The "Angry Photographer"
Feb 26, 2019 20:17:01 #
We have a couple of angry people posting here. They also provide a little information and a lot of entertainment.
"The Angry Photographer" can provide 5 minutes worth of information in as little as an hour if he cuts down on the number of times he repeats himself.
--
"The Angry Photographer" can provide 5 minutes worth of information in as little as an hour if he cuts down on the number of times he repeats himself.
--
Feb 26, 2019 20:36:58 #
Black Elk Peak wrote:
A foul mouthed fool, oaf, nincompoop, clown, dunce, dolt, dullard, ignoramus, simpleton; informalidiot, cretin, imbecile, nitwit, halfwit, ninny, dope, dimwit, dumbo, dummy, ass, jerk, nerd, dum-dum, loon, chump, goon, jackass, fathead, blockhead, numbskull, dunderhead, meathead, dipstick, bonehead, chucklehead, clod, goop, knucklehead, lamebrain, peabrain, pudding-head, thickhead, wooden-head, pinhead, airhead, birdbrain, dumbbell, donkey, stupe, noodle
Put away that thesaurus!
This is why I refuse to engage in the abominable crime of bloggery.
Feb 26, 2019 20:51:52 #
Feb 26, 2019 23:44:11 #
DavidPine
Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
graybeard wrote:
You Tube's "Angry Photographer" says that Sigma lenses are all pure junk. End of story. Just junk. He also rarely even mention's Canon, and he often goes off topic into long rants. Any comments ??
He's a Nikon shooter. He also usually knows what he's talking about. I've sent money to him to help him keep going. Rude but smart.
Feb 27, 2019 00:14:53 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
The Angry Photographer is not stupid, far from it;... (show quote)
Search for Mark Smith on YouTube. After watching one of Mark’s videos, who and why would anyone watch a loudmouth like him? Personally, I could care less about any of the youtubers who click bait. None of them are good photographers anyway.
Feb 27, 2019 00:28:04 #
speters wrote:
That used to be the case, but ever since they introduced their line of Global Vision lenses, things have changed and they are now putting out a lot of decent glass!
Is that what he says?
Feb 27, 2019 05:32:58 #
Black Elk Peak wrote:
A foul mouthed fool, oaf, nincompoop, clown, dunce... (show quote)
I take it that you are not too impressed then !
Feb 27, 2019 05:48:28 #
Feb 27, 2019 05:51:53 #
I met a guy like that once. His philosophy was,” I can’t wait to hear what I’m going to say next!”
Feb 27, 2019 05:56:09 #
Feb 27, 2019 06:05:05 #
Feb 27, 2019 06:11:25 #
As a teacher he repeats his point over and over to get you to remember what he said.
Feb 27, 2019 06:29:43 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
graybeard wrote:
You Tube's "Angry Photographer" says that Sigma lenses are all pure junk. End of story. Just junk. He also rarely even mention's Canon, and he often goes off topic into long rants. Any comments ??
Everyone has the right to his/her opinion, right or wrong. It was has kept this country unique.
Feb 27, 2019 06:39:39 #
I agree with some of his information. I also prefer Nikon optics on my Nikon cameras. I also prefer Schneider and Zeiss lenses for other cameras. This includes the Russian made "Leica" lenses.
--Bob
--Bob
graybeard wrote:
You Tube's "Angry Photographer" says that Sigma lenses are all pure junk. End of story. Just junk. He also rarely even mention's Canon, and he often goes off topic into long rants. Any comments ??
Feb 27, 2019 06:43:57 #
I’ve watched most of his posts. He is entertaining. He is spot on with his recommendations. I’ve purchased several lenses based on his reviews and I’ve not been disappointed. The Nikon 200-500 comes to mind and that one is stellar. He was one of the first to tout the Fuji 16 mm lens. No regrets in buying that one... it is a phenomenal lens! All in all he is my go to guy on recos.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.