dsmeltz wrote:
Neither of these cameras offer manual control. So I do not see where they can be recommended as a beginner camera. They both lead to quick a dead end in learning photography. The Op already indicated the availability of a used bridge camera indicating it was inside the price range.
Good point. However, a camera without manual mode but with AP and SP modes
and exposure compensation might be suitable (provided it's also possible to turn off
auto-ISO).
I really think confronting a total beginner with manual exposure mode is "sink or swim"--
and my impression is that most sink--especially if the camera is very complicated in other
respects.
I recommend learning one thing at a time, starting with the most fundamental things that
cannot be automated, and moving to the things that can: choice of subject, choice of perspective
and sun angle, composition, aperture, shutter speed, how meters work and exposure compensation,
and finally manual exposure. Automated exposure modes provides a crutch during the early stages
and build confidence.
In other words, I think it's smart to star the student in "Dummy Mode" (Program Mode) in order to
build confidence., then move to AP mode, SP mode and finally manual mode. However, I know this
is not the tradition approach to teaching photography.
The problem isn't auto-exposure, per se, it's the extreme complexity of contemporary digital
cameras and lack of information on how the "advanced" modes actually work.
Does anyone here know (off the top of their head) how matrix metering mode on their
camera actually works: what points are metered and what the weighting formla is? In
averaging or center-weighted mode it's pretty simple, so it's possible to predict when the
meter is likely to need manual compensation.
The goal for the student isn't to learn "camera operation", but to think analytically about exposure,
focus, etc. --in fact, to engage in a sort of internal dialogue. The questions one asks about a scene
are crucially important to getting the right answer (which is rather like R. G. Collingwood's theory
of history).
The first thing the student learns using, say, AP, mode is that it's not perfect. Good lesson! No
automation is perfect: that's why trains have engineers and airliners have pilots.
The second part of the lesson is that because one understand how AP mode works (at least with
Averaging or Center-Weighted metering modes), it's possible to know when a scene is likely to
cause it to fail, and even to correct it with exposure compensation. Another great lesson: what
you understand, you can often control. But what you don't understand controls you.