BandeauRouge wrote:
The whole photographic market segment seems to run on the followin gconcept "you scrub my back, ill scrub yours". "you dont report me for the naked woman chained up in my back yard last night, and i wont report you for selling meth".
When projected image is the only thing that matters, no one has any concern about others image, as long as others claim their own projected image is real. Hard to digest? it comes down to "i know we are dumb, but if you say im actually moon gender, ill claim that you became a woman because you wore a dress this morning".
Just look at the actual websites for these frauds.. look at magnum? the big photo wharehouse magazine place thing.. in the last 8 years, no new white heterosexual men have joined..
Look at the art galleries, look at ilford website since the BLM crap started, god there are people becoming stars in the photography world simply by taking ten shots of drug addicts in philly, but only if black, or female.
Look at the advertising for main photographic retailer websites.. like MPB have the whole advertising scheme, in their own commercials, etc.. that any time a non white woman buys a used camera from them, they INSTANTLY become the greatest profressional photographer.
Actually saying that great revelation gets you kicked off of most mainstream forums
The whole photographic market segment seems to run... (
show quote)
Your remarks have little to do with the craft, art, or business of wedding photography. Sadly they have connotations of xenophobia, misogyny, and homophobia as well as ridiculous stereotyping. This has no place in the section and hopefully, anywhere else on this forum.