Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Birding
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
Jan 14, 2019 11:31:08   #
mborn Loc: Massachusetts
 
Heavy long lens monopod, lighter lens hand holding

Reply
Jan 14, 2019 11:32:04   #
Nalu Loc: Southern Arizona
 
I try to hand hold everything up to 560mm (FF camera) depending on the light. I try not to shoot below 1/1000 if at all possible. Greater than 560mm I tend to seek support via a tripod and gimbal. Just a comment about monopods, remember, you can never let go of it unless you lay it down. Not so with a tripod.

Reply
Jan 14, 2019 11:34:00   #
DJD Loc: Seal Beach, CA
 
I use a 80-400 and 90% of shots are hand held. I use a tripod with a wireless remote trigger in my backyard when setting up on a known landing spot for various birds.

Reply
 
 
Jan 14, 2019 11:57:58   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
Woodworm65 wrote:
Those of you that are bird photographers I need to ask a question, do you use a monopod when capturing bird photos your thoughts are greatly appreciated.


Big lens and a tripod with a gimbal. Unless I am walking around, then a 100-400 handheld.

Reply
Jan 14, 2019 12:11:42   #
sergiohm
 
It depends on the lens, if it’s too heavy I use a tripod but otherwise hand held.
99% of my shots is hand held, it has to be a very special lens to make me carry a tripod around.
Rarely use a monopod since I can rely on IS 99% of the time.

Olympus M1 Mark II, Canon 400m F5.6, hand held
Olympus M1 Mark II, Canon 400m F5.6, hand held...

Fujifilm. XT-2, Meyer-Optik Görlitz 4/300, tripod
Fujifilm. XT-2, Meyer-Optik Görlitz 4/300, tripod...

Reply
Jan 14, 2019 12:23:36   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Woodworm65 wrote:
Those of you that are bird photographers I need to ask a question, do you use a monopod when capturing bird photos your thoughts are greatly appreciated.


Some people do and some don't. I use a tripod, but my friends Bette and Linda use monopods. They don't like the weight of tripods, and I don't like the way monopods work. I would rather go hand held than monopod.

Reply
Jan 14, 2019 13:06:59   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
Gene51 wrote:
These are some examples of birds shot hand held with a 150-600mm (or equivalent field of view). The 600mm shots are with either a D800 or D810. The equivalent field of view is with a Sony RX10M4.


Sorry to high jack this thread but my God that red wing black bird pic is something else WOW

Reply
 
 
Jan 14, 2019 14:05:16   #
williejoha
 
Tripod or handheld.
WJH

Reply
Jan 14, 2019 14:24:58   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
Yes... sometimes.

I shoot hand held, on a monopod, on a tripod with gimbal, or with the camera and lens on a bean bag resting on a windowsill or whatever.

It depends upon the lens I'm using, how mobile I need to be, how far I'll be walking... It also depends upon the subject and how I'll be shooting them.

For example, when hiking and not wanting to haul 9 lb. of tripod and gimbal head, I'll often take a monopod. It doubles well as a "walking stick", too, when the camera isn't mounted on it. I use a monopod mostly with lenses that have tripod mounting rings (70-200, 300mm, 100-400mm, 500mm... also macro 100mm and 180mm).

For birds in flight, I mostly shoot hand held (2 to 3 lb. 70-200, 3 lb. 300mm f/4, 3.5 lb. 100-400mm).

When shooting from a blind and spending a lot of time sitting and waiting, I usually put the gear on a tripod (especially with 6 lb. 300mm f/2.8, 8 lb. 500mm f/4, possibly with 1.4X or 2X teleconverter... but also sometimes with 100-400, 300mm f/4 and 70-200).

Shooting from a car or while lying prone on the ground, I often use a bean bag (any lens/camera combo). In fact, I leave a beanbag in my car, along with one of my monopods.

Hand held (with 300mm f/2.8, 300mm f/4 & 100-400):




Bean bag/car window (300mm f/2.8):



Monopod (300mm & 500mm):



Tripod w/gimbal (500mm and 500mm w/1.4X):


Reply
Jan 14, 2019 14:25:57   #
JoAnneK01 Loc: Lahaina, Hawaii
 
Handheld. I use my Nikon D810 with a Tamron 150-600 for most of my birdshot. A tripod is too heavy when walking around looking for birds.

Reply
Jan 14, 2019 16:22:35   #
d2b2 Loc: Catonsville, Maryland, USA
 
Tripod, most of the time.

Reply
 
 
Jan 14, 2019 16:23:48   #
PierreD
 
I always shoot handheld. Then again, I use an Olympus EMD-1 Mii camera with 300 mm PRO lens. This comes with dual image stabilization (lens AND camera body), making it possible to get sharp pictures at much (6 stop equivalent) lower shutter speeds than without IS.

Reply
Jan 14, 2019 16:40:57   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
GrandmaG wrote:
That's impressive that you can get such great shots hand-held! Especially with that lens!


Thanks!

I think the weight of the lens is a stabilizing element. I can't really get reliable results using the Sony RX10M4 when zoomed out to 600mm field of view. It only weighs 2.5 lbs. The Sigma and D810 weigh almost 8.5 lbs or slightly less than a Vietnam era M16 rifle with a 30 round magazine. I hold my camera/lens like a rifle, with my left shoulder pointed at the subject, left elbow tucked against my ribs for additional stability, and the rest of my body following my shoulder. I breathe normally, and when I am shooting a stationary bird, I will squeeze the shutter at the end of an exhale. That works for me pretty well.

Reply
Jan 14, 2019 16:49:16   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Zooman 1 wrote:
Good selection of bird photos. Glad you can get such good results hand held.


Thanks!

I shot for 6 yrs with a 600mm F4 on a tripod - with a D300S, D700 and a D800 - other than in really crappy light - I have to say the Sigma Sport doesn't give anything away to the 600mm, and I have the added flexibility of using it hand held, with nothing more than a Black Rapid strap to carry it. My new birding setup doesn't need the 7.5 lb Lens Trekker camera bag, a 6 lb carbon fiber tripod and head - and the lens which weighed 10.5 lbs - I really don't mind a little loss of flexibility with exposure - it's a fair trade off for not having to lug around 26 lbs of gear to get mostly the same results I get with the 8.5 lb alternative - and I get more birds in flght as an added bonus.

Reply
Jan 14, 2019 17:04:29   #
hassighedgehog Loc: Corona, CA
 
Have not done much bird photography. However, trying to use an interesting setup. Have the monopod down to as small as it can go and insert the bottom into a sportfishing belt with a pouch in the center front. Sort of halfway between handheld and tripod held.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.