Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Raw and/or JPEG
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
Feb 12, 2019 07:31:55   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
marty wild wrote:
If you don’t post process your images what’s the point in shooting Raw....
.....

If you decide to process RAW in the future, you have the RAW files from the older images...

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 16:44:31   #
marty wild Loc: England
 
👍🏻
Fredrick wrote:
You know, I personally just go back and forth about this. I first just shot in jpeg, then became a RAW convert ... but now that I switched to the Fuji system, I find it amazing what I can do with the jpeg images SOOC in post processing.

Now I only shoot in RAW if it’s a set of images I’m doing for a special purpose. It’s just so much simpler.

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 17:35:01   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
Fredrick wrote:
You know, I personally just go back and forth about this. I first just shot in jpeg, then became a RAW convert ... but now that I switched to the Fuji system, I find it amazing what I can do with the jpeg images SOOC in post processing.

Now I only shoot in RAW if it’s a set of images I’m doing for a special purpose. It’s just so much simpler.


For me, it's simpler to shoot raw and postprocess. At my advanced age, I depend on the Lightroom DAM to keep track of images. If I shoot in jpg, I might be tempted to use the jpg directly if it's good. Since I shoot in raw only everything goes into LR as a matter of course. That puts it in the catalog. I'm still able to use the jpg preview if I want to but it's easier to do minimal processing to get the jpg and have the processing steps recorded in LR.

When I say it's simpler, that's the long view. It takes a bit more work to process an image but I more than save that work time when I search in LR for an image.

The only times I don't shoot in raw are (1) when using my camera in live view silent high frame rate because my camera will not produce a raw file in that mode; and (2) when I'm shooting a white frame to look for dust on my sensor. I don't use (1) very often, but it happens.

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2019 18:13:52   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
marty wild wrote:
👍🏻

Your iPhone? symbol looks like a faint smudge on my screen.

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 18:18:52   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
👍 here’s one from my iPhone just to see what it looks like.

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 19:29:03   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
👍 here’s one from my iPhone just to see what it looks like.

Same thing. UHH symbols are brighter and clearer.

Reply
Feb 13, 2019 18:55:27   #
DJphoto Loc: SF Bay Area
 
PhotoNat wrote:
This is my first DSLR camera. When shooting, is it necessary to set it for BOTH raw and JPEG, or can I just set it for raw, then convert to JPEG after post processing in Photo Shop Elements 14? I'm thinking of the amount of space used on my SD card and in my computer storage, with raw vs. both.

I am new to this, so all advice would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
PhotoNat


I moved from a Canon SX 40 HS a little over two years ago to my first DSLR, a Canon 80D. I initially shot only JPEG because I was very happy with the improved images from my 80D and I didn't think I had the time to learn and then do post-processing. I shoot a LOT of photos, especially when I'm at the road races (2 or 3 times a year typically); I shot ~11,000 JPEGs in two days last August at the Rolex Historics at Laguna Seca. It's amazing how many images you can take at 7FPS trying to capture the action. However, I started shooting RAW+JPEG last March, largely in preparation for our first cruise in July. I switched back to JPEG only for the August races due to volume and the fact that I doubted I would have the time to post-process many of the images. I only started learning and doing post-processing (using Lightroom) about 3 months ago. I spent a half day at the Indycar test at Laguna Seca last Friday and shot RAW+JPEG to see how it went (it would have been a whole day, but it started raining and they stopped running). I took about 3,200 photos and deleted almost half on my first cull. I used the JPEGs to decide what to delete and what were worthy of my time to post-process. I am still keeping the ~1,700, but culled those down to 198 that I'm about 25% through post-processing. At some point, I may go through and select a few more for post-processing.

I'm seriously considering only shooting RAW from now on, as the post-processed files (as JPEGs) are the only ones I share now. There are a couple of issues when I'm shooting high volume: SD card space (I currently have 8 32GB fast cards, which won't be enough for a 3 day weekend at the track, and the camera buffer. My 80D buffer fills up at about 20 RAW or RAW+JPEGs vs about 100 JPEGs, so you have to be a bit more selective when "spraying and praying" from both perspectives of SD card space and the buffer. For most other photo shoots, it's not an issue. Also, I back up all of my photos to Dropbox and the highest capacity they offer for a personal (non-business) account is 2 TB and I'm already at about 1.2 TB. Hard drive space is inexpensive enough that it's not an issue (I currently have a 6 TB internal drive and an 8 TB external backup, plus a few 2 TB externals). To get a Dropbox business account with unlimited storage is about $600/year (with 3 users) vs the $200/year I currently pay for a 2 TB personal account. I'm hoping that the 2 TB limit will go up by the time I need more space.

My advice is to shoot RAW+JPEG until you decide which way works best for you. You can never create RAW files from JPEGs, but you can delete RAW files if you decide you don't need them.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.