Sony a7iii adapter for Canon
Feb 6, 2019 02:01:26 #
DHas wrote:
I bought a Canon 80D 3 years ago and Sony7Riii las... (show quote)
The MC-11 adapter is by far the best solution for Canon glass with Sony cameras. the fotodiox really can't compare, sorry.
Feb 6, 2019 07:20:33 #
Plenty of videos on the internet about adapting canon lenses on Sony. Just remember not all adaptors are created equal. Personally I’d start with Metabones.
Feb 6, 2019 17:44:25 #
Cdouthitt wrote:
Plenty of videos on the internet about adapting canon lenses on Sony. Just remember not all adaptors are created equal. Personally I’d start with Metabones.
As a pro I have extensively used both Metabones and Sigma MC-11 with Canon glass on my Sony bodies. I and most reviewers agree the MC-11 works much better than the Metabones adapter and costs less also. Cheers
Feb 6, 2019 21:48:53 #
gwilliams6 wrote:
As a pro I have extensively used both Metabones and Sigma MC-11 with Canon glass on my Sony bodies. I and most reviewers agree the MC-11 works much better than the Metabones adapter and costs less also. Cheers
Feb 7, 2019 04:37:12 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Have you used a ZEISS Planar T* 50mm f/1.4 ZE Lens
in a Canon mount on your current body?
Or your current lenses with an 50MP EOS 5DS? Or with
a low-pass filter cancelled EOS 5DSr?
Metabones Canon EF to Sony E-Mount Adapter will set
you back another $400 on top of a Sony body that is
not a game-changer vs Canon's two 50MP bodies nor
the 30MP 5DIV.
Have you used a ZEISS Planar T* 50mm f/1.4 ZE Lens
in a Canon mount on your current body?
Or your current lenses with an 50MP EOS 5DS? Or with
a low-pass filter cancelled EOS 5DSr?
Metabones Canon EF to Sony E-Mount Adapter will set
you back another $400 on top of a Sony body that is
not a game-changer vs Canon's two 50MP bodies nor
the 30MP 5DIV.
The OP indicates using a Sony a7-III, a rather pedestrian
camera. You then bring up some expensive 50MP Canon
stuff. Perhaps your eyes added an "R" to the Sony model
name ? IOW the camera bodies you mentioned would be
more like the a7R-III. Why not consider Canon's own "R"
body ? It would be of similar spec's to Sony's basic a7-III
and the adapter for EOS SLR lenses would be only $100.
Apples to apples, an all-Canon version of that borrowed
a7-III would save some sheckels and avoid a third party
adapter. The Sony does offer IBIS, but the OP doesn't
mention whether the L-lenses on hand have OIS ... or
whether IS a factor at all. Would be helpful to know.
.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.