Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
What do you think could have made this photo better?
Sep 6, 2023 10:38:47 #
No where in my comment did I write "lousy photograph" Your comment, intentional or unintentional implies the rendition is lousy.
Sep 6, 2023 11:07:37 #
2nefoto wrote:
No where in my comment did I write "lousy photograph" Your comment, intentional or unintentional implies the rendition is lousy.
Saying there was "no effort" meant to me it was lousy. At any rate, saying it was a "picture" rather than a "photograph" misunderstands the meaning of "picture". Many pictures in any medium have a lot of effort involved.
Sep 7, 2023 19:08:22 #
To conclude this interaction, with a masters degree in communication, I know how to say "lousy" when and if I mean "lousy". As to the depicted photo requesting information for improvement, as "pictred" it showed nothing other than being something given no photographic efforts. It's simply a rendition of what was there.
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 7, 2023 19:37:39 #
2nefoto wrote:
To conclude this interaction, with a masters degree in communication, I know how to say "lousy" when and if I mean "lousy". As to the depicted photo requesting information for improvement, as "pictred" it showed nothing other than being something given no photographic efforts. It's simply a rendition of what was there.
A masters degree in communication and you don't know what the word "picture" means? Or that "pictred" is not a word at all?
Sep 7, 2023 21:12:19 #
Sep 7, 2023 21:24:48 #
2nefoto wrote:
Ever heard of typographical error
You still refuse to address my main point. You said it was a picture rather than a photograph. Again, that is a false dichotomy. It is a photograph and a picture. All photographs are pictures. Painting, drawings, etc. are also pictures. You can't say a photograph isn't a photograph based on the amount of effort it took.
Sep 7, 2023 23:51:03 #
I like it as it is because of the mood it sets. I doubt many on here could duplicate it.
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Oct 15, 2023 21:12:03 #
Natcw80 wrote:
Hi,
I would remove the sparkles, remove all the background clutter, more light, possibly a different white balance. Put the phone on a stand/ tripod and use the timer to take the photo. How'd I do? 😛😉
Oct 16, 2023 15:16:30 #
Natcw80 wrote:
What could make this photo better?
The thing I don’t like are the dots. Of course there a lot of things you could do but apparently this was the look you were going for. And not a bad look at that.
Chuck
Oct 16, 2023 16:06:28 #
I think the intention was a fun, candid shot of a beautiful young woman; that was successful. I wouldn’t repose it but it would have benefited from sharper focus.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.