Frank T wrote:
Elaine you're too stupid to judge stupid.
Go rescue another cat. That's all you're good for.
This looks like frank on the way home.
Frank T wrote:
Elaine you're too stupid to judge stupid.
Go rescue another cat. That's all you're good for.
Little Frankie, it is fun to watch you attack, look stupid, and all because you are a loser. Sucks to be you little Frankie. Maybe the asylum can up your meds during this trying time.
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
She can easily judge YOU ... ain't a close call at all. And what's wrong with rescuing cats? I like cats and have rescued several.
Little Frankie h**es every thing......except lying lib f*****t socialist dems, he loves that evil.
Elaine2025 wrote:
Little Frankie h**es every thing......except lying lib f*****t socialist dems, he loves that evil.
Here's a shocker for you, Elaine. I don't even h**e you.
Pitty, yes, but h**e, no, you're just not that important.
Frank T wrote:
Here's a shocker for you, Elaine. I don't even h**e you.
Pitty, yes, but h**e, no, you're just not that important.
Delusional little Frankie, I couldn't care less what you think about me. Maybe if your sanity EVER returns, your life will change and you can get out of the asylum.
There was an interesting article in the WSJ yesterday. Since the question of r********ns is again being raised, it asked if the children of abolitionists would have to pay r********ns. There was a great animosity towards s***ery in this country from the very beginning. The question must be asked, too, what of the great payment made during the Civil War in loss of life that resulted in the freedom of s***es. Will those lives be counted towards the r********n? We have, over the past few decades been making r********ns through social programs, minority hiring practices and Affirmative Action. The best r********n that could be made in the future is investment in education across the country to enable individuals to be ready to support themselves either through the trades or to go on successfully into college. Societal attitudes, too, towards the importance of education must change. Education is the only way up and out.
The first priority in improving education should be to attract the best individuals to teaching.
SteveR wrote:
There was an interesting article in the WSJ yesterday. Since the question of r********ns is again being raised, it asked if the children of abolitionists would have to pay r********ns. There was a great animosity towards s***ery in this country from the very beginning. The question must be asked, too, what of the great payment made during the Civil War in loss of life that resulted in the freedom of s***es. Will those lives be counted towards the r********n? We have, over the past few decades been making r********ns through social programs, minority hiring practices and Affirmative Action. The best r********n that could be made in the future is investment in education across the country to enable individuals to be ready to support themselves either through the trades or to go on successfully into college. Societal attitudes, too, towards the importance of education must change. Education is the only way up and out.
The first priority in improving education should be to attract the best individuals to teaching.
There was an interesting article in the WSJ yester... (
show quote)
Some s***eowners were B****s. Should their descendants have to pay r********ns? In modern times, affirmative actions discriminates against deserving applicants, in favor of less deserving, less qualified applicants. Should the beneficiaries of affirmative action discrimination pay r********ns to the victims?
My own ancestors immigrated via Ellis Island. They never had s***es nor profited from s***ery. They suffered ethnic discrimination and g****r discrimination. How in heck can anyone suggest that I should pay r********ns to anyone!
Well. Since only democrats owned s***es and republicans freed them. Democrats owe r********ns. No one else’s problem to figure out how and whom. Of course they owe the Republicans too.
S***ery in America is a democrat sin.
Angmo wrote:
Well. Since only democrats owned s***es and republicans freed them. Democrats owe r********ns. No one else’s problem to figure out how and whom. Of course they owe the Republicans too.
S***ery in America is a democrat sin.
Do you ever have an intelligent thought?
Frank T wrote:
Do you ever have an intelligent thought?
You just can’t read. You refuse t***h and history. Odd life you live.
Angmo wrote:
You just can’t read. You refuse t***h and history. Odd life you live.
Actually, I can read.
I have never seen a claim that only Democrats owned s***es except on your ignorant posts.
You keep suggesting that I read, but apparently, your ability to read history stops at 1963. Once the Civil Rights Act was passed by LBJ, the old school Dixiecrats migrated to the Republican party, where they still reside, today.
Frank T wrote:
Actually, I can read.
I have never seen a claim that only Democrats owned s***es except on your ignorant posts.
You keep suggesting that I read, but apparently, your ability to read history stops at 1963. Once the Civil Rights Act was passed by LBJ, the old school Dixiecrats migrated to the Republican party, where they still reside, today.
Nope. You are wrong. That’s just the big lie of propaganda only Useful I***ts cling to. Only democrats owned s***es. You cannot name a single republican who did.
Wake up. That crook LBJ was forced by republicans. He was a h**eful r****t.
Dixiecrats remained solid r****t Dems until their dying day. As are you.
In light of facts and t***h, you always lose.
SteveR wrote:
There was an interesting article in the WSJ yesterday. Since the question of r********ns is again being raised, it asked if the children of abolitionists would have to pay r********ns. There was a great animosity towards s***ery in this country from the very beginning. The question must be asked, too, what of the great payment made during the Civil War in loss of life that resulted in the freedom of s***es. Will those lives be counted towards the r********n? We have, over the past few decades been making r********ns through social programs, minority hiring practices and Affirmative Action. The best r********n that could be made in the future is investment in education across the country to enable individuals to be ready to support themselves either through the trades or to go on successfully into college. Societal attitudes, too, towards the importance of education must change. Education is the only way up and out.
The first priority in improving education should be to attract the best individuals to teaching.
There was an interesting article in the WSJ yester... (
show quote)
I think that the first part of your statement misses the current interpretation of current discussion on r********ns, in my opinion, the discussion goes more to the second part of your post, investment in the blighted communities, the hardliners on r********ns want such investment to go only to b****s and they probably want such investments to come in forms of grants to start small businesses etc. That is probably not going to happen, but what can happen is incentivized investment into underserved neighborhoods. It won't be easy but it has already started. Trump has done much work along these lines and he has more work to do but the press does not cover it.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.