Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
polarizing filter and adjusting for light
Page 1 of 2 next>
Aug 18, 2012 06:10:14   #
normanhall Loc: Leslie Missouri
 
i went and looked at previous topics but was unable to find what i was looking for.

When using a polarizing filter do you readjust your apature or shutter speed to compensate for the darkness. EXample if my filter causes me to lose 2 stops when it is being used, should i open up to let in more light. I hope this makes sense.

Reply
Aug 18, 2012 06:47:25   #
martinfisherphoto Loc: Lake Placid Florida
 
If your shooting in Aperture, or shutter priority your camera will adjust automatic for any light lose. If your in full manual treat as such and adjust to the light meter. Your camera meters thru the lens so you don't have to over compensate for the filter if that's what you mean.
normanhall wrote:
i went and looked at previous topics but was unable to find what i was looking for.

When using a polarizing filter do you readjust your apature or shutter speed to compensate for the darkness. EXample if my filter causes me to lose 2 stops when it is being used, should i open up to let in more light. I hope this makes sense.

Reply
Aug 18, 2012 06:58:56   #
normanhall Loc: Leslie Missouri
 
fstop22 wrote:
If your shooting in Aperture, or shutter priority your camera will adjust automatic for any light lose. If your in full manual treat as such and adjust to the light meter. Your camera meters thru the lens so you don't have to over compensate for the filter if that's what you mean.
normanhall wrote:
i went and looked at previous topics but was unable to find what i was looking for.

When using a polarizing filter do you readjust your apature or shutter speed to compensate for the darkness. EXample if my filter causes me to lose 2 stops when it is being used, should i open up to let in more light. I hope this makes sense.
If your shooting in Aperture, or shutter priority ... (show quote)


i am not using the in camera meter. i am using a sekonic 358. i find that my exposures are better when using a light meter over camera meter.

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2012 07:42:52   #
high-flyer Loc: Texas
 
You will need to compensate for the light lost from the filter or the picture will be too dark. Many DSLRs will show a histogram and this will show exposure results. Its always a good idea to look at the histogram to see if you are capturing both highlights and shadows

Reply
Aug 19, 2012 06:36:47   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
nomanhall wrote:
i am not using the in camera meter. i am using a sonic 358. i find that my exposures are better when using a light meter over camera meter.

(( Norman, How much difference do you find between these two metering systems... and do you find the same with other cameras?))

That comment along with complaints about focus problems discussed in previous posting brings up a good area of questions: Supposedly the 1/4 wave "disrupter" filter randomizes the axis of the light and makes it "normally random" as opposed to the preceding linear polarizer. The 1/4 wave is what makes the linear polarized unit into a Circular Polarized Filter, CPF. The CPF/Camera combo is one of the most complex systems. Other filters simply add or subtract parts of the light or intensity, but CPF change the nature of the lite, the character of the photons. Cameras are designed for random light ... that is supposedly why the 1/4 wave "disrupter/randomizer" is used.

Your question is still unanswered after all this yap yap...this may be one of those "whittle-the-stick" til you find what works for your camera CPF combo.

--------------------------------------------
From previous post I provided the following references:
It is important that Photographers understand the Camera, and Composition, but also the very nature of Light.

For those who really want to know about Polarization of light you can read these lab experiments, section 4 discusses polerization, section 4.6 and 4.7 discuss circular polarization using 1/4 wave filters such as scotch tape.
http://instructor.physics.lsa.umich.edu/int-labs/Chapter4.pdf
(Many thanks to the University of Michigan, me ol' alma-mater)
Please ignore the complex mathematical equations or you will personally become a section 8.
(to understand that play on sections see ... http://health.vic.gov.au/mentalhealth/archive/pmc/amend_invol.htm)

Reply
Aug 19, 2012 06:48:59   #
ecobin Loc: Paoli, PA
 
normanhall wrote:
i went and looked at previous topics but was unable to find what i was looking for.

When using a polarizing filter do you readjust your apature or shutter speed to compensate for the darkness. EXample if my filter causes me to lose 2 stops when it is being used, should i open up to let in more light. I hope this makes sense.


The simple answer: with the filter on and turned to accomplish the effect you desire, adjust your settings (aperture, iso, & shutter speed) as you normally do without the filter.

Reply
Aug 19, 2012 08:06:05   #
normanhall Loc: Leslie Missouri
 
dpullum wrote:
nomanhall wrote:
i am not using the in camera meter. i am using a sonic 358. i find that my exposures are better when using a light meter over camera meter.

(( Norman, How much difference do you find between these two metering systems... and do you find the same with other cameras?))

That comment along with complaints about focus problems discussed in previous posting brings up a good area of questions: Supposedly the 1/4 wave "disrupter" filter randomizes the axis of the light and makes it "normally random" as opposed to the preceding linear polarizer. The 1/4 wave is what makes the linear polarized unit into a Circular Polarized Filter, CPF. The CPF/Camera combo is one of the most complex systems. Other filters simply add or subtract parts of the light or intensity, but CPF change the nature of the lite, the character of the photons. Cameras are designed for random light ... that is supposedly why the 1/4 wave "disrupter/randomizer" is used.

Your question is still unanswered after all this yap yap...this may be one of those "whittle-the-stick" til you find what works for your camera CPF combo.

--------------------------------------------
From previous post I provided the following references:
It is important that Photographers understand the Camera, and Composition, but also the very nature of Light.

For those who really want to know about Polarization of light you can read these lab experiments, section 4 discusses polerization, section 4.6 and 4.7 discuss circular polarization using 1/4 wave filters such as scotch tape.
http://instructor.physics.lsa.umich.edu/int-labs/Chapter4.pdf
(Many thanks to the University of Michigan, me ol' alma-mater)
Please ignore the complex mathematical equations or you will personally become a section 8.
(to understand that play on sections see ... http://health.vic.gov.au/mentalhealth/archive/pmc/amend_invol.htm)
quote=nomanhall i am not using the in camera met... (show quote)





This is a hard question to answer i have not been writing this info down but i have 3 different metering systems in the camera spot, matrix, center weighted and then my Sekonic. I get a different reading with each metering system. The on board camera is metering reflective light while my light meter reads ambient. I am trying to get my exposures as close as I can so I don’t have so much post production work to do. I was trying to find out if I move my f-stop or my shutter speed to compensate for the poloarizer if I decide to use one. Now what I have decided is I will use my light meter to take a reading and then use the spot meter in the camera to take a reading on the brightest spot in my landscape and then take an average between the two. Get somewhere in the middle so I don’t blow my highlights.

Reply
 
 
Aug 19, 2012 08:24:53   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Yep, Norman, cut and fit, Blown highlights are blown so I tend to under expose and brighten. Lite/exposure/composition combination has always been the key to a great photo.

Just for the fun of it, take a lite meter reading thru the CPF ,,,, hummm

Reply
Aug 19, 2012 08:52:42   #
normanhall Loc: Leslie Missouri
 
dpullum wrote:
Yep, Norman, cut and fit, Blown highlights are blown so I tend to under expose and brighten. Lite/exposure/composition combination has always been the key to a great photo.

Just for the fun of it, take a lite meter reading thru the CPF ,,,, hummm


yeah i have done that and if it looks like about 2 stops different.

Reply
Aug 19, 2012 09:27:34   #
twowindsbear
 
Ever heard of bracketing your exposures? Make your light readings, choose an exposure combination as a starting point, then adjust either - or both - shutter speed & lens opening, in 1/2 stop steps, for at least +/- 3 stops. 1 exposure 'should' be the BEST and up to your standards.

Reply
Aug 19, 2012 11:18:52   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Twowindsbear may I say that Homer Simpson, other readers, and I have one word in our defense for not mentioning bracketing and that word is.... dah.

Norm, sometime I do look for mysteries in dark corners instead of finding the answers in the light or instead of saying who cares here is a practical approach. In this case do some test shots under typical conditions in which you shoot, with bracketing set wide so that you know that proper exposure will fall between x and y, then leave the bracketing set a bit tighter based on the results.

Confession: It is the film mind set to not realize I have 1200 shots on the roll of digital film .... too many years of 12 shots on a roll.

Reply
 
 
Aug 19, 2012 11:23:57   #
normanhall Loc: Leslie Missouri
 
dpullum wrote:
Twowindsbear may I say that Homer Simpson, other readers, and I have one word in our defense for not mentioning bracketing and that word is.... dah.

Norm, sometime I do look for mysteries in dark corners instead of finding the answers in the light or instead of saying who cares here is a practical approach. In this case do some test shots under typical conditions in which you shoot, with bracketing set wide so that you know that proper exposure will fall between x and y, then leave the bracketing set a bit tighter based on the results.

Confession: It is the film mind set to not realize I have 1200 shots on the roll of digital film .... too many years of 12 shots on a roll.
Twowindsbear may I say that Homer Simpson, other ... (show quote)


I am with you on this. I am not wanting to sit there and take a dozen shots to get one. and then do this each time i change location i am trying to come up with a system where i don't need all those shots. i figure by the time i have done that i have missed the image i wanted.

Reply
Aug 19, 2012 11:24:53   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
normanhall wrote:
fstop22 wrote:
If your shooting in Aperture, or shutter priority your camera will adjust automatic for any light lose. If your in full manual treat as such and adjust to the light meter. Your camera meters thru the lens so you don't have to over compensate for the filter if that's what you mean.
normanhall wrote:
i went and looked at previous topics but was unable to find what i was looking for.

When using a polarizing filter do you readjust your apature or shutter speed to compensate for the darkness. EXample if my filter causes me to lose 2 stops when it is being used, should i open up to let in more light. I hope this makes sense.
If your shooting in Aperture, or shutter priority ... (show quote)


i am not using the in camera meter. i am using a sekonic 358. i find that my exposures are better when using a light meter over camera meter.
quote=fstop22 If your shooting in Aperture, or sh... (show quote)


Norm
If using the TTL metering system, the camera will make the adjustment. When using the hand held you will have to make the adjustment.

Reply
Aug 19, 2012 11:37:16   #
normanhall Loc: Leslie Missouri
 
Mac wrote:
normanhall wrote:
fstop22 wrote:
If your shooting in Aperture, or shutter priority your camera will adjust automatic for any light lose. If your in full manual treat as such and adjust to the light meter. Your camera meters thru the lens so you don't have to over compensate for the filter if that's what you mean.
normanhall wrote:
i went and looked at previous topics but was unable to find what i was looking for.

When using a polarizing filter do you readjust your apature or shutter speed to compensate for the darkness. EXample if my filter causes me to lose 2 stops when it is being used, should i open up to let in more light. I hope this makes sense.
If your shooting in Aperture, or shutter priority ... (show quote)


True the camera will make the adjustments but the ttl does not always make the right choice. for instance doing landscapes the metering ttl will blow out the highlights and what i want to do is try to stop this from happening.


i am not using the in camera meter. i am using a sekonic 358. i find that my exposures are better when using a light meter over camera meter.
quote=fstop22 If your shooting in Aperture, or sh... (show quote)


Norm
If using the TTL metering system, the camera will make the adjustment. When using the hand held you will have to make the adjustment.
quote=normanhall quote=fstop22 If your shooting ... (show quote)

Reply
Aug 19, 2012 11:55:32   #
twowindsbear
 
Try this. . . Set up your camera as you normally do, compose the scene to your satisfaction, take your meter reading with your hand-held meter. . . Change the ISO value of your camera so that your automatic exposure system's exposure agrees with your hand-held meter. THEN place the filter over your lens, and your auto exposure will compensate for the filter's light loss. Yes, this will take a few more seconds, but probably fewer seconds than the bracket series.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.