Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Trump strongly considers dumping i*****l a***ns in sanctuary cities.
Page <<first <prev 6 of 15 next> last>>
Apr 13, 2019 18:11:51   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
papakatz45 wrote:
Absolutely! Integrating immigrants into society. What's wrong with that?


Sure. We all agree. LEGAL immigrants, that is. Bring them on. Oh wait. We can't because the i*****l i*******ts are flooding the system.

Dennis

Reply
Apr 13, 2019 18:15:00   #
papakatz45 Loc: South Florida-West Palm Beach
 
Angmo wrote:
Excluding criminal trespassers.


No no! Let the criminals settle in the sanctuary cities. Give the lefties more crime to deal with.

Reply
Apr 13, 2019 18:15:23   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
No surprise that you support him. I have no hesitation to call Trump by his real name – t*****r, perhaps our country’s worst t*****r ever. I speak of his attack on our allies, his appeasement of our adversaries, his assault on the press, his coddling of r****ts, his repulsive misogyny, his rampant corruption, his terrible cronyism, his brazen nepotism, his abuse of children, his obstruction of justice, his contempt for our justice system, his war on the environment or his cowardly abasement in Moscow.
No surprise that you support him. I have no hesita... (show quote)


You desperately need help.

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2019 18:18:39   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
dennis2146 wrote:
Honestly what do you expect him to do. I******s were not coming here by the busload in the past. My belief is that people are getting these people primed and instigating them to come here at the same time. Please don't tell me you think that, All of a sudden 5000 people in Guatemala decide at the very same time, Hey, let's walk to America and declare we are in need of help because we are, after 100 years of the same old crap, in need of help to save our lives. These people are not in any more danger now than they were years ago.

Have you heard of any r**ts in Central America, any wars lately down there, anything that would mean death to these people, k**ler hurricanes, tornadoes, anything? I sure haven't. They are in WANT of economical help, not help from danger. America sends their governments Millions to Billions of dollars every year to help these people. Where did that money go? Why on earth should we be sending then anything if we get nothing in return?

Yes, those people are being heavily influenced by people in our own country. Those people are called Liberal Democrats who influence the people of Central America and Mexico to come here with offers of freebies which I have described in numerous posts. Sanctuary cities are illegal yet they flourish because there isn't much that can be done. But in my opinion the people, Liberal Democrats are as anti American as one can get. They are just as Obama was, saying one thing and then doing just the opposite. He tried his best to bring down America and the people who support sanctuary cities are in the same class of people. They want thousands of i*****l a***ns to flood to America where we will have no ability to properly do anything but let them in with a citation to appear in a couple of years. But that s**ts right into the faces of those legal immigrants who have been waiting for years to come here the right way. But Liberals don't see that or just don't care.

Dennis
Honestly what do you expect him to do. I******s w... (show quote)




I think a Methodist church in Chicago with the aid of Soros is behind the caravans.

Reply
Apr 13, 2019 18:20:42   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
letmedance wrote:
I think a Methodist church in Chicago with the aid of Soros is behind the caravans.


Definitely Soros and probably definitely Obama as well in my opinion.

Dennis

Reply
Apr 13, 2019 18:28:34   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
Read a book. President Donald Trump's decision to begin the process of withdrawing the United States from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty will end an arms control agreement with Russia that has been a centerpiece of European security since the Cold War.


I don't think that we would find that in a book, but you are right however if the Russians are c***ting and the Chinese are not a signatory I think that the president is doing the right thing, I am not so sure that is what Dave was talking about but maybe it was.

Reply
Apr 13, 2019 19:32:39   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
No surprise that you support him. I have no hesitation to call Trump by his real name – t*****r, perhaps our country’s worst t*****r ever. I speak of his attack on our allies, his appeasement of our adversaries, his assault on the press, his coddling of r****ts, his repulsive misogyny, his rampant corruption, his terrible cronyism, his brazen nepotism, his abuse of children, his obstruction of justice, his contempt for our justice system, his war on the environment or his cowardly abasement in Moscow.
No surprise that you support him. I have no hesita... (show quote)


As you Liberals tell us so often with regard to Hillary, Prove it. Not one of your claims is true.

You have only a bunch of disgruntled losers all pissed at Trump for Hillary’s loss. Do you claim he is a r****t and a misogynist, so is everyone who disagrees with a Liberal these days. As for criminal, t*****r, everything else, it is nothing more than sour grapes from losers. As for t*****r, you should know but don’t.

Dennis

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2019 20:28:32   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
dennis2146 wrote:
Honestly what do you expect him to do. I******s were not coming here by the busload in the past. My belief is that people are getting these people primed and instigating them to come here at the same time. Please don't tell me you think that, All of a sudden 5000 people in Guatemala decide at the very same time, Hey, let's walk to America and declare we are in need of help because we are, after 100 years of the same old crap, in need of help to save our lives. These people are not in any more danger now than they were years ago.

Have you heard of any r**ts in Central America, any wars lately down there, anything that would mean death to these people, k**ler hurricanes, tornadoes, anything? I sure haven't. They are in WANT of economical help, not help from danger. America sends their governments Millions to Billions of dollars every year to help these people. Where did that money go? Why on earth should we be sending then anything if we get nothing in return?

Yes, those people are being heavily influenced by people in our own country. Those people are called Liberal Democrats who influence the people of Central America and Mexico to come here with offers of freebies which I have described in numerous posts. Sanctuary cities are illegal yet they flourish because there isn't much that can be done. But in my opinion the people, Liberal Democrats are as anti American as one can get. They are just as Obama was, saying one thing and then doing just the opposite. He tried his best to bring down America and the people who support sanctuary cities are in the same class of people. They want thousands of i*****l a***ns to flood to America where we will have no ability to properly do anything but let them in with a citation to appear in a couple of years. But that s**ts right into the faces of those legal immigrants who have been waiting for years to come here the right way. But Liberals don't see that or just don't care.

Dennis
Honestly what do you expect him to do. I******s w... (show quote)


Back to Obama, you just can’t keep him out of your head.

Reply
Apr 13, 2019 21:20:27   #
RAR_man Loc: stow, MA
 
Violates the Constitution?? BS! Where in the Constitution does it say you can't place i******s in SF or other sanctuary city?

Current practice is to release them after 20 days or after their meeting with magistrate wrt asylum. Their release is just into the general population. There is nothing that prohibits the government from shipping them to any location.

Funny how incensed most of the Dems are other this very logical proposal (possibility) by the Trump admin to move them where they are most favored...Sanctuary Cities. Maybe this will finally spur Congress to get off their asses and do something/anything to fix ridiculously broken immigration policies.

Recently back form NZ and Australia. I was surprised how so many were amazed at how broken our immigration policies are. They couldnt understand why a strong border, including a wall, would be controversial. All said what I always say: "without a border, there is no country." Frankly, I thought they would be more liberal in their views. Nope. They are largely in agreement with Trump on wall and immigration. They all thought his approach was totally logical.

Reply
Apr 13, 2019 21:42:41   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
RAR_man wrote:
Violates the Constitution?? BS! Where in the Constitution does it say you can't place i******s in SF or other sanctuary city?

Current practice is to release them after 20 days or after their meeting with magistrate wrt asylum. Their release is just into the general population. There is nothing that prohibits the government from shipping them to any location.

Funny how incensed most of the Dems are other this very logical proposal (possibility) by the Trump admin to move them where they are most favored...Sanctuary Cities. Maybe this will finally spur Congress to get off their asses and do something/anything to fix ridiculously broken immigration policies.

Recently back form NZ and Australia. I was surprised how so many were amazed at how broken our immigration policies are. They couldnt understand why a strong border, including a wall, would be controversial. All said what I always say: "without a border, there is no country." Frankly, I thought they would be more liberal in their views. Nope. They are largely in agreement with Trump on wall and immigration. They all thought his approach was totally logical.
Violates the Constitution?? BS! Where in the Con... (show quote)


What a stupid post. Maybe you did not notice but NZ and Australia do not have borders. They are islands.
What is illegal is having the military take care of immigrants within the US borders. That's because the military is bound by the Posse Comitatus Act, a 19th- century federal law that restricts participation in law enforcement activities. Unless Congress specifically authorizes it, military personnel can't have direct contact with civilians, including immigrants.
Technically it is not against the constitution because the word immigration does not appear in the constitution. It is against the law.

Reply
Apr 13, 2019 22:03:08   #
RAR_man Loc: stow, MA
 
Distance and oceans make for good borders. the Kiwis and Ozies were just expressing their views about borders. BTW, they are both taking in large number of refugees, but not millions the way we are.

As for Posse Comitatus, state national guards take care of civil disorder often. We are under invasion. Look at the numbers coming into the country. how many is too many? Millions is too many. How many i******s have you fed and housed? How many are you willing to house and feed? We are all paying the price in higher taxes. Tax bills will continue to rise...even though we spend millions in foreign aid. Time for these people to fight and take back their country...not burden ours.

The asylum laws were never meant to handle 100's of 1000's. More like 1's and 10's. EVeryone knows it.

Eventually, this will catch up with you and you'll see how taking in millions was a mistake. Are you willing to house, close, feed i******s on your own dime (not through taxes)? Can they set up camp in your yard as they do in border communities?

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2019 22:22:45   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
RAR_man wrote:
Distance and oceans make for good borders. the Kiwis and Ozies were just expressing their views about borders. BTW, they are both taking in large number of refugees, but not millions the way we are.

As for Posse Comitatus, state national guards take care of civil disorder often. We are under invasion. Look at the numbers coming into the country. how many is too many? Millions is too many. How many i******s have you fed and housed? How many are you willing to house and feed? We are all paying the price in higher taxes. Tax bills will continue to rise...even though we spend millions in foreign aid. Time for these people to fight and take back their country...not burden ours.

The asylum laws were never meant to handle 100's of 1000's. More like 1's and 10's. EVeryone knows it.

Eventually, this will catch up with you and you'll see how taking in millions was a mistake. Are you willing to house, close, feed i******s on your own dime (not through taxes)? Can they set up camp in your yard as they do in border communities?
Distance and oceans make for good borders. the Ki... (show quote)


I would kick you our first. Your false choice regarding someone personally housing immigrants is laughable. I am comfortable with using tax money the way it is currently.

I am currently in Yuma. Most street people and yard campers are white from the USA. Rainbow people, dirty kids and fur people. Lots of drug people. Are you willing to put them in your house or camp in your yard?

Reply
Apr 13, 2019 22:25:54   #
papakatz45 Loc: South Florida-West Palm Beach
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
I would kick you our first. Your false choice regarding someone personally housing immigrants is laughable. I am comfortable with using tax money the way it is currently.

I am currently in Yuma. Most street people and yard campers are white from the USA. Rainbow people, dirty kids and fur people. Lots of drug people. Are you willing to put them in your house or camp in your yard?


So you are okay with letting tax dollars support i******s but not willing to do it directly yourself.

Reply
Apr 13, 2019 22:32:36   #
mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
papakatz45 wrote:
So you are okay with letting tax dollars support i******s but not willing to do it directly yourself.


Correct, just like I am willing to let tax dollars build highways but not willing to do it directly myself. I am also willing to spend money on high schools but not willing to do it directly myself. Just common sense, unlike your f**e proposal.

Reply
Apr 13, 2019 22:35:55   #
papakatz45 Loc: South Florida-West Palm Beach
 
mjmoore17 wrote:
Correct, just like I am willing to let tax dollars build highways but not willing to do it directly myself. I am also willing to spend money on high schools but not willing to do it directly myself. Just common sense, unlike your f**e proposal.


So you don't believe in donating to charity to help those less fortunate than ypu, legal or i******s. Got it. What f**e proposal did I make?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.