 18, 2019 10:25:08 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
Obstruction of justice can occur when there is no conviction of a crime which gave rise to the obstruction attempt.
Lolol did you not read what she said??? How could there be obstruction when there was NO CRIME COMMITED to obstruct?
Apr 18, 2019 10:25:12 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Kmgw9v wrote:
Obstruction of justice can occur when there is no conviction of a crime which gave rise to the obstruction attempt.
Pretty tough to obstruct justice on a "crime" that never happened.
Apr 18, 2019 10:25:48 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
I said the title of the article which should describe the article. Are you disputing the title or the content. If you have something to say, say it.
I said it—one should read the actual article before making comment, as well as listening to others commentary. I simply wondered how your research and thought processes generated conclusions. I think I now know.
Apr 18, 2019 10:30:21 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
Pretty tough to obstruct justice on a "crime" that never happened.
The crime of obstruction of justice is not always directly related to a criminal CONVICTION.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.