Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why no collar included
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Feb 1, 2019 17:55:39   #
BBurns Loc: South Bay, California
 
This has always been a sore spot for me. Some with and some without the hinge. Makes it hard to change out in the field.
Yes, the Canon rings are rediculously expensive but BEWARE of the crap from China on eBay. You are trusting it to hold $3-6K of gear
Fotodiox makes a couple of aftermarket ones that are solid.

Enclosed is a chart I compiled a few years ago. There may be more recent info available now.

Attached file:
(Download)

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 18:15:41   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
jaymatt wrote:
And . . . ?

Ditto!

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 13:24:04   #
rydabyk Loc: Florida Panhandle
 
jerryc41 wrote:
So the purpose of the collar is to add weight to balance the lens. That makes perfect sense - like adding tons of rocks to the hold of those old wooden ships.


I like the collar because it also allows you to change the orientation of the camera without changing the composition. Since I don't have an "L" bracket on my secondary camera it comes in quite handy when I'm using both camera's.

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2019 14:13:39   #
Bipod
 
junglejim1949 wrote:
I asked Canon why there was not a tripod collar included with their 70-200 f4, IS, II.

There answer was:
"We do have several versions of the EF 70-200mm lens as you may have noticed. The version you mentioned does not come with the Tripod Collar, while the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM does come with it."

This is because the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM is wider and weighs more than the EF 70-200mm f/4L. Its dimensions are 3.50 x 7.83" and it weighs 3.28 lb. In contrast, the EF 70-200mm f/4L comes in at 2.99 x 6.77" and weighs 1.55 lb.

"Our engineers concluded that a lens collar could offset the size and weight of the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM but that it was not necessary for the EF 70-200mm f/4L."
I asked Canon why there was not a tripod collar in... (show quote)


Consumer preferences in action:
Pros think a tripod collar is essential for a long, heavy lens. There will be times when you need it.
Consumers think "tripods are Old Technology".

Joe Conumer likes convenience and light weight above all else, so that's what you are going to get,
even if you're willing to pay for something better. Just be thankful Canon still puts tripod mounts
on their cameras--and still makes EF lenses (for how much longer?).

The only way to stop this is for all serious photographers to refuse to buy consumer junk. Because
that's what a heavy telephoto lens without a tripod collar is. But if you buy something intending to
modify it to make it usable--spending time and money fixing a brand new lens--that suits the
manufacturer just fine: you bought the product.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.